Bloomberg Throwing Down

Mayor Bloomberg is indicating he’s going to dump some of his personal fortune into the anti-gun effort.

“You know, the NRA doesn’t spend that much money,’’ said Bloomberg during an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press’’ program yesterday. “If you want to beat the NRA you have to go out and get your message out, and it costs money to do that.”

If he wants a fight, we should give him a fight.  He’s dumped 2.9 million into Mayors Against Illegal Guns so far.  There are 450 mayors on that list, and not all of them are in large cities which would be safe from our political power.  I think if he wants a real fight we should give it to him.  Those of us who are in smaller cities and smaller towns, if you have a mayor on that list, let’s get rid of him.  Doesn’t matter if you use the gun issue or not, but we can impact a local election a lot more readily than a national one if we put our minds to it.  The goal would be to make membership in Bloomberg’s organization political suicide for anyone who’s not a big city mayor.

Does Bloomberg really want our grassroots pissed off and fired up about his group of 450 mayors?  I’d start putting pressure on them now.  Between us and the FBI, I think we could cut that number in half, easily.

Pizza Delivery

Pizza guys are typically the last people you want to rob if you’re a criminal in Philadelphia.  Especially if they aren’t running pizzas from a major chain.  Somehow criminals don’t seem to get this message.  Every month or so there’s a story of a pizza man getting robbed, and the robber getting his ass shot.  This is the way it should be, of course, but you’d think after a while they’d try to rob an easier target, like armored car drivers.

Reloads and Backup Guns

Brillianter looks at the subject.  I’ve generally only carried an extra magazine in Winter, when they can be easily concealed.  I carry a Glock 19, which has 15 rounds, and figure that should be enough to get through most self-defense scenarios.  In summer, when I carry the Kel-Tec much more than the Glock, I do usually carry one extra magazine in the pocket.  Ideally you’d carry all the same equipment as a police officer, but for civilians that’s not usually possible to do, and remain comfortable, and discreet.  Go have a read.  You can’t possibly carrying everything, but I like Brillianter’s strategy of thinking about what expands your options and capability, and to what degree, and using that information to decide what tradeoffs to make.

Good News on the Raffle Front

Kevin reports that he and Soldiers Angels have come up with a PayPal free way to continue their raffling of a Para GI Export to raise money for the organization.  This is good both from the standpoint of Soldiers Angels continuing to raise money, and from the standpoint of sticking it to PayPal.

A Failure to Discuss?

This is the pot calling the kettle black.  Bryan Miller says we fail to discuss issues.  This is the pot calling the kettle black.  I will prove him wrong by attempting to engage in reasoned discourse.  I’m sure it will be quickly followed by Reasoned DiscourseTM:

All can agree it is the responsibility of the legislature and administration to mediate between individual privilege and the common good. In this case, the common good is public safety and mediation has resulted in a moderate limit on handgun purchases, to diminish handgun trafficking.

Yes, but we’re not talking about individual privilege.  We’re speaking of a constitutional right.  A right Bryan.  Get used to saying it, because it’s law now.  A right.  Now that we are speaking about the right terms, can you explain to me what other constitutional rights we ration?  If I want to pick up three pistols, one for home, and one for me to carry and for my wife to carry, can you explain why I have to wait three months to do this?   Or have one gun for my primary residence, and one for my beach house, why I have to wait two months to make the purchase?  Remember, it’s a right.  You don’t get to argue I don’t need a gun to defend myself.  The Supreme Court already ruled that out.

The law regulates purchases of handguns only. It in no way affects purchases of long guns, such as hunting rifles and shotguns. Since it is illegal to hunt with handguns in NJ, the law does not affect hunting at all.

It’s illegal to hunt with a handgun in New Jersey, but it is not illegal to hunt with handguns in many other states, and New Jersey hunters may want to avail themselves of hunting opportunities in other states.  But that aside, this isn’t, and never has been about hunting.

While it is true a majority of crime guns recovered in NJ are traced back to states with weaker gun laws, ATF data shows that more than a quarter of recovered crime guns were originally purchased from in-state gun dealers. This is a substantial portion of guns used in crime, which this law is intended to reduce.

Originally purchased how long ago on average?  How many were stolen, rather than purchased?  How many were purchased through multiple purchases?  You don’t know this.

ATF data has also shown that several NJ gun dealers have had both “frequent multiple sales to individuals” and “multiple crime guns traced” to them, indicators of likely trafficking originating at gun stores, according to ATF.

Considering how few dealers are left in New Jersey, I wouldn’t be surprised of many New Jersey gun dealers have frequent multiple gun sales, and frequent trace requests.  That doesn’t mean that the multiple sales are ending on the black market, and I doubt you have any proof of this.

This law contravenes no one’s Constitutional rights. The US Supreme Court stated, in last year’s Heller ruling, that individuals have a Second Amendment right to possess handguns in homes for self-protection, but that said ruling “should not be taken to cast doubt on…laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms,” a clear endorsement of NJ’s ability to regulate handgun purchases.

It’s simplistic to argue that any condition or qualification on a commercial sale is constitutional.  If that is the case, what’s to prevent a state from creating a qualification that only people who have incomes above 80,000 a year and good credit ratings may purchase a firearm?  If you want to argue it’s constitutional, that’s one thing, but you’ll find nothing in Heller that states that rationing this right is among the types of “conditions and qualifications” the court is speaking to.  Someone that has two residences, and suddenly find themselves under a credible threat might feel different about not being able to buy more than one firearm a month.  Did Heller not speak for them?

Sorry Bryan, but we’re willing to have a coversation.  You’re just not willing to listen to what we have to say.  There was a time when you didn’t have to.  Very soon that’s going to change, when your buddy Corzine is sent packing.  You better get used to addressing us as fellow citizens with a reasonable point of view.  The times are a changin’.

New Ballistics App

Winchester has developed a new external ballistics web app.  You can find it here. First impression is that it’s written in Microsoft Silverlight, which is essentially Microsoft’s answer to Flash.  This means I needed to download a plug-in in order to see it.  Flash is the standard for this kind of thing.  Why did they choose Silverlight?

Once I got the plugin issue squared away, looks like this one only does ballsitics for Winchester cartridges, and is very simple.  Far from sophisticated enough to use for reloading or serious shooting, which Winchester also makes components for.  Basically it would appear to be a marketing gimmick, rather than something genuinely useful for serious shooters.  If you’re looking for something that does useful ballistics, I’d suggest Joe Huffman’s Modern Ballistics.  I’ve also had luck with the iPhone app Ballistic.

So What?

Fox News is reporting:

The gunman who killed three women in an aerobics class at a Pittsburgh-area gym bought accessories for his weapons from the same dealer that sold a gun to the Virginia Tech shooter.

George Sodini, 48, purchased the items from TGSCOM Inc. of Green Bay, Wis., before committing the Aug. 4 massacre that left three women dead and nine wounded. He then killed himself.

They are a leading supplier.  I’ve been a customer too.  One of my Glock 15 round magazines was purchased from them, during the height of the Assault Weapons Ban, I might add.  Cost me more back then, but the cost wasn’t prohibitive.  My Glock came with two 10 round Clinton magazines.  For carry, I decided to spring for the standard fifteen round mag.  The day after the ban expired, I went out and bought two more stamped “Restricted – For Military and Law Enforcement Use Only” just because I could.  But my point is that they are a leading supplier.  I’m sure there are many many gun owners who have done business with them.  I’d hate to have their name dragged through the mud, as if they are seeking out pscyhos and nutjobs to do business with.

Right on Cue With the Sotomayor Confirmation

The Brady’s are touting their latest victory over the big bad National Rifle Association because she was confirmed 68-31.  Even the Washington Post is saying not so fast.  NRA has been pushing pretty hard, and exploring the edge of the envelope.  Defeating a Presidents nominee is extraordinarily difficult, and this result should not be surprising.  But you will see many in the media attempt to play up NRA’s weakness here, and try to make the case for the gun control movement.

You had nine Republican Senators defect and vote for her.  The nine were Vionovich (OH), Graham (SC), Alexander (TN), Gregg (NH), Bond (MO), Snowe (ME), Collins (ME), Lugar (IN), and Martinez (FL).

Here’s the situation as I see it.  Previously we had a choice between lousy not lousy when it came to gun rights.  The Democrats were lousy, and the Republicans were just enough not lousy to keep us voting for them.  After suffering defeat after defeat, and at risk of becoming a regional party, the Democrats decided to run pro-gun candidates in conservative districts in order to rebuild their majority.  The gambit worked!  Now Republicans have to be very concerned that Democrats are threatning the loyalty of what has been a very significant voting bloc for them.  NRA has 4 million members, and some 13 million, I believe, who have been members and are sympathetic.  Additionally, I think I recall there being 33 million people who think they are members of the NRA.  That’s nothing to sneeze at in politics.

So what we have before us in an opportunity to whip the Republicans a bit, and let them show us that they can out pro-gun the Democrats.  I think the Thune amendment was part of that.  I also think the Sotomayor vote is too.  Nine defections certainly sucks, but 31 Republicans still voted against her confirmation.  That’s 31 Republicans who just showed us they can out pro-gun the Democrats.  Despite the loss, this puts us in a very good position.  A lot of those pro-gun Dems will know they need to work to make it up to us for their vote on Sotomayor.  Guys like Tester, Webb, Pryor, Begich, and the other pro-gun Dems know they are not going to win re-election or easily win re-election without NRA support.  In essence, we may be in a position now where the pro-gun elements of each party, which are a majority of both houses of Congress, try to out do the other.  It’s far from the reality the Brady’s are touting, and far from what you’ll see in media outlets.  I honestly don’t think NRA’s power has ever been stronger, and we’re very very lucky that’s the case.

Keep Digging Joe. Keep Digging.

Joe Sestak apparently doesn’t want to face the fact that Pennsylvania tends to like its Democrats pro-gun, except in the City if Philadelphia and the townships and boroughs that immediately ring the city limits.  Otherwise Joe Sestak wouldn’t be publically calling for an Assault Weapons Ban renewal:

“This recent incident recommits us to reinstitute the assault weapons ban originally instituted in 1994. I have continuously pushed for this ban to be reinstituted since I came to Congress in 2007, including just last year when I cosponsored The Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Act.

Part of me almost wants Sestak to win his primary, so we can finally be rid of Arlen.  I also think that Sestak is easier to beat in a statewide race.  But then again, we tried that strategy with Obama, and it didn’t turn out so well.  Either way, however, I think Sestak is making a mistake running on this issue in Pennsylvania.  Even Fast Eddie played down his anti-gun bona fides big time when he ran for Governor.  Sestak is digging his own political grave if he runs with this issue out on his sleeve.  It might win him some votes in Philadelphia, but it hurts him in most of the rest of the state.