Why the Democratic Leadership Wants to Shut us Up

Last night, I spent 2 1/2 hours making phone calls for Tom Corbett for Governor, Pat Toomey for Senate, and Dee Adcock for Congress.  I assumed, when asked to help out, that we would be calling hardcore Republicans to recruit volunteers and get a general sense of how much they know about the specific candidates now that the primaries are over – not formal polling by any means, just a general view of the picture.

Except, I found out when I arrived that the call list was of “soft” Republicans.  They don’t vote in primaries very often, if at all.  They are registered with the party, but not active by any measure.  A few undecideds here and there, a few who didn’t really know about the candidates (especially at the Congressional level, which isn’t a surprise given the district and the lack of a specific media market for that area), and a surprising number of people willing to volunteer for the candidates.

Really, the Democrats really could be in big, big trouble if this is a sign of the times.  Of the 4 other people in the room with me, 2 had never volunteered for phone banks before.  One was moving over into general Republican issues after having mostly volunteering for pro-life groups before.  Keep in mind that it is June.  It’s freakin’ June and nearly half the people in the room are new to volunteering, and I recruited several more from the soft Republican call sheet.  (There were many more callers in the rest of the building, I just eavesdropped on those in my room so I could make more calls instead of chatting it up.)  This can’t be good news for Democrats.

On Saturday, we’ll be doing a walk for the same candidates.  I don’t know if that list is for hard or soft Republicans.  I do know that Obama’s camp is already canvassing soft Democrats, particularly those who just registered last year and/or those who don’t vote in midterms.  So we definitely need to be doing the same on our side.

If you’re in SE Pennsylvania and want an excuse to get a little exercise & help a good cause on Saturday, I’ve got locations for several events in Montgomery, Bucks, and Delaware counties.

I would also suggest to bloggers that helping a campaign out for a couple of hours a month is a great way to get a read on the pulse of your local voters.  It’s absolutely fascinating at times.  Great blog fodder, too. :)

Aiming to Shove DISCLOSE Down Our Throats

Well, it looks like the White House is putting its full weight behind DISCLOSE to get it back on the House calendar for a vote. This is bad news. When this story first broke, I left a comment at Joe’s about some of the writing on the wall that had to go into the decisions that any group was making on the bill (with additional notes):

From what I’m seeing out of other groups, this amendment could very well kill the bill. Here’s what we either know or can safely assume by the actions of this Democratic Congress so far:

  • They have a history of ramming things down the throats of the American people even when there is 50%+ opposition – even very loud and visible opposition.

Health care, anyone?  Try getting people as worked up over campaign finance – an issue that few people know anything about.  Hell, just look at the comments here and on other blogs to show how little people know about the issue.  Besides, you’re also talking about competing with the millions that George Soros has pumped into a “campaign finance reform” public relations effort over many, many years.

  • They pretty much see the writing on the wall that this is their last stand in the House. They could back off to calm people down before the elections so they have a shot at holding on to power or they could try to get every little thing they can right now while they know they have it.

Talking to some DC folks this weekend, this point is even more important than I realized at the time.  Everyone there knows that this won’t pass court muster.  But that’s not the goal.  The goal is to get this into law before this year’s elections so that angry groups are cut off from the voters.  Whether it’s liberal groups turning against Democratic incumbents or conservative groups targeting Democrats, they want them all shut out of the campaign process.  They are actually the ones who are just trying to live to fight another day here.

  • They wanted this bill, and it’s clearly a priority of the President who broke all standards of reasonable protocol by attacking the Supreme Court justices who attended his SOTU. Therefore, fact # 1 becomes more relevant to anyone working on this issue.

See above.  The White House is now getting in to twist some arms.  They are, however, conceding the big group exemption.  My guess is that they are going to tell the far left members of Congress to shut the hell up and get in line – just like they did on healthcare.  And they will do it.  The House leadership & White House will probably promise that the bill will eventually be “fixed” someday, but they really know it won’t and that it will be struck down.  That doesn’t matter, they just need some of it to work this year to try to minimize their losses.

  • NRA could make sure their members were taken of in the event they do ram this through Congress. It may only hold off the fight for another day, but come January, we’ll at least have a friendlier House – even if we don’t take full control of it back. In two more years, we may have a friendly White House & Congress to gut this thing.

The big group exemption makes sure gun owners can still be heard on Election Day.  I hate it, but it at least makes sure our concerns don’t go down the tubes this year while we wait on the courts to (hopefully) throw the law out or a future Congress & president to gut it.

  • The side benefit to this kind of exemption is the added attention that could kill the bill in all forms. The outrage is there from the left. But, looking back at # 1, NRA donors are still safe for now. It’s just a matter of whether Pelosi, Schumer & Obama are so confident to stick their tongues out at the left and yell, “What are you going to do, vote Republican? Just take it with a smile and vote for us again in November.” Based on the “hell no” Van Hollen gave to any union exemption last night, I tend to think they’re going to try and ram it down everyone’s throats even over the objections of their base.

This is may still be the case.  The opposition may be the reason the House cut their calendar by a week this year – always a good thing to get the politicians out of DC.  However, with the White House making the noises they are about how it’s not a “perfect” bill, but they will take it, it does appear they are telling their base to shut the hell up and get out of the way.

Now, there is still room for those of you who fall in the general conservative category to fight this.  If you live in a Blue Dog district, get on the damn phone right now.  If you live in a far left district, get on the phone now and tell them to kill the bill – leaving them to assume you’re part of the base.  If you live in a GOP district, there’s a good chance that they will oppose it, but get on the phone anyway because we can’t afford to have any stray.  You know the Democrats can afford to have a few wander off the reservation, but the Republicans can’t afford it.  And when you’re dealing with literally hundreds of millions invested into convincing the public that anything called “campaign finance reform” is a good idea, it could be a tough fight.  Whether we like it not, that’s the political reality of the moment.  We have to figure out how to beat them anyway.

    Burn, Baby, Burn

    The Democrats new choice to take the Pennsylvania chair has an interesting name, that is hopefully prognostic, given the openly gun control supporting folks running on the Dem ticket in the state wide races this year. But we’re happy the MAIG mayor lost her bid for the position.

    We have no idea where Jim Burn stands on the Second Amendment, but we’re hopeful being from Allegheny County, he does not follow the current trend of going against us.

    This Week’s Top Shot

    I think Les Jones and I are pretty much of the same mind on this episode. Next week is shoot, no shoot scenarios, a topic I sincerely hope Caleb has improved on since I last shot with him. My dad, who is also not a shooter and never owned a gun (I do not come from a gun owning household) is watching the show as well. I continue to agree this show is great PR for the shooting sports.

    How Brownell’s Tests Magazines

    Fun video from Brownells about their magazine testing. The closed captioning is funny. But I have to wonder how many M16/M4 barrels and gas tubes they end up melting:

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15N-YQxfLNg[/youtube]

    These are the civilians magazines they sell being tested. I’m told the actual military magazines are very tightly controlled from factory through deployment. But rumor has it a few of the tan follower military mags have appeared in the wild, which were absconded from military bases. I wouldn’t suggest buying one, because I’m pretty sure it’s some kind of felony or another to buy stolen federal property.

    Photoblog: Fort Washington

    Bitter and I made a last minute trip down to DC this weekend to see two of her friends from college. One is a lobbyist on the hill who we always see when we’re down in DC. The other was in from Minnesota, who Bitter hasn’t seen in a number of years. But as long as we were down there, I decided to do some sightseeing. I’ve always wanted to visit Fort Washington, which was one of the main fortifications that protected the U.S. Capital from attack by water for most of this nation’s history. Built first in 1809, it was in use as a fort to protect the Capital well into the 20th century. I decided to do a photoblog on it. I used to do these somewhat often, but they take a lot of time to put together, so I kind of stopped. But I figured since I got a lot of good gun pics, folks wouldn’t mind too much. I like old artillery pieces, and they keep the ones at Fort Washington in good shape. Click on the pictures for more information.

    Fort Washington National Park along the Potomac

    Alito and Ginsburg Are What’s Left

    Dave Hardy notes that after today’s opinion release that Alito and Ginsburg are the only two remaining justices that have not issued an opinion from this sitting. This worries me because while many have always felt that Kennedy was the weakest link in the Heller Five, I’ve speculated that it’s actually Sam Alito. Let us hope this doesn’t say anything about the outcome of the case.

    Today is Nosy Neighbor Day

    If you have kids, you might find you have a couple of nosy neighbors today. It’s National ASK Day. They like to say that it’s not about gun control, yet their “activists” say that this is about preaching to others about the dangers of owning guns. So, it’s not about taking your guns with force, just trying to be nannies who bother you into giving them up. Because that’s so much better – death by harassment and annoyance.

    At least if we had kids, no one would have to ask. We’re pretty outspoken about our gun ownership in a very polite and “normal” way – whether it’s the NRA stickers, the political volunteer time, or the fact that we’d probably be shooting parents instead of soccer parents, I think we’d send the message pretty loud and clear while sending the right messages about gun ownership being a normal thing.

    Semi-Autos Safe in Finland

    Based on the comments in this article, I think they were trying to ban any gun that held more than one round at all.

    Finland will not impose a full ban on semi-automatic weapons, the interior minister said Monday, rejecting an inquiry commission proposal following two deadly school shootings.

    “I will not take this proposal forward as it is,” Interior Minister Anne Holmlund told national broadcaster YLE in a televised interview.

    “I don’t really believe that the banning of one approach in weapons would be the way to ensure massacres are prevented,” she said, adding several different actions were needed, including giving police wider access to information about gun licence applicants. …

    Finland’s parliament is currently debating a new gun law, and the so-called Kauhajoki inquiry commission had asked Holmlund to back its proposal for a total ban on semi-automatic handguns in the new legislation.

    “Both the school shootings of recent years and the Sello massacre were carried out using semi-automatic weapons.

    “It is clear that single shot weapons would not have created similar victim figures,” Pekka Sauri, chairman of the Kauhajoki commission told YLE.

    Pro-Tip for Dan Onorato: Research

    Sebastian noted that our Democratic nominee for governor is blaming the Republican candidate for a non-loophole that he declares to independently be a loophole – reciprocity. Unfortunately, he kind of got some big freakin’ facts wrong – but as any internet commentator knows, that won’t stop a blowhard from beating his chest indignantly.

    First, there’s the fact that Onorato is specifically blaming Corbett for the Florida reciprocity agreement. Which is funny because the Florida reciprocity agreement was signed in 2001 – before Corbett took office in 2005.

    Second, there’s the fact that under the law, the Attorney General actually has an affirmative duty to sign the agreements. So it doesn’t matter who is in the Attorney General’s office, they are supposed to seek out reciprocity opportunities with other states. The laws for issuance of the other states are all at least as strict as ours – and Florida actually has more requirements to obtain a license than Pennsylvania. So if they can do away with the Florida agreement, the anti-gun folks will just pick another state to target. And it won’t be long before all of our concealed carry agreements are gone.