A long time New Jersey Assemblyman, who was one of the co-sponsors of the Florio assault weapons ban back in the 90s, apparently loves the Children a bit too much.
Shamelessly pilfered from Cemetery.
Bart Stupak Earning High Brady Praise
The Brady’s have to go digging over a decade ago to find reasons to praise Bart Stupak. I’m not sure why the Brady folks are airing out Stupak’s dirty laundry now that he’s announced he’s retiring, but I have my suspicions.
The history of Congressman Stupak for the last decade, at least on the Second Amendment, is one of working his way back to an A, and an NRA endorsement last election, from a C back in the days the Brady Campaign is speaking of. A Tiger can’t change his stripes, but politicians sure can, and often do. It’s worth noting that, despite what Congressman Stupak’s prior position was, he’s not listed as a co-sponsor on the current “gun show loophole” bill in Congress.
Perhaps the Brady Campaign believe that Stupak’s position on the gun show bill is a careful political calculation, and are hoping to influence him on his way to retirement to “do the right thing,” and join them in helping get a bill passed, or at least advanced. I think the odds of Congress wanting to pick up a major piece of gun control legislation before the 2010 midterms are low, but retiring legislators are more amenable to changing their positions than most, so it was probably worth floating a press release just to see if anyone in Stupak’s office bites.
NRA Needs to Hire Competent Web Developers
It looks like NRA has redone their web site yet again, and it is also another Flash monstrosity. If I were giving lessons on the problems Adobe Flash creates for web developers, NRA’s web portal would be my Exhibit A. Let me just review the ways this screws NRA and its membership:
- It does not get NRA message out there. It’s a giant black hole to Google. One reason NRA-ILA and Blogs rank so highly on gun searches is that we’re not a black hole to Google, because we only use Adobe Flash sparingly.
- It’s slow to load. It takes several seconds to load even on my 35 megabit/sec FiOS connection. To someone with a slower DSL connection, or, God Forbid, a dial-up or Satellite connections (something still prevalent in rural areas) it’s going to be excruciating.
- It imposes a size on the user. In my preferred browser size, I cannot see the entire page. I have to scroll, or re-size my browser in order to see the whole monstrosity. A good page design won’t impose unreasonable size requirements on a user. The total page size is gigantic. It imposes itself over most of my 1440×900 laptop screen.
- Breaks web usability standards. Browser navigation buttons fail to work, but most importantly, disabled users can’t increase the font size so they can read, nor could a blind user have the web site read aloud to them.
- Breaks analytic software. Flash breaks the ability of knowing which pages people are coming and going on. Now it’s possible this is built into the flash application, but I don’t notice anything on the front web site that loads analytics software. NRA probably has no idea, and can have no idea, how people are using their site with Flash. If you’re a webmaster, that’s a critical bit of information.
- Not linkable. I can’t link to anything that’s not a URL, and a Flash page is not a URL, but a bit of code that’s embedded into a Flash application.
- Breaks Mobile Devices. It looks like NRA’s web folks have redirects in there for the iPhone and iPod Touch, but that doesn’t help the millions of users who use alternative devices like the Droid and Blackberry. Even when these devices are Flash enabled, the site is not friendly to the small screens.
This “classic” page is a much much better home page for NRA, and would work much better as NRA’s main portal. But even this could still use some work. NRA would be wise to trash the flash monstrosity and make the “classic” page the default. At the very least, it should at least remember that a user picked the “classic” site and load that upon subsequent visits. Good web design and programming are easier than good Flash programming, so if NRA has the internal ability to do one they ought to be able to do the other. It’s just a matter of adhering to good practices.
The Daily Show on Open Carry
The Daily Show did a piece on the open carry movement last night. I have to admit I think their coverage is pretty funny, but I’m not sure, overall, it’s good for the right to bear arms.
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Open Carrier Discrimination | ||||
|
||||
What made the Open Carry guys think talking to the Daily Show was a good idea? That show lampoons everyone. That they were going to be the butt of a joke was entirely predictable. I think we ought to be able to laugh at ourselves, but do we want the rest of America laughing at us too?
UPDATE: John Pierce, the subject of the Daily Show interview, responds in the comments as to what motivated them to do TDS interview. Of all the points the first one is probably the most compelling, that if they hadn’t done the interview, someone else would have. I should clarify I don’t think TDS interview is in any way a disaster, since I think it’s funny, and doesn’t stoop to the kind of fear mongering you’d get from our opponents. But I have to wonder if we really want our issue’s first introduction to a younger, more urban generation to be a lampooning by the Daily Show.
Video of Arizona Wal-Mart ND
A few days ago I linked to a story of an Arizona man who is facing charges after his pistol discharged in a Wal-Mart. Now we have the video where you can see this guy walking around the store, gun in hand, and drawing the firearm, dropping the magazine, and putting it back. The video also shows some other highly odd behavior.
I’m going to go out on the limb here and suggest this guy either has some mental or developmental problems. It would seem he was wearing a Department of Corrections uniform shirt, and attended training with them for a brief period of time.
This guy is facing six counts of endangerment, which is a felony in Arizona if it involves a “substantial risk of imminent death.”  I would say this case pretty clearly fits that bill, so this guy is going to be a prohibited person if he’s convicted on just one of the counts, unless the prosecutor wants to plead him down to a misdemeanor. I don’t think that should be the case, considering we have video of his gratuitous gun handling. The evidence would appear to be strong enough there should be no need for a plea deal.
Liking the Chrome
A few weeks ago I decided to try out Google’s release of Chrome for MacOS. The Mac version is only in beta, but I have to say, I’m a fan. It’s faster than Safari and Firefox by far, and I’ve found it to be incredibly stable. Even though it’s a beta, it has yet to crash on me a single time, and it seems to handle keeping a large number of web pages open for a long time with no problem.
It’s crash recovery, however, is not quite as seamless as either Firefox or Safari, so that’s one area that could be worked on. I also tend to prefer to work in individual windows rather than tabs, so that’s one other area I would like to see more user flexibility on. But overall, I think Chrome is a great browser, and I haven’t found myself switching back yet to Safari or Firefox.
Indiana Gun Bills Under Attack
I think there are plenty of good libertarian arguments for why the “Parking Lot” bills pushed by the National Rifle Association elevate one freedom over the expense of others, but I’m not sure these arguments here are among them. The author also seems to make a bizarre case against the Katrina language in the bill:
The National Rifle Association claims that the new law will ” … prevent state or local government authorities from confiscating lawfully owned firearms during declared states of emergency, such as occurred in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina.”
Really? By what authority did government ever confiscate guns? Do new laws protect constitutions? From who?
They had no lawful authority, but don’t you think it makes sense to have a legal recourse available for addressing such illegal action that doesn’t involve expensive and lengthy federal civil rights lawsuits? It’s a nice idea that the constitution is self-enforcing, but sorry, I don’t want to live in a world where all I have is a promise from public officials.
Read our state and federal constitutions and you’ll find that not even courts were given any power over constitutions. Both are clear and regarding an individual’s right to bear arms.
Ah, now we’re told to read the constitution, which the author has read and clearly understood, unlike the rest of us rubes. One wonders what he thinks “judicial Power of the United States” over “all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States,” means if Marbury v. Madison was wrong? I’m completely open to libertarian arguments against the “parking lot” language in the bill, but simplistic arguments that the constitution is somehow self-enforcing is weak, at best.
Andrew Horning, an adjunct scholar of the Indiana Policy Review Foundation, was the Libertarian candidate for governor in 2008.
I guess I should have skipped ahead to the end. This explains everything.
.22LR Kalashnikov
Lovers of Kalashnikovs can now join their AR-15 brethren in plinking all day for very little money with .22LR. Not to mention how much easier it will be on the shoulder too.
Going Backwards
Canada is considering getting rid of its long gun registry because it turned out to be a costly fiasco. That’s not stopping California, who is broke already, from thinking that trying the same thing would be swell.
John Cleese on Extremism
This John Cleese skit predates the Internet, but it’s highly appropriate:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4[/youtube]
I think anyone who’s been involved in political endeavors, especially in the Internet Age can relate.