Jobs “Created or Saved”

This is one great way to pad the numbers on the stimulus – add in jobs that were never in jeopardy:

If you were a tenured professor who happened to receive stimulus dollars as part of work on some research project, then your job, on this guidance, was counted as “created or saved.” Many universities, says the article, are “including tenured academics in their ‘jobs created and saved’ numbers even though their jobs were already guaranteed for life.”

On the positive side, it would seem we can then claim that Obama saved or created jobs for some of the best minds in the Second Amendment academic community.

Russians Building Up Defenses

Russia turns a blind eye to all sorts of copyright violations, but they are mounting a defense for one that they won’t tolerate anymore.

Russia will step up action to defend the copyright of the Kalashnikov, which is made without license by dozens of manufacturers around the world, said Anatoly Isaikin, the chief of the nation’s state arms-trading monopoly.

The Kalashnikov has become the world’s most widely distributed weapon, with some 100 million made in the 60 years since the AK-47 went into serial production, but only about half of them are the genuine, locally made article. …

Isaikin said his company, Rosoboronexport, was working to draft agreements with foreign countries that would protect copyright for Kalashnikovs and other Russian weapons. There are about 30 foreign manufacturers who are currently making Kalashnikovs, he said.

”Together with other federal structures, we are taking steps to establish order,” Isaikin said.

The Soviet Union paid little attention to copyright laws, easily handing out arms production licenses to its satellites in eastern Europe and elsewhere. The Cold War-era production licenses have long-since expired, but production has continued.

It wasn’t until 1997 that the Izhmash factory in the Ural Mountains city of Izhevsk, which makes Kalashnikovs, secured a state patent for the weapon and began pressing foreign manufacturers to respect its copyright.

Izhmash director Vladimir Grodetsky said the company has faced an uphill battle, loosing an estimated $400 million to $500 million a year from counterfeit Kalashnikov makers.

I’m sure there’s an “In Soviet Russia…” joke in there somewhere, but I simply cannot think of a good one at the moment.

Thinking Strategically

Jim Shepherd has a rundown of various attempts to get guns into the mainstream media outlets as of late. We all know about the recent Bushmaster Maxim ad, but others in the outdoor communication world have been beating down that path of new outlets for a while now. And we may see some payoff soon:

But the challenges of convincing other networks to carry outdoor programming – especially programming that’s not strictly fishing and hunting, is a constant struggle. Fox Sports, for example, won’t accept “gun shows” on their national network. Despite that refusal, they will their regional networks to accept those shows. Others, like ESPN, will accept hunting shows, but have absolutely nothing to do with handguns or pure shooting. In both instances, execs say it’s an owner’s policy (Disney owns ESPN), but don’t seem inclined to buck the trend.

Next year, however, the obvious concern of average Americans over their personal safety isn’t being ignored. A new two-hour programming block dedicated to the topic of self-defense, awareness and crime avoidance will air on a network that has not accepted any prior shooting programming.

We’re not cleared to say much more about it, but having seen the demo and spoken with sponsors already committed to the programming, it looks like one more step toward breaking down some resistance to shooting programming will happen. This programming block seems well-considered and a represents a significant breakthrough in getting elemental gun issues before the general viewing public. It’s also part of a broad media strategy, something that seems an afterthought for many other programs.

With a serious media strategy, there’s a good chance it can work.

What You Get for Your Dollars

As I know I’ve mentioned in the past, NRA members who live in solidly pro-gun media markets and political districts sometimes don’t get to see much of what happens to their donations to NRA-PVF. By request, here are two ads NRA is running in the Virginia gubernatorial race:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bStaCubnNZk[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Bl6nBT1E8Q[/youtube]

To keep these ads on the air, and to support other voter mobilization efforts, consider throwing a few bucks to the Political Victory Fund. Because of campaign finance laws, it’s not easy to post a direct link here. So instead login at NRAPVF.org and then a donate button will appear on the right-hand menu. All you need is your member number to log in, and a piece of plastic to donate online.

HSUS to Regulate Rodent Control

No longer will lethal rodent control be allowed in DC homes – that is, unless you can prove that the public safety is in jeopardy. You would also have to develop a strategy to “preserve family units” of pests. If you find bats on your property in winter, you cannot disturb them until they come out of hibernation in the spring. Should there be 10 bats, you’ll need a special permit to be rid of them.

No, I am not joking. This is the new standard being drafted by HSUS in the District.

Most Gun Owners Believe Obama Wants Their Guns

CS monitor reports on a new Gallup poll. It’s interesting how the media always pooh poohs this, as if the guy doesn’t have an awful record on the issue before coming into the White House. I mean, he voted against a bill that would have decriminalized defending your home with a handgun as State Senator. Even I think he’d like to take my guns, I just think he’s smart enough to know it’ll cost him politically. I don’t think he’s changed his mind on guns, I just think he’s being a smart politician.

If Only those Redneck Virginia Politicians Would Listen to Us…

The New York Times laments that Virginia’s leading candidates are generally pro-gun. Clearly, it is the NYT’s role to intervene in the Virginia elections and tell politicians that they need to listen to biased polls and the NYC mayor.

The loophole is no laughing matter, although the National Rifle Association is using a fictitious Soprano-like “Noo Yawker” to bolster Bob McDonnell, the Republican candidate for governor who favors leaving the loophole unchanged. “Fuhgeddaboud your freedoms” if Mr. McDonnell is not elected, the faux Mafioso warns Virginians in a TV ad. It’s payback for Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s recent stings documenting how Virginian dealers are a major conduit for crime guns in New York City.

Clearly, the NRA members in Virginia don’t care about their communities, otherwise they wouldn’t be running ads making fun of New Yorkers. However, the elite of New York City can clearly be counted on to know and understand the Virginia communities and respect the rights of Virginia residents – just like the rights of their own neighbors are respected!

Massachusetts Clubs Resisting Patrick’s Plan

Via the Outdoor Press Room, it looks like gun clubs in Massachusetts are doing what they can to resist Governor Patrick’s plan to effectively shut them down. It’s for our own good, according to Governor Patrick:

He said the new rules are not a response to the Westfield accident per se, but a comprehensive package to create a safer environment for those who use guns.

Who asked you? I’ve never felt unsafe at any of our local clubs. I imagine it’s the same way in Massachusetts. This is the typical motus operandi of the gun control movement. Take something that sounds completely reasonable to your average non-knowing person, which is that clubs don’t have a whole lot of money, typically, and regularly hold public events as part of their mission to promote the shooting sports. I mean, who could possibly object to having a police detail at your local smallbore match?

For the Inner Ahab

You too can now own your own whaling harpoon. I’m not even sure what the legalities are. I would imagine it’s a destructive device. It’s also in Norway. It’s not impossible to get a destructive device imported, but I can’t imagine how much paperwork you’d have to do to get this into the country, and in your legal possession.

UPDATE: Actually, looking at how they work, I’m not sure it’s a destructive device, and may not actually be regulated at all.