The Difficulty of Specter’s Switch

Bitter asks in the previous post about whether Specter will want to keep his A-rating from the NRA.  Specter is politically weak, and NRA is a good ally to have in your corner in Pennsylvania, even if your a Democrat.  I don’t think he can afford to piss off the NRA right now.  But it’s actually a bit of an issue for Bitter and I if he keeps his endorsement.

The issue is, we’ve yet to have an endorsed Democrat running for any office.  This makes it a lot easier for us to work through the GOP, instead of the individual campaigns, in order to provide support for our endorsed candidates.  When we had ourselves and our volunteers manning phone banks this past election, it was through the Republican Federal Committee of Pennsylvania.  The calls were going out to benefit all the federal candidates in our district, all of whom happened to be endorsed, and all of whom were Republicans.  We didn’t have to choose between who we lent our time to.  We could shill for all them at the same time working through the GOP.

If in 2010, Specter wins the NRA endorsement as a Democrat, we’ll have to go back to working through the individual campaigns at the federal level.  As much as I hate Arlen Specter on several other issues, and will loathe having to volunteer for him, it’s my commitment in my role as a volunteer to help NRA deliver the votes to their endorsed candidates.  I take that seriously, because when endorsed candidates lose, it feeds the perception, currently being molded by our illustrious Governor, that NRA endorsements don’t help you in Pennsylvania.  So as much as I hate Arlen Specter as a citizen, as an NRA election volunteer, I’ll help him out if he wins the endorsement.

It’s times like this I wish I had some pro-gun Dems who wanted to help out candidates.  That way I wouldn’t have to get my hands dirty with Arlen.  If he wins the Democratic primary, I do hope I can recruit some pro-gun Dems who want to help him out.  I want Specter to stay true to his current A-rating, because it would better to have two candidates fighting over the gun vote than not.  But if Specter goes down in the Dem primary, I can’t say I’ll be all that disappointed.  I’d like to be able to throw my support fully behind Pat Toomey.

As much as the thought of having to help out Specter in 2010 bothers me, you don’t win friends in politics by throwing them off the boat at the first sign of rough seas.  In politics, you don’t always get good choices.  It’s not a game for people who prefer things to be black and white, and the choices to be easy.

New Yorkers Find New Ways to Kill Each Other

Mayor Mike Bloomberg tells people that if we just take away the guns, we will get rid of the violence.  Unfortunately, New York criminals are embracing their entrepreneurial spirit.

In 2008, even as gun killings fell, the number of killings committed with knives or other “cutting instruments” rose 50 percent in New York City, the Police Department said: to 125 from 83.

The news gets worse for the law abiding because fatal stabbings rose faster than gun deaths fell. Once again, we prove that criminals will find ways to attack the innocent regardless of the gun laws.

As you read deeper into the article, the NYPD spokesperson appears to lament the easy availability of knives and lack of restrictions in getting them. Fortunately for taxpayers, the community activists who arrange gun “buy backs” acknowledge that there isn’t enough money in the coffers for them to conduct knife “buy backs.” It might be time to join Knife Rights if you live in New York.

A Good Letter to the Editor

I found a great example of a well-written letter to the editor.  It’s sharp, witty, plays off a kernel of truth with just a little exaggeration (but not too much!), and gets people thinking about the issue.

Unfortunately, it was submitted by an anti-gun activist.

That doesn’t mean we can’t learn from it.  If there are any readers in south Florida, a well-written response would likely get published.

Tune in to Cam & Company Tonight

We talked earlier about a public school teacher in New York who’s taking his kids to Albany to protest gun rights.   I just got this tip from Cam Edwards of NRA News:

Saw your link to the story about that history teacher and his lobbying/field trip to Albany later this week.  Wanted to let you know that we did about a 30 minute interview with Mr. Espinoza this afternoon and will be playing it at 11 p.m. tonight.

This ought to be good.  Be sure to tune in, either on the web site, or on Sirius Patriot 144.

Rendell Says Gun Control Not Likely

Rendell says he’s going to try, but it’ll be difficult.

The governor is also pushing for the re-enactment of a federal assault weapons ban. He says he doesn’t expect the president to put it on the table now, but hopes it can be raised after health care is addressed.

I was debating putting a feature on this blog that counts down the days, minutes, and seconds until the end of Ed Rendell’s governorship.  I think I’m going to have to do that when the time closes in.

Can We Ask for a Little Decency?

Tam seems to have collected herself a troll, and a particularly nasty one at that, who appears to be this blogger showing here.  My issues with the threeper movement are much less based in what they believe than you might think.  If a bunch of guys want to get together and play Army of Defending the Republic, it’s no skin off my back.  It’s a free country.  But could we please do it without being flaming dickheads?  Thank you.

I know there those out there of threeper persuasion, who are honorable, respectable folks, so I don’t mean paint too broadly with this brush, but you guys have some angry, nasty people on your side of the fence, and people will judge you by the company you keep.

Understatement of the Year

From an article in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette talking about Obama and Rendell driving gun sales up:

“The president believes the Second Amendment creates an individual right, and he respects the constitutional rights of Americans to bear arms,” an official said in an e-mailed statement. “His administration is committed to protecting the rights of hunters and other law-abiding Americans to purchase, own, transport and use guns while stopping firearms traffickers and keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and others prohibited from owning them.”

But it’s safe to say that many gun owners don’t trust the president.

You don’t say!  I can’t possibly imagine why that would be.

Nary a Mention

The Lancaster media covered the Ted Nugent “Live Free” rally, and here’s a complete accounting of their coverage of Bryan Miller’s protest:

From ABC 27 Lancaster County:

A small group held a silent protest outside of the rally. They said they are not against gun rights, but that Nugent sends a violent message.

Not against gun rights?  This is not the Bryan Miller I knew.  From LancasterOnline:

While he spoke, 16 people protested across the road from the club entrance.

That’s it?  The people who were at the pro-gun side of things had to pay 150 dollars a head to be there.  And we still outnumbered them by an order of magnitude.  So that’s going to be it? Miller gets his name in one article in the Lancaster media market?  I think I could generate more than 16 people to protest a gun control rally, and without using the blog.   How the mighty have fallen.