Wisconsin Issues

In addition to Wisconsin considering microstamping legislation, it looks like Ed Rendell’s buddy, Governor Jim Doyle of Wisconsin, is pushing some of the same issues.  He’s suggesting local communities be allowed to pass their own ordinances regulating firearms.  The attorney general recently issued an opinion reminding law enforcement officials that carrying firearms openly was lawful in the State of Wisconsin.  No matter though, the Milwaukee Police Chief says he’ll just ignore it.

“My message to my troops is if you see anybody carrying a gun on the streets of Milwaukee, we’ll put them on the ground, take the gun away and then decide whether you have a right to carry it,” Flynn said. “Maybe I’ll end up with a protest of cowboys. In the meantime, I’ve got serious offenders with access to handguns. It’s irresponsible to send a message to them that if they just carry it openly no one can bother them.”

How many gang bangers, shooting it out on the streets of Milwaukee, are openly carrying their gat?  It’s a lawful activity, and Wisconsin’s recent right to bear arms constitutional provision, passed in 1998, protects that right from local interference.

If the City of Milwaukee wants to deal with multiple federal civil rights suits, under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code, they’re welcome.  In fact, I dare him to do what he’s suggesting.  I would remind Cheif Ed Flynn that Section 1983 allows a plantiff to sue you personally, not just you in your official capacity, for violation of civil rights.  So if you want to end up paying for a gun rights activist’s ammo supply for the rest of his life, I’d urge the City to get Flynn on a leash now, while this can still be handled cheaply.  Once faces start hitting concrete, all bets are off.

I would urge open carry activists in Wisconsin to laywer up.  Get good ones who know how to handle 1983 suits.  Plan this out.  Don’t just tell every yahoo to open carry in downtown Milwaukee and then end up creating a mess.

Lautenberg Update

His bill is worse than a mere ban on private sales:

  • gun show promoters to register with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), maintain a list of vendors at all gun shows and ensure that all vendors acknowledge receipt of information about their legal obligations; and
  • federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to submit information, including the manufacturer/importer, model and serial number of firearms transferred at gun shows to the ATF’s National Tracing Center (NTC).  No personal information about either the seller or the purchaser would be given to the ATF.  Instead, as under current law, FFLs would maintain personal information in their files.  The National Tracing Center would request personal information from an FFL only if a firearm becomes the subject of a law enforcement trace request.

This would likely overwhelm ATF’s trace system, and make data from it nearly useless, in terms of patterns of traced guns.  I wouldn’t be surprised to see ATF come out against this.  Of course, it could mean they need to hire more staff, and get a nice shiny new tracing system, so the perverse bureaucratic incentives could work out in its favor too.

Ooops!

The Four Corners monument is apparently off by 2 1/2 miles.  The initial survey that established the borders of those states in 1868 was off.  It would seem that all the maps would be off too, in that case.  If that’s true, I would imagine the bigger story is probably that some folks who believed they lived in one state will now find out they live in another.

I imagine this is going to have implications for water rights, considering the San Juan river now is going through states it wasn’t originally thought to be going through.  There’s an old saying in the west that whiskey is for drinking and water is for fightin’.  If this survey is correct, I would say Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Utah are going to be fighting for some time.

UPDATE: Actual location of the border is centered on this map here.  There’s going to be a lot of people affected.  Several towns.

UPDATE: Looks like the controlling law here was the Arizona Organic Act of 1863.

That all that part of the present Territory of New Mexico situate west of a line running due south from the point where the southwest corner of the Territory of Colorado joins the territory of New Mexico.

There would then have to be an act declaring what the border between Colorado and New Mexico territories was supposed to be.  I’ll see if I can find that.

UPDATE: Yep.  Congress passed “An Act to provide a termporary Government for the Territory of Colorado” passed in 1861:

That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the following limits, viz: commencing on the thirty-seventh parallel of north latitude, where the twenty-fifth meridian of longitude west from Washington crosses the same; thence north on said meridian to the forty-first parallel of north latitude; thence along and parallel west to the thirty-second meridian of longitude west from Washington; thence south on said meridian to the northern line of New Mexico; thence along the thirty-seventh parallel of north latitude to the place of beginning, be and the same is hereby erected into a temporary government by the name of the Territory of Colorado.

Washington is located at 77 longitude west, so that would indeed put the southwest corner of the Colorado Territory at 109 longitude west.   Hell, even Google Earth says it’s off.  Looks like Arizona and Utah just got more territory, and New Mexico and Colorado will lose some.  Of course, I don’t doubt this matter will go to court, and be settled there, but from a cartological point of view, the border seems to be wrong.

UPDATE: Very interesting Wikipedia entry on public land surveys.

Lautenberg Pushing Private Transfer Ban

Frank Lautenberg held a very Brady press conference yesterday, saying he’ll introduce legislation to end the “gun show loophole,” which is code speak for making it a federal crime to sell or give a gun to your shooting buddy or family member.  Since we were in Harrisburg yesterday, we didn’t get a chance to report on this while it was breaking.  Virginia Shooting Sports Association has a pretty thorough rundown.

I would also point out that we have a ban on private transfers on handguns here in Pennsylvania.  It is impossible to legally obtain a pistol without a background check. Yet Our gun laws are constantly touted as “ineffective” and “insufficient” by those pushing for more.   The exceedingly high crime rate in Philadelphia is always pointed to as an example of that.  It’s too easy to violate the law, and too difficult to enforce it.  It will only be obeyed by those who know the law, and are interested in complying with it.  Which is to say, not the people murdering police officers in Philadelphia.

1000+ On Rotunda!

All in all, I’d say it was a very successful day.  This was, without a doubt, the largest rally of any of the past ones I’ve attended.  I’d estimate turnout of over 1000.  The Capitol Police said they were turning away people because they couldn’t fit them all on the rotunda.

I checked my Glock and Kel-Tec with the Capitol Police when I came in, and they had to escort me to their lockers downstairs in their offices, because the arms locker by the security checkpoint had overflowed.  I was a bit confused about how they handled the security checkpoint.  I declared my firearm, and the officer asked me to empty stuff onto the x-ray belt.  I started pulling my KelTec out (with the holster), and had it in my hand and he corrected me not to put the gun (in the holster) on the x-ray belt.  He waved me to go through the metal detector, which beeps like all hell because I had two guns on me.  It is not an instinctive act to go through metal detectors while armed, and I wanted to be sure I understood the instructions correctly.  Got escorted downstairs, and got a receipt for the guns.  Checking out was no problem.  Show driver’s license, show LTC, verify serial numbers matched the receipt, and we’re good to go.

I’m happy to report that we seem to be continuing the tradition of PAFOA people getting screamed out of Babbett Joseoph’s office.  She shouted some hate at a group this year too, saying “I think you people are crazy.”  Apparently never having looked in a mirror herself.  Most of the other Philadelphia politicians who are against us are cordial, and hear us out.  Not her!  Bitter and I stopped in to a few of our area politicians who have been supportive to introduce ourselves, and talk about the issue, and our concerns, and explain what we do and what we can offer them.  The Philadelphia suburbs are changing politically, and we’re not going to hold on to them if we don’t get organized.  Remember, Rendell was able to buck NRA by keeping quiet on guns, and by playing up to his natural base in the Philadelphia suburbs.  We are the hinge on which the state pivots.  We lose the Philly suburban legislators on guns, and we lose the state.  That’s what’s at stake in our districts.

Had a nice talk with NRA’s State Liaison, John Hohenwarter.   Bitter and I were looking for some advice on how to get connected with people and other activists he might know in our area.  We’re really looking to have a good ground game together for the 2010 elections.

Met With the State Rep

We met with our State Representative, Frank Farry, while we were in Harrisburg.  We had a nice conversation with him on the issues, and I think we have much common ground.  Representative Farry will be a solid legislator on our issue if we can help him stay in office for the next couple of terms, and get his seat a little safer.

It’s challenging being in a suburban district, in a relatively anti-gun media market, and he’ll no doubt be under a lot of pressure to mediate his stand.  We seem to be off to a good start.  He told a story of an NRA member who took his magazine into the voting booth at the same time Rep. Farry was voting himself.  On the way out the man said “I was with you until I saw this in the magazine,” referring to the giant “?” next to his name, because his campaign manager didn’t get the NRA questionaire in on time.  It’s because of guys like that, who take their magazines into the voting booth, that we’re still in good shape.  Now, if Representative Farry, and dozens of other suburban lawmakers stand with us on issues, it is incumbent on us to do everything we can to help them fight off challengers to their seats, and those challengers will surely come.  This is a tough issue in the suburbs, and politicians are balancing a lot of issues.  Particularly for new legislators, we have to be especially proactive at keeping them on our side.

Markell Looking to Screw First State Gun Owners

Looks like newly elected Delaware Governor Jack Markell is joining his buddy Ed Rendell in denouncing firearms that look like assault weapons.

Markell’s gun initiatives include:

  • Banning what gun-control advocates call assault weapons, semiautomatic rifles with military characteristics such as large-capacity magazines, flash suppressors and pistol grips or thumbhole stocks.
  • Exempting Wilmington from the state law that prohibits counties and municipalities from enacting gun ordinances.
  • Limiting what he termed “bulk purchases” of handguns.
  • Closing the “gun-show loophole.” Licensed firearms dealers selling at gun shows must perform the state and federal background checks required by law.

I’m sure a lot of competitive shooters would be surprised to discover that thumbhole stocks were a dangerous feature to have on their rifles.  There’s a pretty good chance the Governor doesn’t have the votes to get this passed.

“Law-abiding citizens have nothing to fear from any of my proposals on guns,” Markell said, adding that his goal is to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have them.

Yes, which is exactly why you’re talking about banning certain scary looking semi-automatics for everybody, and probably a few non-scary guns if they can get away with it..  Do these people listen to themselves when they talk?