Is FactCheck.org really nonpartisan? Because here’s what they say about NRA’s attacks on Barack Obama:
Much of what the NRA passes off as Obama’s “10 Point Plan to ‘Change’ the Second Amendment” is actually contrary to what he has said throughout his campaign: that he “respects the constitutional rights of Americans to bear arms” and “will protect the rights of hunters and other law-abiding Americans to purchase, own, transport, and use guns.”
The NRA, however, simply dismisses Obama’s stated position as “rhetoric” and substitutes its own interpretation of his record as a secret “plan.” Said an NRA spokesman: “We believe our facts.”
Except if you look at Obama’s record on guns, he’s proposed all these things! If you’re going to call yourself “Fact Check” the first thing you should do is check your facts, and if you do that, you’ll see that Barack Obama’s record on The Second Amendment is absolutely atrocious. They actually expect gun owners to believe what he’s saying now to get elected, and pass that off as “Facts”
Non-partisan my ass, they are shills out to get Obama elected.












