Injunction Granted

A judge has blocked the City of Philadelphia from enforcing its gun control ordinances:

Common Pleas Judge Jane Cutler Greenspan is granting the National Rifle Association’s request Thursday to keep the ordinances from taking effect right away. The NRA argues that Pennsylvania law prevents municipalities from regulating guns.

So, the question is, how far do you want to push this Mayor Nutter and Commissioner Ramsey?  Do we want to risk contempt of court charges in addition to civil rights violations?  Still want to enforce your laws?

Defeat for Gun Control in IL

The RKBA movement is becoming extremely effective at keeping Daley and Blagowhatshisname’s agenda at bay.  Maybe they’ll soon be able to start reversing losses, and we can hit them with a combined strategy of litigation post-Heller, and grass roots action.  Armed and Safe told us yesterday that Daley would make his move on the anniversary of Virginia Tech (this date is a refuge of scoundrels everywhere it seems).  Well, it would appear Daley has gone down in flames.

Illinois is a good example of how effective we can be when NRA and its state affilate work together and are effective together.  It’s a pity Pennsylvania’s state Rifle and Pistol Assocation are mostly useless politically.

More on Wal-Mart

Bitter points out a pretty interesting back story to the whole Wal-Mart Bloomberg affair.  Seems that the firearms industry, and even some Wal-Mart executives were caught off guard by this.  I’ve thought for a while that Wal-Mart would like to be out of the firearms business, now it seems they might want to be out of the fishing business too.  All the more reason, I think, to go elsewhere for my outdoor needs.

Closing the Gun Show Loophole

This issue will be what the antis push the hardest in the future, because I think it’s the one goal they have that is probably most politically achievable.  But that’s not to say it’s going to be easy:

“Gun control is not an issue that any of these candidates wants to bring up right now,” Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute told ABC News the other day. “For the candidates, it’s a lose-lose.”

No, it’s not.  There is no serious grass roots movement in this country for gun control.  They can bring money to the table, they can bring media, but they can’t bring the most important thing; votes.  I did not point out this thread on the HuffPo about Obama’s endorsement by AHSA.  I wanted a chance to see how many gun control advocates actually turned out.  The answer was, not many.  Plenty of Obama and Democrat ra-ras, many of which were eagar to assure that Obama wouldn’t take away anyone’s guns, but very few people actually advocating for restrictions.  And this is a site full of the exact demographic who should be most in favor of restricting guns.  Where’s the passion?  If it wasn’t for the anti-gun groups hold on the media, no one would pay attention to them.  No one.  But back to the article:

“There are people who think engaging on this gun-show loophole is too much of a hot-button issue,” Clifford said. “I would suggest that the fact that the Baltimore Police Department seized almost 4,000 illegal guns last year shows it is a critical law-enforcement issue.”

And exactly how many of those guns traced back to gun shows?  I’m going to suggest that Sterling Clifford has absolutely no idea.  We can win on this one.  We can deliver passion, and we can deliver votes.  All they can deliver is lies and propaganda.

Did Rev. Evans Actually Say This?

I’m hoping this is a mistatement:

Thanks, Mr Horwitz, for your well-spoken(written) words. We have work to do to build a more wholesome and safe society. There was some debate about this “protest” on a day of “remembrance.” Yet it felt so appropriate. When the focus is on the anniversary of the tragic events, it seems pertinent to give attention to better ways forward.

Emphasis mine, but the quotes aren’t.  This is in regards to the “lie-in” held at Virginia Tech.  Is the Reverend doubting this is a day of remembrance for a lot of the families and victims?  That seems hard to believe, for a man who was a pillar of the community in the aftermath of the tragedy.

Sorry Reverend, I can’t agree with you on this.  The lie-in was a protest, meant to advance a political position.  Thirty-two people laying down and playing dead is a macabre way to remember such a tragedy, don’t you think?  Is it really “so appropriate?”  I have little problem with people using the example of tragedy as a justification for advocating certain political positions, but this was a day of remembrance for a lot of people. Virginia Tech deserved to have a quiet and reflective day.  We have 364 other days of the year to argue about the politics.

Blast from the Past

Anyone who knows Philadelphia City Paper knows it’s about as close to Worker’s World Daily as you can get without being Worker’s World Daily.  This article from eight years ago, other than some minor details, it could have been written today.  It highlights Project Exile, which has morphed into Project Safe Neighborhoods.  It’s not a program, from a principle standpoint, I was ever comfortable with, since it implies that all federal gun control is constitutional, and that all violations should be death with severely.  As applied to violent criminals, I have little problem, but as applied to someone who, say, puts too many foreign parts in his rifle, well, let’s not get crazy.  I don’t trust federal prosecutors to always make that distinction.

But Project Exile’s value was demonstrating to the public that more gun laws were not needed, which has done a lot to stop the clarion call for more gun control every time crimes or mass shootings attract a lot of media attention.  It was important for the public to understand that there were a) already a lot of gun control laws on the books and that b) they weren’t being enforced rigorously.  For City Paper to have covered this issue in a balanced and positive manner, as did many other typically anti-gun media outlets at the time, was a public relations coup.  What is achievable in terms of gun rights is mostly limited by public opinion, most of whom believe in a right to own a gun, but who are also willing to accept some restrictions.  Much of the population, with no familiarity at all with firearms, their capabilities and limitations, would accept more restrictions than you or I would.  The “enforce the laws we already have” meme has been a powerful one, and it’s one that resonates with much of the public who are on the fence.  It’s both sincere, in the sense that most of us agree with locking up violent criminals, and a tactic.  It does not preclude us from working to improve the existing laws to be less infringing of the rights of honest gun owners.

Obama Endorsed by AHSA

Obama has been embraced by American Hunters and Shooters Association, a group that claims to stand up for hunting, but who’s actual purposes is to provide cover for anti-gun politicians who want to give the appearance of being pro-sportsmen when they have never been any such thing:

“Sen. Obama will be a strong voice an unabashed voice for America’s hunters and shooters and it is with great pleasure that we endorse his candidacy,” President of the Association Ray Schoenke said, citing Obama’s commitment to the traditions of gun ownership.

Let’s remember how Obama supports the shooting community again:

  • Advocating that handguns be banned
  • Advocating a comprehensive ban on all semi-automatic firearms
  • Sponsoring legislation that makes it harder to get a license to possess a firearm, which is required under Illinois law.
  • Voting against a measure as US Senator that prevents firearms manufacturers being sued out of existence because their products can be used by criminals.
  • Banning any ammunition that could be used in an “assault weapon” which would include many sporting cartridges.
  • Banning all firearms sale within five miles of a school or park, meaning there would be very few places in the United States where guns could be sold.

I could keep going on, but this list is getting awful long.  This is a group that claims to support shooters.  Anyone who believes that isn’t paying attention.

Not Many Reloading

Bitter points to an article that shows only 1/4 of rifle shooters reload.  I would haver thought that number was going to be much higher these days, considering the price of ammo, and the chronic shortages of reloading supplies.  The only thing I don’t reload these days are shotgun shells and .22LR, which also happens to be what I shoot the most of.  Everything else I’m reloading.

Speaking of reloading, they are looking to restrict reloaders in Canada.  Massachusetts already restricts them in this manner.

One Blogger’s Response from Wal-Mart

Over at Firearms and Freedom, Wal-Mart responds.  I still haven’t gotten anything yet.  If I get the same thing, I’ll let everyone know.  I find that response to be wholly inadequate, and while I understand Wal-Mart’s desire to be a “responsible retailer” they were already doing that by following the relevant state and federal regulations in regards to firearm sales.  This is not about being a responsible retailer.  If you want my guess, it’s about opening stores in New York City.  Wal-Mart is free as a business to decide these are reasonable steps, and I’m free as a consumer to shop elsewhere, which I will do.