Single Issue Voter?

Reader KathyH brought up something in the comments about single issue voting, which got me interested.   Just out of curiosity, how many of you folks are single issue voters?

I am not, generally, believe it or not.  I’ve never voted for someone outright hostile to gun-rights, but I have voted for politicians who were less than staunch allies because I agreed with them on other things.  Despite the fact that I think our senior senator, Arlen Specter, is batty and often annoying, I’ve consistently voted for him, because on a lot of other issues, I agree with him on.

I also voted against Rick Santorum, despite is strong support of gun rights, because while I’m willing to accept some token social conservatism, he took the issue to new and insane heights, and I thought he deserved to get kneecapped because of it.

My major issues tend to change from election cycle to election cycle, but 2008 presidential it’s shaping to be:

  • Foreign Policy
  • Supreme Court
  • Smaller government
  • Firearms Policy

I actually suspect 2008 won’t feature much gun control, so I think that issue could end up being off the table.  It will come down to the other three.  I can’t rank in any order, because it depends greatly on how much the candidate offends or supports each view.  My support for Richardson over other Democrats reflects my desire to see gun control completely off the agenda, but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t vote for Guiliani over Richardson, if Richardson proposed something like, pulling our of Iraq and leaving the field to Iran and Al-Qaeda.

I’m also very concerned with seeing judges appointed to the Supreme Court who follow what the law says, rather than what they wish it to be.  I tend to agree more with Republicans on this issue than Democrats.  Though I support keeping abortion legal, I don’t favor how the Supreme Court chose to go about doing it.  So I don’t get quite that worked up as your averge Democrat when someone says they think Roe was wrongly decided.

Gun control ranks high in my political calculus, but it’s not overwhelmingly dominant.  This means I will probably never vote for a candidate who is explicitly running on a campaign of gun control, but other things can offend me as well.

Putting the “C” in Crazy

While the Pennsylvania media is busy writing about how insane Pennsylvania gun owners are, I decided to look up the person who was apparently responsible for the banner which gave the people allied against us all the ammo they need:

Alan Kiser

Warning, the web page will annoy you with cheesy music. I happen to believe that people who assault my ears with cheesy music because I loaded their page should most definitely be hung from the tree of liberty. Leave it to a third party dude to bring the crazy to the party eh?

Constitution Party of Pennsylvania

Ahhh! More crappy music! I love the use of vibrato on some sections that just kind of bashes you over the head. I think it might have stolen my wallet too.

Now I’m not bashing third parties here folks. They serve a very valuable purpose in making the two main political parties, who are about as worthless as the dirt on the bottom of my shoe, seem sane and reasonable. The sad part is that I support a lot of constitutionalist views. I just can’t abide by the freaky religious stuff and rhetoric that underlies much of what the CP does.

Glad I Didn’t Go!

This is one for the “How Not to Win Column”:

HARRISBURG — A sign waved at a gun supporters’ rally Tuesday outraged lawmakers who interpreted it as suggesting the lynching of a Philadelphia legislator and said they would report the incident to police as a death threat.

Two men stunned onlookers by raising the banner criticizing Democratic Rep. Angel Cruz, sponsor of a bill that would create a registry of gun owners and require people to pay a yearly $10 fee for each gun or face state police confiscation of their weapons. Cruz should be “hung from the tree of liberty for treasonous acts against the Constitution,” the sign read.

Are you friggin kidding me?  Look, I’m against the gun registration as much as anyone, and I’d like nothing more than to see Cruz pay a political price for it.  But let’s get real here.  The proper remedy for a politician going against their political oath is to throw them out of office, not to suggest they ought to be hanged.  This just makes us look insane.

The sign was “over the top,” Cruz said, but he said attendees had a right to express their opinions. He said people outside of Philadelphia don’t understand what it’s like in a city where “five or six killings” happen a day.

In the rest of Pennsylvania, “they don’t hunt human beings like they do in Philadelphia,” said Cruz, whose bill is before the House Judiciary Committee.

Imagine that.  Lots of guns, and we don’t kill each other.   Maybe Philadelphia has a criminal problem rather than a gun problem?

Republican Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, of Cranberry, a strong supporter of gun owners’ rights who helped organize the rally, said the sign contained “horrible statements” that had no place in a conversation about politics and policy. The people involved did not represent the event organizers, he said.

Geez guys, you even pissed off Daryl Metcalfe!   He’s one of the staunchest supporters of gun rights in the legislature.

“The overwhelming majority of gun owners are not criminals. …They are not madmen, and they shouldn’t be treated as such. They’re hunters and sportsmen,” said Rep. Jesse White, a Democrat who represents portions of Washington, Beaver and Allegheny counties.

He’s right.  It’s a pity a few bozos had to suggest otherwise.

No Thanks

Mike S. Adams of Townhall has an idea on how to prevent future tragedies:

Because there are two ways to buy a handgun in North Carolina (with a CCW or with a one-time pistol purchase permit) there are two types of people who are able to buy guns; 1) Those with a CCW who have been subjected to criminal background checks, have released full medical and psychiatric records, and have taken a firearms safety course. 2) Those who obtained a purchase permit by submitting to a criminal background check, without releasing medical and psychiatric records, and without taking a firearms safety course.

At this point in the column I’m ready to unleash the first three steps in my four-step proposal for preventing mass killings on college campuses. The first two steps will not surprise my readers but the third will:

All states should allow citizens to apply for a CCW. All states should allow those with a CCW to buy guns without a separate pistol purchase permit.
All states should eliminate pistol purchase permits immediately.

So you’re suggesting that we license gun owners, essentially.  How is that different from what the gun controllers are suggesting?  You don’t license a right.

Hat Tip to War On Guns

Fred Thompson? Why Not

I’ve heard Fred Thompson say enough good things lately to really start hoping he runs. I am currently registered as a Libertarian, which means I don’t vote in primaries in Pennsylvania, but I would gladly switch my registration to either of the two parties if they can front someone I’d be willing to vote for.

I was thinking I might actually register Democrat so I could vote for Bill Richardson, but if Fred decides to throw his hat into the ring, I’ll register Republican and vote for him. Given that my other choice are the three stooges on the Republican ticket, Thompson seems like he might be a breath of fresh air.

It’s still early yet, and there’s plenty of time to disappoint, but given that Obama might actually beat Hillary, I might find myself hard pressed to find a Republican I won’t vote for given that choice.

UPDATE: Be sure to check out Frank J’s Daily Fred Thompson Fact

PA Gun Registration – House Bill 760

I have gotten an update on the status of the Pennsylvania Gun Registration bill from Representative Sam Rohrer. Here’s the relevant excerpt:

The provisions of House Bill 760 are, in my opinion, unconstitutional, impractical and simply outrageous. Without question, a requirement to register all firearms with the State Police, to submit to fingerprinting, to provide full home address and social security number or be guilty of a summary offense as House Bill 760 would require, is an example of the clear violation of the citizen’s right to keep and bear arms. For any member to sponsor, cosponsor or support legislation that clearly infringes upon constitutionally identified and guaranteed rights raises a serious question as to whether this action violates the oath that Members took to defend and protect the citizen’s rights as guaranteed in the Constitutions of the United States and of Pennsylvania.

House Bill 760 would not only impose a violation of our constitutional rights through invasive government requirements, it would also tax our right to own firearms through a $10.00 tax to be levied every year on each firearm.

On Wednesday, April 18, 2007, Representative Caltagirone, who is the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, was quoted in the Pittsburgh Tribune Review. In reference to the House Bill 760 moving out of Judiciary Committee, Representative Caltagirone said, “It’s not going anywhere.” His decision has much to do with the responses from each and every one of you.

Good work on both the part of Representative Rohrer and Pennsylvania gun owners. But he goes on to remind us that we have to remain vigalilent. It’s been my opinion that HB 760 was never meant to get anywhere, but serves as political cover for one-gun-a-month. By giving gun rights advocates something to focus their energies on, that had no chance of passing, it would wear us out in the fight to make sure gun rationing never becomes law in the commonwealth.

I think he’s right this bill isn’t going anywhere, but beware of gun rationing. That issue won’t go away.

Gun Rights Conference Today in Harrisburg

The Allegheny County Sportsman’s League (sort of like PA’s version of VCDL) is holding a Gun Rights Conference today in Harrisburg:

We all knew the challenges we would face after last year’s election and our darkest fears are being realized. The only way to defeat this is to join together once again and show those who would take our freedoms that we will not yield.

We will join together for an early preemptive strike on our issues by having a lobbying and education day, focusing on freshmen legislators, and connect that with launching our pro-gun agenda, as we did last year. Members of the Pennsylvania grassroots and gun owner’s coalition, which has been so successful for us on other issues, met with Representative Daryl Metcalfe in early December to devise a strategy for the upcoming session so that we would be prepared to deal with these issues. The date we have agreed upon is April 24th and we will combine our meeting and lobbying with another Pro-Gun Press conference to introduce our pro-gun/pro-sportsmen agenda of legislation. We can also use this opportunity to excoriate the anti-gun forces, legislators and issues.

I went to the last rally at Harrisburg last September, where the house defeated, pretty overwhelmingly, the gun control wishlist of the Philadelphia politicians in the Committee of the Whole.  I feel bad that I can’t get to this one to cover it, especially given that I have a freshman state representative, but I could end up short on vacation this year.  Maybe next time.

NICS Improvements

According to SayUncle, Charles Schumer and Carolyn McCarthy have re-introduced the NICS Improvement bill. To be honest, I don’t really oppose the idea of improving NICS records, provided:

  1. There are due process protections for adjudicating someone a mental defective. This means there needs to have been a hearing, and the defendant able to make a defense and face his accusers. This might actually require modifying the language of GCA 68 to make what “adjudicated mental defective” means exactly.
  2. That NICS receive no other information other than the person is prohibited from possession of firearms.
  3. There is an administrative remedy to challenge the system and get your name out of NICS.
  4. The bill include a repeal of the Hughes Amendment.

Do those things, and I’ll be happy to not oppose this bill. Use this as a covert means to disarm people without due process, and I’m fighting it. The Hughes Amendment thing is really just a goodwill gesture, you know. Considering who’s pushing this bill, I expect something in there to show you’re not just out trying to screw lawful gun owners.

US Gun Laws 101

I know most of my readers already know this stuff, but I’ve been getting a lot of google traffic relating to the subject, so I thought it might be good to get something like this out there. If I got any of this wrong, feel free to correct me.

After the Virginia Tech tragedy, I’m hearing a lot of stuff in the media, particularly foreign media, that are misrepresenting the actual state of US gun control laws. First thing that ought to be understood is that gun control is mostly a state power. The federal government regulates commerce in guns for the most part, with the states regulating everything else. Most states have fairly liberal gun laws, but a few do require licensing, a few ban certain scary looking semi-automatic firearms known as “assault weapons”, a few ban machine guns, even though the feds regulate that too. But laws from state to state don’t differ all that much. Here’s how it basically works

Felons in Possession

In all 50 states it’s illegal for people convicted of a felony, and certain disqualifying misdemeanors, from purchasing, possessing, or even touching a firearm, ammunition or components. It’s illegal for someone who has been adjudicated mentally defective or committed involuntarily to a mental institution from purchase and possession of firearms. It is also illegal for anyone to knowingly transfer a firearm to someone who is prohibited from possessing them.

Point of Sale

At the point of sale, all firearms buyers have to fill out a form, called ATF 4473, present government issued identification to the dealer, and submit to a background check. Form 4473 is basically an affidavit, where you declare who you are, where you live, that you are a US citizen or resident alien, that you have not been convicted of any disqualifying offense, are not a fugitive from justice, that you’ve never renounced your citizenship, etc. Lying on this form is a felony. After that, the dealer will complete a background check to ensure that you have never been convicted of any disqualifying offenses. The background check is computerized and takes only a few minutes. Sometimes purchasers will be put into review, in which case it can take longer, up to a few days. The sale may not proceed until the background check has completed. Some states require their own forms to be filled out as well. Pennsylvania requires one for purchasing handguns, but not long guns. Many states have their own background check systems, and there is a federal system as well called NICS (National Instant Check System). Once you check out, the purchase proceeds like any other. If you are denied, the purchase may not complete, and if you are a prohibited person, the police may come arrest you, because it’s illegal for a prohibited person to even attempt to purchase a gun.

National Firearms Act

Firearms other than those which are ordinary rifles, shotguns and pistols are regulated under the National Firearms Act. These include short barreled rifles (rifles less than 26 inches overall and with barrels less than 16 inches), short barreled shotguns (shotguns less than 28 inches overall, and barrels less than 18 inches), destructive devices (cannons, grenades, rocket launchers, etc), machineguns (firearms that fire more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger), silencers and suppressors, and Any Other Weapons (AOWs, anything that’s not any of the other items. These are things like umbrella guns, cane guns, pen guns, cell phone guns).

NFA firearms are highly restricted and you can’t just go into a gun shop and buy one. The regulations vary depending on the type of NFA firearm you’re looking to be in possession of. Needless to say, machineguns and destructive devices are the most heavily restricted. They require an extensive FBI background check, fingerprinting, registration, payment of a 200 dollar transfer tax, sign off from your local police chief, all to be submitted to the ATF on Form 4. If everything checks out, in a few months you will be issued a stamp, much like the one that caused the colonists to revolt against the crown, that proves you are in legal possession. You have to inform ATF in order to move the firearm between states or to another residence. Other NFA firearms still require payment of a tax, and require the completion of a form, but aren’t quite as difficult to obtain. In 1986, Congress decided to disallow new registrations for machineguns. All machineguns that are transferable to civilians must have been registered prior to 1986. Anything not registered is illegal to possess except for military and law enforcement. It is illegal to possess any parts from which you could make an NFA weapon, or manufacture one without a license.

Carrying of Firearms

Most states allow for the open carrying of firearms for purposes of sport, recreation or self-protection. Some states require a license to carry a firearm openly. Open carrying of a firearm is not common in populated areas, except in some parts of the southwest. Most states require a license to carry a firearm concealed on or about one’s person, or in a vehicle. Two states require no such license, Alaska and Vermont. Two states outright prohibit the carrying of concealed weapons, Wisconsin and Illinois. Several states, like New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, California, and Hawaii severely restrict the issuance of licenses to carry a concealed weapon (unless you happen to have good political connections, then you can get one). In most states, you can apply for a license to carry a concealed weapon, and if you meet certain objective criteria, which typically involves firearms and legal training, submitting to a background check and being free of a criminal record, supplying references, fingerprints, etc. Once law enforcement processes your application and clears you, you are issued a license. Most states recognize out of state licenses, but there’s considerable variation in this. I have been issued licenses by four states, Pennsylvania, Florida, New Hampshire and Washington, which, between the four of them, allow me to carry a concealed firearm in about 33 states. Typically in states where concealed weapons licenses are issued, about 1-2% of the population obtains such a license. Pennsylvania issues about 600,000-700,000 licenses, which is about 6% of the population. Some people carry regularly, most don’t. Virginia issues about 250,000 licenses in their state, but Virginia Tech prohibits firearms on their campus. Typically schools are off limits to license holders, in addition to federal buildings, national parks, establishments that serve alcohol, court houses, and a few other places. Where you can’t carry varies from state to state. Most states prohibit carrying a weapon while intoxicated.

Firearm Bans

Only one jurisdiction effectively bans firearms, and that’s Washington D.c. Chicago bans handguns, New York City heavily restricts them, so they are banned for people without money and political connections. California, Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey ban semi-automatic versions of certain military rifles.

Constitutional Issues

In addition to the federal constitution, most states have some right to keep and bear arms provisions in their state constitutions. The states that lack them are the ones that most severely restrict firearms ownership. The Supreme Court of the United States has only ever heard one second amendment case, and failed to make a definitive ruling in that case as to what the second amendment did or did not protect. Thus, the second amendment has not been incorporated under the fourteenth amendment and been made to apply to the states. So the states without right to bear arms provisions in their state constitution have restricted firearms to some degree. Washington DC’s ban is currently being challenged in federal court. It’s unclear whether the Supreme Court will take the case. So far the DC circuit court has nullified the DC gun ban as unconstitutional, but the final say on that issue has not been had.

So there it is in a nutshell. Media machinations about being able to buy machines guns over the counter at Wal-Mart are grossly exaggerated. Yes, US guns laws are remarkably liberal compared to other countries around the world, but it’s not a free for all. They are still a regulated product.