Bad Signs for the 2015 NRA Convention in Nashville?

I was looking for the annual misogynistic media column this year (haven’t found it yet), and I came across a media story about the 2015 NRA annual meeting that is scheduled for Nashville.

The convention center has already booked future events with 150 groups, including some big names like the National Rifle Association, which will bring up to 40,000 people to Nashville in 2015.

Um. Nashville, please contact NRA organizers pronto. I doubt NRA has cited the “up to 40,000” number since there hasn’t been a convention that small since I started attending these things in 2004.

With the record setting crowds that have come to Louisville and St. Louis topping 60-70,000 people, it seems a little absurd that Nashville would see such a significant drop off being close to many of the same attendees as those other cities.

This is annoying because it seems to be said with a purpose of belittling our influence and interest as gun owners. The press can now report that Nashville is expecting NRA member interest to drop by more than 40% based on predicted convention numbers, and I haven’t seen any indication that’s the truth.

Things I’m Looking for at NRA Annual Meeting

Looking over the previous year’s posts, I’m always struck by the little things that stick out at the time of the NRA convention that otherwise get lost in the greater gun debate.

One of the common themes is that regardless of how much the media often tries to portray “the gun lobby” as some evil group of gun company fat cats, it’s not that at all. It’s people. It’s real gun owners like you and me. Even if NRA doesn’t always represent our exact views in every single issue debate in every legislature, it’s still an organization made up of pretty normal people who all have a voice and a role in the organization.

Randomly, here are a few things I’ll be looking for at this year’s annual meeting.

1) How many eligible voters received ballots this year versus last year. Eligible voters are those who have been members for 5 consecutive years or who are fully paid life members. Last year, 1,596,869 people met those standards. Given that the final date to join and receive a ballot was in January, this year could be very interesting. It will give us some clue as to how many people signed up for life during the early stages of the gun control push.

2) Whether foreign NRA members will be recognized during the quorum call at the member meeting. I know it’s random and rather minor, but it came up as a resolution last year by someone who actually joined while living in the UK and then eventually fled the country to live here where we actually respect his rights. However, it was a comment on the topic that was left by a reader that really struck me:

I’ve attended approximately fifteen NRA Annual Conventions over the past years including this year in Saint Louis. I was at the meeting when the resolution was presented and it made me feel, for the first time, that I was really a part of this great organization. I am a Benefactor Life Member living in Regina Saskatchewan, Canada and I am looking forward to Houston in 2013. A friend of mine from Regina was also in Saint Louis and he upgraded his membership from Patron to Benefactor while at the Convention. When we were in the NRA Store, we met an individual from Ontario, Canada who was working as an NRA Volunteer at the Convention.

That’s pretty awesome. Those are non-citizens helping do more for the community than some of our own folks here at home. I think that deserves a recognition in the quorum call.

3) Interesting non-gun products. Paul Erhardt laid out a pretty good explanation for why you aren’t seeing much development or new launches of guns at this year’s annual meeting.

Right now, because of the non-stop gun buying taking place most companies are focussed on meeting demand for existing products and have their shop floors running 24/7, leaving little room (make that no room) for production of a new product.

Sure, you’ll see some derivative products, like a new AR-style rifle or 1911, that don’t require changes in machinery or programming. A company making and selling the hell out of an AR can swiftly make changes to the gun’s features to create both a new product and, more importantly, a new price point…preferably one with a higher profit margin.

But the truly new products, the ones built from the ground up and not extensions of an existing product line, are likely to be absent from this year’s show.

Basically, we’re too busy buying everything they already make to warrant shifting resources to new launches. That makes sense. But, that doesn’t mean that there isn’t awesome stuff to see on the side aisles. That’s what I’ll be focusing on this year when I am on the floor.

4) Specifically in the non-gun category, innovative or decorative gun storage solutions. As I’ve noted on Pinterest several times, gun storage solutions are actually very popular pins on the heavily female social network. It’s not completely shocking since the initial users were heavily skewed toward the midwest, but it’s still amazing just how common such pins really are now that interest in the site is more diverse.

What other things did I miss? What little facts, debates, or products interest you this year?

Paranoia & Fear

I stumbled across a Facebook post gathering of Texas anti-gun activists who are concerned about the NRA annual meeting and exhibits taking place in Houston. As much as our opposition says that we’re the paranoid ones, their side has the woman speaking out who is convinced that the convention is full of people to fear who are “insane” and “nuts” simply for wanting to look at guns.

antigunfear

When challenged over why she would be fearful of law abiding NRA convention attendees, she spoke more of who she fears the most.

antigunfear2

I don’t know what’s worse here. On one hand there’s the paranoia that Sarah Palin or Ted Nugent is going to hurt her because she wants more gun control. On the other hand, there’s the overinflated sense of self-worth that comes with the assumption that Sarah Palin or Ted Nugent would even give enough of a damn about her existence to even want to hurt her.

The funny thing is that as much as she fears people on the right being around guns out of a sense that they’ll want to hurt others for not thinking like them, she’s the one who hopes that the FBI is keeping an eye on everyone who attends who might think differently than she does. So much for free thought or free association.

The Billionaire Who Made Gun Control His Pet Issue

I do consider Mike Bloomberg’s money a serious threat to our Second Amendment rights. When it comes down to it, he can pay people to stand up against us and pay for ads to take up every single commercial break in key media markets. Like it or not, money talks and influences.

However, I was recently reminded about that other billionaire white old man who figured that if he could just throw enough money at the issue and start a new group with an innocent sounding name, then he could get more gun control. Anyone remember Andrew McKelvey and Americans for Gun Safety?

Back in 2001, AGS shot onto the scene by suddenly spending more than $1.8 million on lobbying Congress for gun control. This came after some federal spending in 2000, as well as a big state push focused on Colorado. Regardless, their 2001 reports showed more than seven times the spending levels of the Brady Campaign, VPC, and CSGV combined in the same year. (Remember, this was back when those groups actually had some money to spend.) Beyond their own internal lobbying expenses, they also hired two additional lobbying firms.

The following year, they dropped their federal lobbying expenditures to just under $1.4 million, but they were still the big lobbying players in the game in total spending and by expanding to hire three lobby shops to assist them.

In 2003, their lobbying efforts had fallen to less than $700,000, but that number was still more than any other group could afford. They cut back to only one additional lobbying firm to help out. A year later, at the height of the debate over semi-auto gun bans, they cut their spending to just over $275,000 and let the Brady Campaign take the lead in the gun control movement again. However, they did retain a new outside firm to assist. By 2005, they were no longer spending any money in the federal lobbying game and eventually saw their foundation folded into Third Way.

I’m not saying that we can get cocky and ignore the threats by Mike Bloomberg toward our fundamental rights. What McKelvey was willing to spend in their biggest year is less than what Bloomberg spent on just one Congressional special election to hold a Chicago seat. Bloomberg will not go away quietly. However, I thought that it should be noted that real grassroots action can compete against the big bucks of billionaires who want to tell you how to live your life.

Sandy Hook Families Heading to Trenton

It looks like the anti-gun groups are flying in non-residents in order to campaign for Democrats in New Jersey.

Let me repeat that.

The anti-gun groups in New Jersey are resorting to flying in Newtown, CT families in order to participate in Democratic campaign meetings and to lobby for gun control. This is New Jersey, it’s amazing they have to fly in outsiders to promote Democrats and make the state more anti-gun.

Of course, local gun owners are also planning to visit the State House and remind lawmakers who they really represent. Let us hope that these lawmakers remember that these Connecticut residents don’t vote in New Jersey.

Gun Owners Continue Owning Guns & Won’t Help Gun Control Groups or Assist in Promoting Partisan Agenda

That absurdly long headline sums up the contents of this UPI article.

I kid you not, there’s an entire piece running documenting the complaint of a single “Democratic political consultant” who supports gun control about how gun rights groups aren’t helping her to pass her partisan agenda.

“We have to balance the right to bear arms with the right to be safe. A gun giveaway right now inflames emotions and does not help us achieve that goal.”

How is this considered news? Would it make headlines that I did not assist the Brady Campaign in their effort to ban guns that I shoot? Is it now a major news story that I am not offering my services to Mike Bloomberg’s MAIG coalition to keep people who have no criminal record from owning guns? I mean I don’t do these things every day. I didn’t realize that it was somehow newsworthy.

Long Term Consequences of Ammo Shortages in .22

Clayton Cramer blogged about the possible impact of a copper mine landslide on ammunition production, and that got me thinking about the extended impacts of today’s continued ammunition shortages.

Working with the Friends of NRA program, I’ve met several local instructors for youth shooting programs. Since most of these folks work with new junior shooters, they always start off with .22. I know at least one local Boy Scout camp shooting instructor who seriously questioned their ability to have any kind of shooting program due to the lack of ammunition. This is a long-term problem, folks. Every opportunity we lose to introduce new shooters to safe firearms handling is an opportunity to lost creating another pro-gun voter in the future. At the very least, it’s the loss of someone who likely won’t become hysterical gun policy debates because they at least have some basic understanding of firearms.

I’ve actually thought about getting back into shooting at Sebastian’s club more this year since I largely haven’t shot anything in a good year or more. But then that goes to the issue of not wanting to use up what ammunition we have knowing that we can’t easily get more of it.

A local gun shop is showing their new shipment of 50,000 rounds 5.56 which is already on sale (normally, they wait and put all ammo on sale on Saturday mornings) and even available for up to 10 boxes purchased at a time. Meanwhile, the few boxes of .22 are limited to one box per customer. I’m not sure I’ll ever get over the shock of .22 being the high demand caliber of ammunition.

I am thinking about pestering Sebastian to fix my Crosman this year so I can shoot air gun again. A quick search of places that sell pellets actually show specials to get a free tin (or multiple free tins!) of pellets with a purchase. That’s a very refreshing change to see. (For what it’s worth, any air gun billed as “tactical” makes me laugh.)

The Problem of Pennsylvania

This is why the gun control debate isn’t going away in Pennsylvania.

It’s kind of funny that we’re not currently facing any serious threats at the state level, yet Pennsylvania seems to be right on an edge of voting for major gun control supporters.

It doesn’t make me feel any better that some are speculating a MAIG mayor who raised tons of cash for a re-election effort that was abruptly cancelled may turn that into a super PAC fund.