Josh Sugarman and DC FFLs

Rustmeister points to Josh Sugarman calling out gun bloggers for publishing the information on his federal firearms license:

“The bloggers put my phone number out there, and people have been calling to ask how much I’ll charge to transfer guns,” Sugarman says.

Come on Josh!  It’s a good business opportunity.  It’ll certainly work out far better for you than what you’ve been doing.  Look at who your competition is.  You already have a far more widely recognized name than those other guys.  We’ll even be happy to do some free bloggy marketing for you.  We can hook you up.

Duped by Bad Examples

This blogger seems to have bought the line that the laws passed recently in Georgia and Florida were intended to target airports and Disney, when they are not.  Disney is not exempt from Florida’s law which allows holders of a Florida Concealed Weapons License to leave their guns in their car while at work, but it is not specifically targeted by it.

Nor did the Georgia law in question specifically target airports.  It removed restrictions creating gun free zones out of public transportation vehicles and infrastructure.  Atlanta’s airport has decided the law need not apply to them.  Law or no law, they are determined to arrest people.  That a legal authority is determined to arrest people who have broken no law should scare the hell out of any American.  I should also note that this does not apply to the sterile area of the airport past the security perimeters.  Airline security is a matter of federal law and regulations, and remains in place.

I may not agree with the Florida law mandating that people be permitted to have guns in privately owned parking lots, but nor do I agree with the hysterics from Disney, the media, and a lot of other people, that somehow allowing this is going to lead to bloodbaths.  Despite the Brady Campaign’s machinations, they’ve never been right once.  Not once, about the issue of concealed carry laws leading to more violence.

Hat Tip: Another Gun Blog

Blood and Carnage

That’s what the New England Journal of Medicine is predicting in the wake of Heller.  Yeah, because prior to Heller, criminals were too busy thinking “Sorry guys, it’s a collective right.  We’ll have to wait until it’s individual before we go commit armed robberies.”  But the study does conflate the suicide and homicide numbers.  It also depends on the Loftin study, which has been thoroughly debunked.

The hysterics post Heller have been absolutely unbelievable.  It’s full tilt in the media for the meme that guns do nothing but kill; they aren’t used for sport, and they aren’t used for self-defense.  No.  They cause crime and suicide.  The suicide angle seems something particularly hounded on for some reason, I’m guessing because they know crime rates won’t go up, so they are banking on suicide rates inching up, so they might have a leg to stand on.

Machine Gun Art

I’ll bet it never occured to my friend Jason that he could become a contemporary artist using nothing but his M11 machine pistol and a caseload of 9mm:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZu19hE70hI[/youtube]

Maybe now we can raise a first amendment argument for machine gun ownership ;)

UPDATE: Linoge actually beat me to this one.  He’s actually on my RSS feed, but it doesn’t always embed videos, so I must have just missed it.

NRA Popularity Rises Post Heller

The Supreme Court isn’t the only institution that’s gotten a boost in the polling data from Heller.  I wonder how the Brady Campaign and VPC are polling post Heller?  That pesky constitution’s a bitch isn’t it?

Post Heller Challenges

Eugene Volokh relays a case where a felon tried to raise a second amendment claim and was shot down.  The Court did us a huge favor by taking this off the table immediately.  This makes it far more likely that the people who raise Second Amendment in courts will generally be more sympathetic individuals, rather than career criminals.

Also, there are already have people raising the machine gun issue, which all the legal experts I’ve talked to agree is a dead end.  As one notable legal expert pointed out to me “We got 5-4 on a .38 revolver.”

Then you have a postal employee challenging the ban on firearms in post offices.  The magistrate dismissed the challenge in this case, arguing that:

Indeed, federal law (OSHA) requires employers to abate workplace hazards and encourages employers to take measures to prevent gun-related injuries. Surely, the United States Postal Service would be remiss if it failed to practice what federal law requires. Without question, § 232.1(1) bolsters the United States Postal Service’s zero tolerance for workplace violence and is a regulation designed to maintain safety and order on postal property.

I don’t agree with this one, but there’s always a political solution to this problem.  Professor Volokh has a lot of worthwhile commentary on this one.

This case just seems like a disaster waiting to happen [Edit 7/17/08 – Linked to the wrong item.  A few weeks later, I don’t remember what I intended to link to here, but will try to find again]  Thankfully, we have some very talented people pursuing other incorporation cases.

But hey, at least we don’t have courts still pretending like Heller doesn’t exist, right?  This should be a wake up call to gun owners that Heller hasn’t really settled much.  We have the fight of our lives ahead of us, and I think we seriously need to face the fact that we can either have McCain picks on the federal courts, who has a chance of being good, or perhaps Deval Patrick.  If the thought of that isn’t enough to get you to hold your nose this fall, I don’t know what is.