CSM Looks at Why Democrats are Relenting on Guns

The Christian Science Monitor looks at why Democrats are retreating from the gun issue, in a very detailed article that talks to a lot of people on all sides.  It really comes down to the Democrats having made great strides running people who can win in their districts, and in many cases that means you have to be in favor of the Second Amendment.

BTW, the reporter here is the same one that did the article on gun blogs at the NRA Annual Meeting.   I appreciate that’s he’s continuing to offer fair treatment for the subject, and get views from many different sources.

Quote of the Day

From Chris Cox on Kirsten Gillibrand:

“She took law-abiding gun owners in upstate New York for a ride and tossed them into the Hudson on her way into Manhattan.”

I guess as a politician, Senator Gillibrand’s positions are entirely negotiable if the reward is great enough.  There’s another profession that’s true about too.

New Jersey Laws Get in Penn Jillette’s Way

SayUncle has the story.  No, in New Jersey there is no dramatic reenactment or entertainment exception, though I understand that’s been talked about.  New Jersey laws on guns (including air guns) is relatively simple: guns are illegal in New Jersey.  You can only own them and possess them under exceptions to the law.  One of those exceptions is a shooting range, and going directly too and from.  A theater is Atlantic City is not a shooting range, so it’s outside of that exception.  The only way to legally possess a .357 revolver in a theater in Atlantic City is to get a New Jersey License to Carry Firearms, which are not really issued to anyone who’s not well connected, and even the well connected can have a rough time.

Incidentally, New Jersey law can create problems for reenactors, because of the lack of exception for entertainment. Even a flintlock pistol in New Jersey is regulated in the same manner as a Glock.  Muzzleloaders are regulated in a lesser manner than modern rifles and shotguns, but New Jersey’s antique cannon laws alone are several pages.  The laws, taken as a whole, are so complicated even most lawyers don’t understand them, let alone police.  The complexity of it is part of the reason I won’t compete there, even though there are ranges that are still very active, and run good matches.

Sestak May Be In the Race

It’s looking pretty likely Joe Sestak will challenge Arlen Specter in the Democratic primary.  I know NRA doesn’t typically get involved in primary fights, but if Sestak remains the only challenger, this is one to get involved in.  The general election would present a bit of a dilemma for me, but I have no problem working for Specter to help defeat Sestak.  In fact, I wish we could get Sestak out of Congress entirely.

SCCC Speech Banned at Allegheny Community College

Eugene Volokh discusses a case where Students for Concealed Carry on Campus was hushed by campus officials of Allegheny County Community College (the county in Pennsylvania which contains Pittsburgh), which is dubiously constitutional.

UPDATE: SayUncle also has it.

Another Reason The City Won’t Change

Wyatt encounters a person who wants to drop charges because they feel sorry for the criminal.  These are the same people to vote for judges who turn criminals back out on the streets to pillage.  These are also the same people are are OK with cutting cops on the street first, rather than last.  I expect Philadelphia will follow Toledo in this regard.

Acquitted

It appears a judge aquitted the Colosimo Five of all tresspassing charges.  To the credit of the District Attorney:

In his closing statement, Assistant District Attorney Guy D’Andrea said the case was “about individuals going to a private person’s business to disrupt that business.”

This is why Philadelphia is a lawless city.  But I suppose it’s fitting.  In a city who refuses to prosecute and lock up people who do all manner of serious crimes, it would have been kind of odd to prosecute someone for trespassing, would it?

I would invite Mr. Colosimo to come out to the suburbs, where we still believe that disrupting someone’s business and tresspassing on their property unlawfully is a crime, but then the other side would win, wouldn’t they?  In that instance, I’m sorry Mr. Colosimo can’t find justice, but that’s Philadelphia for you.

Sotomayor Confirmation

This might give some indication of where people will fall in the Sotomayor confirmation vote for the Supreme Court.  In looking at the chances of defeating Sotomayer, you’d basically have to assess the committee.  If she hits the floor, she’s confirmed.  Of the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Hatch was the only yes vote, but the Democrats only need one vote from the minority party to get her out of committee.  Sessions, who is now the ranking member of the committee voted no on her way back in 1998.  Grassley and Kyl both voted against her.  The rest were not in the Senate when she was voted on back in 1998.  It might be possible for the GOP to mount a protest.

But there are other factors that will be considered, as to whether the GOP will put up more than token resistance against Sotomayor, and that’s whether or not what could come in her wake might be worse.  You’re not going to get a conservative pick out of this administration, or even a moderate pick.  Sotomayor will no doubt be a reliable left vote on The Court, but there are other people in the realm of possible choices who would also be reliably left, but who have the intellectual background to be leaders on The Court.  The question will be, as bad as Sotomayor might be, could what follows behind her be worse?  The answer might very well be yes, and the GOP might decide to give in on this one.  The real danger for conservatives, and for Second Amendment activists, is that Obama gets to replace one of the Heller five with a reliably left-voting justice.  Let’s hope, no pray, that Justice Kennedy and Justice Scalia can hold on until this long national nightmare is over.

Some Things Never Change

Dave Markowitz shows us us a cartoon from the 1930s that would be just as fitting today.  It always amazes me how much more detailed cartoons from the period seemed compared to today.  Interesting elements in the cartoon for sure.

One one side you have what appears to be Trotsky, writing out a plan to destroy the United States, and on the other Stalin, noticing how red the sunset is getting.  In the cart you have Henry A. Wallace, who was Roosevelt’s Secretary of Agriculture at the time.  You know, the guy running around telling people they couldn’t grow their own wheat?  Then you had Harold L. Ickes, who was Secretary of the Interior under Roosevelt, who administered many of the New Deal programs.  Donald Richberg was one of the architects of the New Deal, having been a drafter of the National Industrial Recovery Act, and administrator of the National Recovery Administration.  The NRA makes what Obama’s doing with GM and Chrysler look like child’s play.  Driving the wagon, you have Rexford Tugwell, who I can’t help but notice bears a resemblance to Rahm Emmanuel.  Tugwell was part of Roosevelt’s “Brain Trust,” which was a group of smart people who, if we could just get together in one room, were clearly all smart enough to centrally plan the national economy.

It’s amazing how history repeats itself.  But I don’t worry about Obama, really, at least not in terms of being an FDR style game changer.  Note the wagon says “the soundest government in the world.”   Does anyone believe that applies to our pre-Obama government?  No.  This bunch is taking over just as Uncle Sam’s credit card is about to max out, and that’s going to put the kibosh on how far he can really take it.