Bryan Miller Protests Nugent

Says Bryan Miller:

“Nugent is a promoter of violence,” said Miller, a Haddonfield, N.J, native whose brother died in a 1994 shooting.

“He believes guns are the way you settle conflict. That’s immoral.”

By that standard the Haddonfield, New Jersey police are promoters of violence.  They aren’t carrying firearms to tickle criminals into submission, they are meant to defend the officers.  Miller doesn’t seem to get the difference between predatory violence, and protective violence.

The odd thing is that we only had 150 people for Nugent.  He usually draws big crowds.  I suspect the 150 dollars a head was a bit rich for his fan base.  Still, the anti-gun protesters managed sixteen, and I’m betting most of them are friends of Miller.  Looks like the Quakers are involved too:

“When Jesus said love your enemies, I think he probably meant don’t kill them,” said Joan Huston, of Elizabethtown. “I feel really sad when I hear God’s name in connection with [gun rights].”

This is not new.  Quakers have been trying to disarm Pennsylvanians for years.  Years ago, back when this was wild country, Quakers were happy to free ride off other folks’ willingness to use protective violence.  In the 20th century, they advocate disarmament, for Quaker and non-Quaker alike.  People always talk about the religious right wanting to use government shove their beliefs down everyone else’s throats.  Do those same folks want to condemn the Quaker religious left for doing the same thing?

And What’s Todd Palin? Chopped Liver?

A funny thing happened on the way to Phoenix…

As I’ve been planning the Second Amendment Blog Bash, I thought it would be fun to post polls on the sidebar of the website for people to vote when they check he latest information. It’s not exactly on par with a rocking night out, but it was meant to get people excited about the Bash.

Unfortunately, I’ve learned that diehard GOP voters will hijack any poll and spam the site with fake votes and crazy comments. The first came from Mitt Romney supporters. They not only shared a link on the top Mitt websites, but one actually set up some kind of a script to vote for Mitt as their favorite invited speaker about five times every second. I changed the poll and banned everyone who voted for him after I got the first hit from the site. I also complained to the main culprits and they did honor my request to remove the links.

The latest is from a group of rabid Sarah Palin fans. Now, I like Sarah Palin. I became a much more active campaign volunteer once she was on the ticket. We waited to put a McCain sign out in the lawn until she was on the ticket. But, when people start using the Bash site comments to tell me about why they believe she’s G-d, things get a little creepy. So, again, when the kiddies over at TeamSarah.org started spamming the poll (one vote a minute – a little less demanding on the server, thank goodness), it was changed and a note went up asking them to stop. So far, they have refused to honor my registration so I can ask them to remove the link, and I’m not sure they will ever acknowledge it.

But, in telling you this, I pose the question that Sebastian asked me when I told him about the creepy comments: If Sarah is G-d, then what does that make Todd Palin?

Worst! Epidemic! Ever!

The Mexican Swine Flu is coming!

The CDC and World Health Organization are concerned about the spread of the swine flu and it possibly being a new stronger strain of the virus because of its spread and toll in Mexico City. There also are fears the swine flu could prompt a flu pandemic that hits across numerous countries.

Lock yourselves inside.  When the undead begin roaming the streets, you know what to do!

Machine Guns Found

Back last December, I reported on a Class III SOT who had 200 grand worth of inventory stolen while he grabbed a bite to eat.  Apparently all but 8 of those guns have been recovered, and the guy who was involved in stealing and trafficking them is being indicted by the Feds.

I’m happy they are off the streets and back in the hands of collectors.  Once they hit the streets, they become worth nothing, except to criminals.  What you really pay for is that entry in the NTRFR that says it’s yours.

This Year’s NRA Election Is Over

The 2009 NRA Board Elections are now at an end.  Today is the ballot deadline.  Ballots received after today will not count.  I would like to thank Senator Feinstein, President Obama and his Chief of Staff for helping remind NRA members to get their ballots in.  I would also like to thank our endorsed candidates who took the time to answer some of our questions.  We will find out the results of the election at NRA’s Annual Meeting, which I will dutifully report to you.

Blast From the Past

Time lists this article as being from 2001, but it’s clearly not.  It’s from January 1990.  It talks about J. Warren Cassidy being Executive Vice President of NRA, who resigned in 1991, and was replaced by Wayne LaPierre.  Joe Foss is still NRA President.  The best date for the article is it references the 1989 Stockton Massacre as happening “a week ago last year”.

Read the whole thing.  It gives a snapshot in time of NRA, at a time when membership was declining, the inevitable passage of the Brady Bill and Assault Weapons Bans were on the horizon, and the future of NRA seemed more uncertain.  In those days, there was plenty of infighting between, I guess what we today would call the “pragmatic” faction of NRA, and the more hard line “Knoxers.”

The NRA of today has considerably less infighting in comparison to those days, but the political climate is much better.  That sounds crazy considering who controls Congress and who’s in the White House, but those were really dark days.  The media pointed to declining NRA membership as evidence of its losing support among mainstream gun owners.  The only people who suggest NRA is impotent now are the Brady Campaign, and my Governor.  I don’t think anyone really believes them.

Castle Doctrine Introduced

In the Pennsylvania Senate, by Senator Alloway.  I’m going to guess the Republican controlled Senate is an easier route of introduction.  Gets it to the House without having to wrangle through Democrat controlled committees.   Chances are we can pass this, but Rendell can always veto it, and probably will.  Still, it will force the issue, and make the Democratic nominee for governor, whoever that turns out to be, take a stand on that issue.  We probably already know that Corbett, who is the presumed GOP nominee, will support its passage.

Lautenberg’s Gun Show Language

The language is now available Thomas for Lautenberg’s gun show bill.  What’s interesting is that it doesn’t target private sales in general, but targets only gun shows.  In my opinion, it is intended to destroy gun shows, or at least seriously reduce their numbers, and frustrate being able to put them on.  Let’s take a look:

  1. A gun show, under this law, is defined as an event where more than 20% of vendors are selling firearms, where there are more than 10 people selling firearms, and when there are more than 50 firearms offered for sale.   This will probably cause flea markets and any place that’s not a licensed gun show to ban people from selling guns.
  2. Gun show promoters have to register with the attorney general according to regulations and fees defined by him.  They could make the fee 100,000 dollars.  The bill does not stipulate a fee.  This is entirely unacceptable.
  3. Anyone selling a gun at a gun show would have to show photo ID, be entered into a ledger, and be required to sign off on their requirements under this chapter.  This is true even if you’re just exhibiting a gun.  You don’t have to be selling it.  The promoter would keep the ledger, but would be required to keep it for as long as the attorney general stipulates.
  4. All transfers would be required to be transferred through a federally licensed dealer. It is a crime both on the transferors and transferees part for not doing so.  Federal Firearms Licensees will be required to enter details about the transaction into a bound book of some kind.  The bill also stipulates a separate form other than 4473, it seems. This new federal form will be reported to ATF.  They won’t require any identifying information about the transferees.  Multiple handgun purchase forms are required for these transactions.
  5. FFLs who transfer a firearm at a show will have to include a few transfer report form, separate from the current paperwork that records that a transfer has taken place.  What?
  6. Penalties go up to five years for doing a private transfer at a gun show, that goes for promoters who don’t do everything right too.
  7. Penalties of up to five years in prison are also added on to dealers who knowingly make a false record.

This law is aimed squarely at making gun shows so legally burdensome that no one in their right mind would organize one, and creating new criminal penalties for dealers who keep bad records. This must be absolutely opposed.  It looks like our opponents, rather than going for the whole private sale caboodle, have decided to specifically target gun shows.

Remember, in terms of organization, gun shows are for us what churches are to religious conservatives.  If they shut down gun shows, or make them entirely too legally burdensome to operate, they shut down a key locus of our ability to politically organize.  That’s exactly what the intent of this bill is.  Our opponents may be on the ropes, but they aren’t stupid.  It can’t be allowed to pass.

UPDATE: NRA offers its interpretation of this bill, saying it will do, among other things, make Camp Perry into a gun show.  This is not an unreasonable interpretation of the law.  Also:

If you are at home with a collection of fifty or more firearms, it would be a five-year felony to “offer” or “exchange” a single gun — even between family or friends — unless you first registered with the BATFE and paid a fee, the amount of which would be at BATFE’s discretion.

Checking back with the language of the bill, this is indeed the case.  There is no exception for homes.

UPDATE: More from NRA:

Even talking about a gun at an “event” could be seen as an “offer” to sell a gun. Even if you are not a dealer, but you display a gun at a gun show, and then months later sell the gun to someone you met at the show, you would be subject to the same requirements as if you had completed the sale at the gun show.

This is true.  It makes no distinction for venue.  If you make an offer to sell at any “event” or “gun show”, then later transfer them somewhere else, you’re still a felon.  Here’s the real zinger.  If you went to a “gun show” and offered to sell an SKS to your buddy while at the guns show, then a month later went to an FFL and did the transfer, with background check, 4473, and everything else, sorry, you’re still a felon, because you didn’t fill out the extra gun show transfer paperwork!

Folks, Frank Lautenberg has been in the Senate a long time.  He knows how to write legislation.  This is meant to put gun owners, where, in his mind, we belong — in federal prison.