The State of Missouri apparently has no evidence of the alert it sent out warning of a resuming militia movement.
Category: Politics
Funny Because It’s True
Wikipedia Joke?
Found while researching trends in Pennsylvania Governors last night, under the entry for Governor Martin Grove Brumbaugh, 25th Governor of Pennsylvania from 1915 to 1919:
His son, Dr. David Brumbaugh died in a barnstorming accident over Lake Michigan in 1921 when he choked on a sausage.
I had to do a double take on that one. There are barns to storm over Lake Michigan? And I’m not sure I want to know what role the sausage played in this daredevil stunt, or how he ended up choking on it. But I was unable to find any credible independent verification out there on how M.G. Brumbaugh’s son may have actually met his demise. So I’m thinking maybe someone on Wikipedia has a twisted sense of humor.
We Love Ya Sam, But No Dice
pa2010.com is reporting that Sam Rohrer is going to throw his hat into the GOP primary for Governor. I am a big fan of Rep. Rohrer. He is the sponsor of the Pennsylvania Firearms Freedom Act, and stands up for the 10th Amendment. I can’t help but admire a state rep willing to give the proverbial middle finger toward Washington, even if it’s a relatively symbolic one.
But as much as I might want to see him make the big leap someday, trying it from State Representative is a bit too ambitious, historically, for I have to go back to 1858 before I can find someone who went from State Representative to Governor, and he was a Speaker of the House at that.
So I want to encourage Rep. Rohrer to think about a better position from which to make the great leap:
- State Senator
- US Congressman
- Federal Appointed High Office
- Civil War General
We regret that the last option is likely closed to Representative Rohrer, but Pennsylvania elected no less than three consecutive Civil War Generals to that high office, one of which later went on to become a territorial Governor of Kansas, and then the first Mayor of San Francisco. Talk about an eclectic political career.
Of course, if Civil War general is a great ticket to the Governor’s Mansion, it makes me question how serious Rohrer is about State Sovereignty and the Tenth Amendment. You know, Sam, we could always have another go at it. How would you look in epaulets?
I suppose State Senate, or even Congress, is probably an easier path to executive state office, but if you want to think about raising up a Grand Army of the Susquehanna, and storming down to the Potomac, give me a call. We’ll do lunch. Congress is an overrated stepping stone anyway.
Cooking the Jobs Numbers?
Jim Geraghty noticed that New Jersey’s job numbers are looking surprisingly rosy now that Corzine re-election campaign is really heating up.
Attacks from the West
When I was updating the Bloomberg Pennsylvania anti-gun mayors map to reflect the challenges to preemption, I was again amazed at the geographical breakdown of the cases.
View Bloomberg’s Anti-Gun Mayors in Pennsylvania in a larger map
Notice that these attacks are not coming from Philadelphia and its suburbs – the area most gun owners believe to be the hot bed for gun control in Pennsylvania. Of the 10 cities that have passed a lost-and-stolen ordinance in violation of state preemption laws, 4 of the 5 in Western PA are in Allegheny County. If West Mifflin enacts their proposal tonight, that will make 5 of 6 (out of 11 total cities).
But sticking to the 10 that have actually passed as of this afternoon, 6 of those are west of the Philadelphia metro area. In fact, 3 of the 4 I am willing to consider in the Philadelphia metro area are not at all considered suburbs of the city. They aren’t even in the same media market, but I opted to be extremely generous in defining Mayor Nutter’s reach with this one.
I’m sure that some will point to the fact that I haven’t mapped York and Scranton, but I have good reasons for those two exceptions. In the case of York, they didn’t actually pass an ordinance. They knew it would be illegal and just passed a resolution. In Scranton’s case, the matter has been tabled.
So for those of us in the Philadelphia area, we’re the ones who need to take cover from the gun control assault being launched by the rest of the state. Isn’t that interesting, if not a little unexpected?
Too Fat to Be Governor?
Dave Kopel covers the latest in the New Jersey Governor’s race, and it may end up swinging on weight, namely Chris Christie’s portly proportions. I originally had a fair amount of optimism that Chris Christie’s campaign was going to pull it off, but the hope is rapidly dwindling as Corzine has narrowed and evened up the race. Corzine is outspending Christie three to one, and I just don’t see how that’s not going to help Corzine’s already surging numbers.
I’m not writing the Christie Campaign’s obituary yet, because when the race is close, it becomes a turnout game, and if Christie’s campaign has a strong turnout machine, they can win. But it’s very disappointing that New Jersey voters are shallow enough to give a governor they despise a second term, just because the other guy is fat.
Bloomberg Mayors Continue to Break State Laws
West Mifflin, Pennsylvania’s mayor is the latest to try and break state law by supporting municipal gun controls. Supported by his membership in Michael Bloomberg’s anti-gun group, the Borough Council will take up a proposal tonight to mandate that gun owners report their lost or stolen guns within an arbitrary time period, putting the burden of proof on the accused rather than the state. These ordinances are currently being challenged by the NRA in courts across the state.
Recently, Homestead Borough did the same thing, becoming the 10th city in Pennsylvania to violate the state preemption laws and the state Supreme Court’s Ortiz v. Commonwealth decision. Last night, Clairton became the 11th, though the first non-MAIG-mayor-lead city to do so. However, the proposal was pushed by extremely anti-gun Rep. David Levdansky who has recently taken up the charge of CeaseFirePA.
View Bloomberg’s Anti-Gun Mayors in Pennsylvania in a larger map
I’ve updated the map to reflect the mayors who are pushing Bloomberg’s agenda in violation of state law and the Supreme Court’s decision. At this point, it’s not enough to just track members and former members of the group. Bloomberg is hiring out from the Brady Campaign to try and undermine our state legislature and state courts.
God Help Me, I Can Relate to Barney Frank
He was interviewed on NPR about the gay rights march that happened this Sunday:
I think too many people, frankly, who share my view that this is going to be a waste of time, are afraid to say so because they will be considered insufficiently devoted to the cause. Rather than chanting broad slogans about equality when most members of Congress won’t even be in D.C., time and energy would be better spent on old-fashioned lobbying for specific legislation. The most successful, militant, political organization in America is the National Rifle Association. And they’ve never had a march, they’ve never had a shoot-in. They don’t do anything other than lobby members. They write, and they call, and they talk to members.
Emphasis mine. There’s a tendency to any movement to want to oust heretics, and people that question the faith. But I can relate to Frank’s irreverence, and his assertion of all that comes along with it.
Creigh Deeds was Better as a Moderate
After Jim Geraghty wrote about the Deeds campaign doubling down on the negative campaign – and being called out in the media for it – I really started to think about why Deeds seems to be flailing so much more now than he was in 2005. Sure, there are national trends to consider, but I’m not sure that’s it. The more I think about how I would be voting if I still lived in Virginia, the less convinced I am that it is playing a huge role.
Full disclosure, I voted for Creigh Deeds in 2005. So did most other voters since he only lost by about 325 votes in a statewide election with nearly 2 million voters. At that time, he not only had the NRA endorsement, but I knew he was willing to step up as a Democratic leader for sportsmen. He was running on his own record, one that a non-affiliated, Republican-leaning, little-l libertarian, could generally get behind. I realized that we may not agree on everything, but for the issues I cared about, he was slightly better than McDonnell at the time.
By the time the 2009 primary rolled around and he had run a little left. He didn’t run far left, mind you, but a little left. Deeds threw gun controllers a bone while McDonnell had strengthened his record – a feat hard to do in the position of Attorney General where you generally shy away from policy. Deeds can’t keep it straight when it comes to tax policy.
Needless to say, this kind of stuff turns independent/crossing-the-aisle voters off. On a few issues, he has gone just far enough to the left without going far, far left to make Bob McDonnell the preferred candidate. And now, rather than being within a polling range of ~325 votes, he’s falling far behind McDonnell for Round 2 of their match-up.
The NYT believes if Democratic voters would have chosen a more liberal Terry McAuliffethat he would stand a better shot against McDonnell. I would venture to say that if Creigh Deeds stayed true to himself, history shows that he might be better off for a more competitive race. Sure, there are other factors to consider like a general backlash against Democrats, but some of those factors were in play in 2005 against McDonnell. There’s also a money game. But I do have to consider that there are people like my mom and grandmother who were willing to back Deeds in the primary, hoping for the candidate of 2005 once the primary was over, but who are now voting McDonnell because of the slight swerve to the left by Deeds and all of the negative commercials.