SHOT Show & New Media: What’s Right, What’s Wrong, & The “Nice Attempts” in Between

I’m not going to SHOT, but I’m going to cover it anyway. How, you ask? Easy, I’m going to focus on new media opportunities taken and missed by SHOT organizers, SHOT participants, and the firearms/hunting community as a whole.

There are a few “facepalm” examples, and some signs of real innovation from the community and industry leaders in terms of new media presence. I’ll cover them both and spare no feelings in the process.

First up: Ruger

We already know about Ruger’s likely new product announcement since it broke on blogs before anywhere else. I’ll be curious to see how, if at all, this changes their launch. I doubt it changes a damn thing since most of the industry guys are too busy preparing to have much time to do change up their plans. In fact, I questioned whether it would even be noticed that the blogosphere already posted pictures since it happened the Sunday before the show. I suspect at least Ruger knows since the original picture was linked to on their servers, whether the rest of the outdoor media noticed is anyone’s guess.

rugerlogoInterestingly, Ruger is offering up videos from the show floor this year. So far, the first video merely explains what they will be doing with far too much head bopping. Hopefully there will be far less head bopping on the floor, it’s distracting. (I’m serious, no more head bopping!)

Overall, I’d say it’s an interesting change. It means they can link and email these in-house videos to their customers without having to hope for coverage from other outlets online. However, they are missing out on one of the biggest advantages of new media – the potential for viral videos. No, I don’t expect their SHOT coverage to make it to the video page of Fark anytime soon, but forums, blogs, and Facebook users can’t share or embed their videos. If there’s something I really like, there’s no URL for me to embed it here or share it on my Facebook account. What’s the point in that?

It’s good to see a major industry player get in on daily updates via online video or other formats, but it’s distressing to see that they choose to do it so their customers and fans can’t share their excitement with their other gun owning friends. And with the excitement over the Ruger scoop, I think that’s a big missed opportunity.

Speaking of Facebook, let’s see what Ruger has done to excite their customer base about their new offerings at SHOT…

  • Ruger Fan Page? Nothing. (425 fans missed.)
  • Ruger Group that had to be created by a high school kid from Wisconsin? Nothing, but Ruger should be alerted that there are some customer care concerns that probably should be addressed posted on the Wall. (33 members missed.)
  • Ruger Rifles Group that was created by a guy in Iowa? Nothing. (231 members missed.)
  • Ruger Revolvers Owners Group created by a guy in Michigan? Not a peep. (210 members missed.)
  • Ruger Single Action Revolver Shooters Group created by a high school student? Not a word to promote themselves and encourage users to check out some of their other offerings. (28 members missed.)
  • Ruger 10/22 Lovers Group created by a kid in Missouri? Nope. (435 members missed.)
  • Rugers are Sexy Group created by someone in Kansas? Not a single word. (112 members missed.)

My point in noting who created these groups is the emphasize that these are real gun owners. These are the users who care enough about the product to organize other users and advertise for the company on their profile. There are 1,474 users out there who could get the message through this free and easy marketing attempt. (Granted, doing social network marketing is about a conversation, so I would suggest that a company’s new media PR person sign up and join these groups to not only let customers know about new offers, but to also participate to some degree. Assuming some crossover between the groups, Facebook groups dedicated to Ruger’s product would have hit about 1,100 potential customers at zero cost and with little time commitment.) In fact, the beauty of so many different groups is that your marketing audience self-segregates for you. Now you know exactly who to pitch the new revolver to as opposed to the guys who might like the new non-PC rifle.

This post isn’t meant to pick on Ruger. I’m going to look at many other companies and I can promise you that I will find even more missed opportunities. Overall, I’d say Ruger has a positive for doing video from the floor, but needs work to really harness the advertising power of their fans.

Gun Show Recommendation in Virginia

Looks like they managed to stop a recommendation of banning private sales.  Very good.  What they got was this:

Despite some opposition Tuesday, the commission recommended that lawmakers consider requiring Virginia State Police to be on hand at some gun shows to help monitor firearms transactions. The cost of the troopers’ presence would be borne by gun show promoters.

What exactly are they going to monitor here?  I would say no harm in this if the cost wasn’t pushed to the promoters.  Not all shows are large, and profitable enough to cover this.  I have no problems with law enforcement being present at gun shows, in fact, I think they should be.  But if the people arguing for this suggest it’s a public good, the public should bear the cost.

NPS Struggling With New Regulations

It’s funny, because law enforcement agencies around the country don’t seem to have any problem dealing with this issue.  I can see where there might be some problems though, in that state boundaries inside the park might not be well delineated everywhere, but that problem certainly isn’t unique to National Parks.  There’s also issues with federal facilities:

Not only that, but the feds have their own rules and regulations. One prohibits guns in federal buildings or facilities, but just what constitutes a federal facility isn’t clear.

“A visitor center is an easy one,” Nash said. “Our administration building is another easy one. It’s not clear to us at this point … [if] every structure would be classified as a federal facility even though we own it.”

The uncertainty extends to concessionaires too. Is a building still a federal facility if it is run by a private company?

Actually, this is something that should be deflined more clearly across the board, but what constitutes a federal facility is pretty clearly defined in 18 USC 930:

The term ”Federal facility” means a building or part thereof owned or leased by the Federal Government, where Federal employees are regularly present for the purpose of performing their official duties.

So if the concessionaires are not federal employees, they aren’t federal facilities.  Outhouses, under this guideline, would also not be considered federal facilities, because federal employees are not regularly present.  Of course, the law also says:

(h) Notice of the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) shall be posted conspicuously at each public entrance to each Federal facility, and notice of subsection (e) shall be posted conspicuously at each public entrance to each Federal court facility, and no person shall be convicted of an offense under subsection (a) or (e) with respect to a Federal facility if such notice is not so posted at such facility, unless such person had actual notice of subsection (a) or (e), as the case may be.

So they have to post, or notify you in some other way, in order for them to convict you.  But I can see the confusion.  Most other agencies wouldn’t have to deal with this problem, since their facilities are more cut and dry.

California Leavin’

California is shedding population faster than any other state.  Who knew that people wouldn’t want to live in a state with high taxes, overpriced real-estate, schizophrenic business regulations, bad gun laws, and earthquakes.

But before the rest of us start partying like it’s 1984, they have to move somewhere, and they take their voting patterns with them.  It’s kind of like The Borg.  You will be assimilated.

Recession Busting Meals

Glenn Reynolds blogs about this ridiculous story at CBS News about how to cook on a budget.  A “recession busting” budget of $35 dollars a meal.  The slow cooker swiss steak we made last night was less than $10, and could have easily fed a family.  Are these recession busting meals for former Wall Street execs who now find themselves faced with the horror of having to live like ordinary, every day rich people?  No wonder the old media is going down the toilet.

Tavor TAR-21 Seen in Gaza

Nothing like a little gun p0rn to round out the night.  Looks like the Israelis are deploying the Tavor TAR-21 assault rifle to some troops in Gaza.  They can be seen in these videos:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5TXvrl9CO4[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHhs9ihSmbU[/youtube]

Also in the news, apparently Israel is using the Ruger 10/22 at long ranges to suppress rioters in the West Bank.  Anyone throwing rocks is a deadly threat to anyone within range of the rocks.  I don’t see why people have a problem with this.  Also, if anyone’s curious, the items being worn on the helmets of Israeli soldiers is the Mitznefet, and is part of their camouflage.

So Long Mike Sullivan

Mike Sullivan has resigned as director of ATF. I will be the first to admit when I am wrong. I originally said that the Bush administration would end with Mike Sullivan in charge of ATF, despite any opposition to his confirmation. It’s a week to go until Bush is out, so pretty clearly my prediction was off.

UPDATE: Turns out the resignation isn’t effective until January 20, so I guess I was right after all.

Washington Getting Wealthy

Radley Balko talks about Washington D.C. wealth boom:

If we look at household income, the picture grows starker. After the 2000 Census, the richest county in America was Douglas County, Colorado. By 2007, Douglas County had fallen to sixth. The new top three are now Loudon County, Virginia; Fairfax County, Virginia; and Howard County, Maryland. All three are suburbs or exurbs of Washington, D.C. In 2000, 14 of the 100 richest counties were in the Washington, D.C., area. In 2007, it was nine of the richest 20.

Radley points out in the article who’s expense DC is getting rich at, and the answer is yours.