A Lot of Talk

This site suggests Daley is the number one gun control advocate in the country. Daley is all talk, though. I would put Bloomberg at the top of that list. As someone on the other side of the issue, I consider Bloomberg to be a lot more dangerous to our rights.

Daley is a buffoon for the most part, and has largely staked out an untenable position for much of Chicago’s gun ordinances. Bloomberg is a much stronger strategic thinker, and is better about both offense (MAIG) and defense. New York’s gun laws will be challenged, but Bloomberg will be far better about taking them back to a level where they are more defensible. That’s one reason, strategically, I think it’s wise to take on Chicago first.

Bloomberg Gaining Quite a Collection

Here’s yet another illegal mayor. It’s getting to the point I have to check to make sure I’m not getting this latest one confused with someone I’ve already reported on. There are that many. This one is mayor of Tamarac, Florida. Charges are bribery corruption.

One thing is pretty clear. At this point, MAIG has a considerably higher rate of criminality than people who hold concealed carry permits. Think VPC will set up a site about that?

Do the Math

The gun control supporters are unbelievable with some of the arguments they make. I’m not talking about the blatantly dishonest arguments, like about magazines holding ten rounds being dandy, while ones holding eleven rounds are baby killers. I’m talking about when they fail to do some basic math on their own assertions:

Regulation efforts have failed as courts hold the 2nd amendment to permit virtually anyone a gun, allowing 25% of the population to threaten the remaining 75%. Unequivocally, people have the right to self-defense, however, just 1.5% of the population has used guns for this purpose while over 23,000 die and 52,000 were maimed in 2010.

Even assuming those statistics are correct, which they are not, the United States, as of the 2010 census, has 308 million people. If 1.5% of them have used a firearm for self-defense, that represents 4.62 million people. Assuming an average life expectancy in the US of 78 years, that would average out to about 59,230 self-defense cases with a gun every year, and that’s without weighing the fact that children are typically not permitted to own or carry guns under most circumstances. That sounds like a great case for private gun ownership, then, if you ask me. This is more evidence the gun banning crowd doesn’t think much about what they are saying.

If He Had Said Campaign, I Might Have Believed It

Miguel goes for the traditional April Fool’s joke in the gun blogosphere. One of these days it may not be a joke. The Center is in much better financial shape than the Campaign, however. But I don’t expect the Campaign to declare bankruptcy. Brady will just minimize the amount of activity they conduct under 501(c)(4) auspices. Most of what they do is legal for a 501(3)(c) to engage in, regardless. The Center, if I recall, is still losing money, it just has much further to fall. In addition, their 501(c)(3) status can help them get donations, since they are tax deductible.

Suspected Astroturfing

John Richardson has uncovered some strong evidence that an Letter to the Editor touted by CSGV is an astroturfing effort. To add more evidence to show that it probably is, I looked up to see whether there was any Charles Ford who held an FFL in Oregon by looking up the list from ATF. There is no one named Ford who holds an FFL in the entire state of Oregon. I think it’s safe to conclude that this is indeed an astroturfing effort by our opponents. As I mentioned, they are not above this kind of dishonesty. It’s the only way they can win.

Like Vultures

Our opponents gather around tragedy like vultures will gather around a corpse. Here’s one report of Brady’s Efforts:

“[Giffords is] the most prominent victim since Reagan,” noted Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

The Tucson incident, combined with the Reagan anniversary, gives gun-control advocates a fresh platform.

Don’t sound so enthusiastic about it Paul. But it’s not just the Brady folks. MAIG is not above exploiting tragedy as well, having gathered as many family of victims as they possibly could, which apparently is one. But it makes you wonder how many of the individuals who are supporting the Fix Gun Checks Act know about all the hidden easter eggs in the bill.

I think the gun control groups are stunned they haven’t been able to get any real traction from this tragedy. I’m not convinced they won’t. If Gabby Giffords becomes a crusader for gun control after she recovers, that might be all it takes. But we’ll see.

Disclosure

The media loves disclosure of potentially conflicting interests, except when it comes to their own business. Something about the reporter’s notebook story Sebastian linked to kept rubbing me the wrong way. Then I realized that while the reporter disclosed the source of his funding & research in the notebook, the stories that came out of the Joyce Foundation fellowship made zero mention of the fact that they were bought & paid for by an organization that views gun ownership as a public health problem.

Looking at the work by Brandt Williams, there’s no mention on the website or in the audio files of what aired that he was paid $5,000, plus additional support to cover meetings with anti-gun groups. In fact, the audio files start with an introduction that asks listeners to support their work. The bio for Williams makes no mention of the fact that he’s a Joyce Journalism Fellow, another clue that would tip listeners off to any potential bias in his articles funded by the Foundation.

There’s no way that Williams and any other reporters involved can claim that their work is free of bias since a stipulation of taking the $5,000 was that their work be written in order to “have a major public policy impact.” In addition to Williams, Joyce was willing to fund up to six other writers or broadcasters who were based “in midwest and northeast region with priority given to journalists in Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.” Since Joyce doesn’t appear to list them, the coordinating organization doesn’t list them, and no results turn up on media sites for titles and terms such as “Joyce Journalism Fellow,” it could be hard to figure out exactly who was paid for these planted stories.

In addition to outright paying for coverage at the rate of $5,000 per story or series, Joyce also funded travel & networking opportunities for their grantees to hang out with the leaders of anti-gun groups. The Foundation describes it rather innocuously:

To kick off the project, the Center will hold regional hands-on workshops for the selected reporters.

In reality, fellows were flown to Chicago for a workshop that primarily featured these speakers:

  • Tom Diaz, Violence Policy Center
  • Ben Van Houten, Legal Community Against Violence
  • Rose Cheney, Firearm Injury Center
  • Ben Hayes, ATF
  • Nicholas Roti, Chicago PD CAGE (Chicago Anti-Gun Enforcement) program

Yet, not a single mention of the obvious slant in speakers by Williams in his notebook entry for the trip. It begs to question whether any of the fellows raised any serious concerns about this project whatsoever.

Beyond the initially purchased stories, this fellowship program from Joyce is seeking to create a long term network of journalists working to advance their public policy initiatives. Take a look at some of the other resources that Joyce helped fund to keep them on a short leash:

To help facilitate the reporting program, the Center will also provide research assistance to help the Fellows gather data, develop contacts, and manage resources on gun violence stories. The Center will also create online tools for project participants to exchange information with colleagues and post questions for Center trainers and administrators. An electronic library containing articles, research, and media sources will be developed for peer journalists unaffiliated with the project.

Gee, the funders looking to advance policy in a specific direction set up a database of source material for the fellows to use – there’s no chance of bias there, is there? But they are members of the esteemed fourth estate, so we’re supposed to trust them instead of asking them for a bit of honesty or disclosure in this case.

If we want a general guide to where the articles bought by Joyce ended up, we can probably get a pretty good idea from the mention in the Williams notebook that one anti-gun group focused on gun laws in Minnesota, Illinois, Ohio, and Michigan. If you see any obviously biased feature stories dated from late last fall to the end of this month turn up in those states, then you likely have a Joyce-funded reporter on your hands. Just don’t expect them to reveal that fact.

An Illinois Lobbyist They Can Ill Afford

Thirdpower points out that the Brady Campaign has registered a lobbyist in Illinois. Since this is lobbying activity, this has to happen under the auspices of the Campaign, their 501(c)(4), rather than Brady Center. Brady Campaign has, financially, been on the ropes. The fact that they felt the need to hire outside help in Illinois is great. Keep pushing guys!

Brainless Puff Piece from UK Daily Mail

A one-off gaudy Hello Kitty gun apparently makes a trend, but as much as I hate the gun, I love this reaction:

Dee Edwards, co-founder of the charity Mothers Against Murder and Aggression said: ‘I am utterly disgusted by this.

‘It is not fashion, it is not style, it is … glorifying guns and making them seem acceptable.

Yes. That’s exactly what we’re doing. And we’re going to keep doing it, Ms. Edwards, until everyone else sees you for the hysterical, ridiculous person you are.