If you’ve been following the news over the last year or so, Canada’s not crazy about this wild-and-crazy free speech stuff, especially if it offends Muslims, which is why best-selling author Mark Steyn got charged with “hate speech” in Canada for his wildly poplar book AMERICA ALONE, which speculated that Europe, including England, would be Islamic countries within 20 years if for no other reason that demographics. So the Canadians, tired of the endless, unregulated speech pouring over the border from the south, petition the United States government to place strict regulation on speech, lest it slip over the border and annoy the LeBatts crowd, maybe licensing and strictly monitoring connections to the Internet, prior restraint of radio and television broadcasts to give the U.S. government a chance to make sure the content is Canada A-Okay, etc.Should we do that to help our Poor Cold Brothers and Sisters?
Category: Guns
Federal Lands Bill Up Today
The Federal Lands Omnibus bill will be coming up again in the House today under the special rules that does not allow amendments, but requires a 2/3rd super-majority for passage. Last time it was up, it failed by two votes. I alluded to this somewhat when I excoriated GOA over their reaction to it.
The Democrats are back, and with the same suspension of rules, which means they must have picked up the two votes they need to pass it without the pro-gun amendments. I am not optimistic about how this is going to go, but we will see.
This bill will vastly expand the amount of federal land that is under control of the Department of the Interior, and add several new National Parks. This means the amount of federal land where functional firearms are contraband will be increasing greatly. This should demonstrate to folks that while we have many pro-gun Democrats as friends in Congress, the Democratic leadership is still very much against us.
.50 BMG vs. Hard Drives
How many hard drives does it take to stop a round of .50 BMG? Find out…
More Groups Calling for Gun Bans because of Mexico
Add three more groups, in addition to the Brady Campaign, to those on the left calling for more gun control in the name of saving Mexico from its own drug cartels even though ATF says we don’t need it and Democrats in the House have made it clear that no gun control will come out of Congress. Here are quotes from various left-wing groups on the upcoming trips to Mexico by several Cabinet officials and the President:
“They are putting a lot of the cabinet on this, including the president himself,” Andrew Selee, director of the Mexico Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center, told AFP. …
“They see this as an actual shared responsibility, that we have to actually do something about consumption, the money and the guns on our side of the border,” Selee said.
“I think that is a change in focus, actually.”
Vanda Felbab-Brown, a counter-narcotics expert at the Brookings Institution, said it could take years before the administration reaps benefits from its new approach to blunt consumer demand, which she calls the “crux of the problem.”
In the meantime, she expects Clinton and others to cooperate more on choking off the flow of weapons from thousands of weapons stores on the US side of the border, even if she doubts how effective it can be.
“There are many other sources apart from the US, from which the cartels or the trafficking organizations could acquire weapons,” Felbab-Brown told AFP.
“But I think diplomatically it’s very important that the US makes an effort to show to the Mexican authorities as well as to the Mexican public that we share responsibility,” she said.
“Just like we share responsibility for demand, we are aware that we are the source of weapons and we take efforts against them,” she added. …
Christopher Sabatini, a top analyst at the Americas Society and Council of the America, urged the administration to challenge the National Rifle Association gun lobby over the weapons supply stores.
They should “go to the mat on it with the NRA,” he said.
Just because the math seems to be in our favor for the moment, it is clear that anti-gun groups – regardless of their primary mission – are trying to put extreme pressure on Obama to burn up his political capital on gun control, with their favorite being another semi-auto rifle ban. In 2010, we have to make sure that Congress is even more pro-gun so that Obama knows he cannot afford to pick that fight no matter how many how many groups in his base are begging for it.
Update on Springfield Armory Situation
According to today’s Outdoor Wire:
Following a conversation with the top official there, I can report the rumors of the impending demise of the Springfield Armory collection appear to have been greatly exaggerated.
During my extended discussion with Michael Quijano-West, the Superintendent of the Springfield Armory National Historic Site yesterday, Quijano-West made it extremely clear changes were being made, but they were designed to make the armory collection and the accompanying historical archives more accessible, not to lock them away.
“We’re not closing anything,” he said, “in fact, we’ve expanded our operating hours to 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., seven days a week. That certainly wasn’t the case before, hours were inconvenient for visitors. Today, there are only three days on our calendar when we won’t be open: Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Years Day.”
Good to hear! There’s more if you follow the link and scroll down a little more than half way.
Quote of the Day
From the Sherrif’s Office in Placer County, California:
Lt. Mark Reed, who reviews concealed weapons applications in Placer County, said local law enforcement often recommend alternatives to carrying a gun. For example, he said, many people apply because they carry around lots of money as part of their job. “If they could use a courier service, that’d be safer. … If I can offer a safer alternative, it negates the ‘good cause.’ “
This is exactly why you can’t have government officials deciding who does and who doesn’t get to exercise constitutional rights. Can’t issue that battered wife a concealed carry permit, since a safer alternative is to sell her house and move out of state and away from her ex-husband. Why give one to the gay couple? It’s safer just to stay home, and maybe not look so gay. But can we change this? Hell no. O.J. might get a pistol license.
Do California officials really believe there are more potential OJs out there than Deanna Skykes?
How Gun Control Works in Mexico
Clayton Cramer has a pretty good example of how it’s working.
Walking Safety Hazards
Tam’s example here would probably make one think that the Brady Campaign might have a point about mandatory training for possessing firearms, until the first time you’re on a range and get muzzled by a cop. You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink. Doesn’t matter who you are.
International Gun News
Looks like Harper is trying to enlist the help of Ontario sportsmen to help get rid of Canada’s long gun registry, and is calling for a vote to be held on the measure to scrap it. Meanwhile, Rebecca Peters is busy trying to spread gun control in South America.
Also in the news is an apparent “loophole” in the UK’s handgun ban that’s being exploited by gun owners across the pond. I guess you can call it the “Joker Loophole”
Clearly something must be done to avert this menace to society.
Gun Sales Brisk in Central PA
This may turn out to be Obama’s great accomplishment in his first 100 days:
Pochron said he sold twice as many guns Saturday as he normally sells in a weekend. Everything from $250 Taurus .38 Special revolvers to $1,600 AR-15 rifles sold, he said.
In contrast, war memorabilia was moving a little more slowly than usual, vendors said.
I could have paid that much for a pre-ban AR in 2000. I actually hoping the market cools down a bit so I can actually start finding guns and ammo again for something near a reasonable price. Obama doesn’t have to tax guns and ammo, we’re driving the price up just fine on our own.
