Interview With Kyle Cassidy

Author of the photo journal Armed America: Portraits of Gun Owners in Their Homes, which is on Bitter’s coffee table, and is an excellent collection of photography.   Head over to GunPundit for the intervew.

UPDATE: Just noticed something:

That’s a good question too. When I was going to take that photograph I said “let me just move those pizza boxes out of the way” and my girlfriend, who was with me at the time, said “What? Are you crazy?” and she was right. They do really help make that photo. I did ask Dan what the deal was with all the pizza boxes and he said: “I miss recycling day a lot.” So that’s it. He orders out a lot and isn’t always around on recycling day.

Dan is someone familiar to many of us, because he’s president of a certain PA gun rights organization.

Injunction Granted

A judge has blocked the City of Philadelphia from enforcing its gun control ordinances:

Common Pleas Judge Jane Cutler Greenspan is granting the National Rifle Association’s request Thursday to keep the ordinances from taking effect right away. The NRA argues that Pennsylvania law prevents municipalities from regulating guns.

So, the question is, how far do you want to push this Mayor Nutter and Commissioner Ramsey?  Do we want to risk contempt of court charges in addition to civil rights violations?  Still want to enforce your laws?

Defeat for Gun Control in IL

The RKBA movement is becoming extremely effective at keeping Daley and Blagowhatshisname’s agenda at bay.  Maybe they’ll soon be able to start reversing losses, and we can hit them with a combined strategy of litigation post-Heller, and grass roots action.  Armed and Safe told us yesterday that Daley would make his move on the anniversary of Virginia Tech (this date is a refuge of scoundrels everywhere it seems).  Well, it would appear Daley has gone down in flames.

Illinois is a good example of how effective we can be when NRA and its state affilate work together and are effective together.  It’s a pity Pennsylvania’s state Rifle and Pistol Assocation are mostly useless politically.

More on Wal-Mart

Bitter points out a pretty interesting back story to the whole Wal-Mart Bloomberg affair.  Seems that the firearms industry, and even some Wal-Mart executives were caught off guard by this.  I’ve thought for a while that Wal-Mart would like to be out of the firearms business, now it seems they might want to be out of the fishing business too.  All the more reason, I think, to go elsewhere for my outdoor needs.

Closing the Gun Show Loophole

This issue will be what the antis push the hardest in the future, because I think it’s the one goal they have that is probably most politically achievable.  But that’s not to say it’s going to be easy:

“Gun control is not an issue that any of these candidates wants to bring up right now,” Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute told ABC News the other day. “For the candidates, it’s a lose-lose.”

No, it’s not.  There is no serious grass roots movement in this country for gun control.  They can bring money to the table, they can bring media, but they can’t bring the most important thing; votes.  I did not point out this thread on the HuffPo about Obama’s endorsement by AHSA.  I wanted a chance to see how many gun control advocates actually turned out.  The answer was, not many.  Plenty of Obama and Democrat ra-ras, many of which were eagar to assure that Obama wouldn’t take away anyone’s guns, but very few people actually advocating for restrictions.  And this is a site full of the exact demographic who should be most in favor of restricting guns.  Where’s the passion?  If it wasn’t for the anti-gun groups hold on the media, no one would pay attention to them.  No one.  But back to the article:

“There are people who think engaging on this gun-show loophole is too much of a hot-button issue,” Clifford said. “I would suggest that the fact that the Baltimore Police Department seized almost 4,000 illegal guns last year shows it is a critical law-enforcement issue.”

And exactly how many of those guns traced back to gun shows?  I’m going to suggest that Sterling Clifford has absolutely no idea.  We can win on this one.  We can deliver passion, and we can deliver votes.  All they can deliver is lies and propaganda.

Did Rev. Evans Actually Say This?

I’m hoping this is a mistatement:

Thanks, Mr Horwitz, for your well-spoken(written) words. We have work to do to build a more wholesome and safe society. There was some debate about this “protest” on a day of “remembrance.” Yet it felt so appropriate. When the focus is on the anniversary of the tragic events, it seems pertinent to give attention to better ways forward.

Emphasis mine, but the quotes aren’t.  This is in regards to the “lie-in” held at Virginia Tech.  Is the Reverend doubting this is a day of remembrance for a lot of the families and victims?  That seems hard to believe, for a man who was a pillar of the community in the aftermath of the tragedy.

Sorry Reverend, I can’t agree with you on this.  The lie-in was a protest, meant to advance a political position.  Thirty-two people laying down and playing dead is a macabre way to remember such a tragedy, don’t you think?  Is it really “so appropriate?”  I have little problem with people using the example of tragedy as a justification for advocating certain political positions, but this was a day of remembrance for a lot of people. Virginia Tech deserved to have a quiet and reflective day.  We have 364 other days of the year to argue about the politics.

Regular Readers

According to Google Analytics, which I had apparently not noticed was broken by the theme changeover, this blog has approximately 14,000 regular readers.  This is based off loyaltry trends that show the number of people who have visited at least 26 times in the past 3 months is roughly that number.  Whether you come here directly, or get sent here thorugh someone else, thank you.

Of course, this is assuming I’m calculating things correctly, which depends on understanding google’s terms for visitor and visit, and google using their own terms properly.

Blast from the Past

Anyone who knows Philadelphia City Paper knows it’s about as close to Worker’s World Daily as you can get without being Worker’s World Daily.  This article from eight years ago, other than some minor details, it could have been written today.  It highlights Project Exile, which has morphed into Project Safe Neighborhoods.  It’s not a program, from a principle standpoint, I was ever comfortable with, since it implies that all federal gun control is constitutional, and that all violations should be death with severely.  As applied to violent criminals, I have little problem, but as applied to someone who, say, puts too many foreign parts in his rifle, well, let’s not get crazy.  I don’t trust federal prosecutors to always make that distinction.

But Project Exile’s value was demonstrating to the public that more gun laws were not needed, which has done a lot to stop the clarion call for more gun control every time crimes or mass shootings attract a lot of media attention.  It was important for the public to understand that there were a) already a lot of gun control laws on the books and that b) they weren’t being enforced rigorously.  For City Paper to have covered this issue in a balanced and positive manner, as did many other typically anti-gun media outlets at the time, was a public relations coup.  What is achievable in terms of gun rights is mostly limited by public opinion, most of whom believe in a right to own a gun, but who are also willing to accept some restrictions.  Much of the population, with no familiarity at all with firearms, their capabilities and limitations, would accept more restrictions than you or I would.  The “enforce the laws we already have” meme has been a powerful one, and it’s one that resonates with much of the public who are on the fence.  It’s both sincere, in the sense that most of us agree with locking up violent criminals, and a tactic.  It does not preclude us from working to improve the existing laws to be less infringing of the rights of honest gun owners.

Obama Endorsed by AHSA

Obama has been embraced by American Hunters and Shooters Association, a group that claims to stand up for hunting, but who’s actual purposes is to provide cover for anti-gun politicians who want to give the appearance of being pro-sportsmen when they have never been any such thing:

“Sen. Obama will be a strong voice an unabashed voice for America’s hunters and shooters and it is with great pleasure that we endorse his candidacy,” President of the Association Ray Schoenke said, citing Obama’s commitment to the traditions of gun ownership.

Let’s remember how Obama supports the shooting community again:

  • Advocating that handguns be banned
  • Advocating a comprehensive ban on all semi-automatic firearms
  • Sponsoring legislation that makes it harder to get a license to possess a firearm, which is required under Illinois law.
  • Voting against a measure as US Senator that prevents firearms manufacturers being sued out of existence because their products can be used by criminals.
  • Banning any ammunition that could be used in an “assault weapon” which would include many sporting cartridges.
  • Banning all firearms sale within five miles of a school or park, meaning there would be very few places in the United States where guns could be sold.

I could keep going on, but this list is getting awful long.  This is a group that claims to support shooters.  Anyone who believes that isn’t paying attention.

Why Nutter Isn’t in Jail

Jeff Soyer asks:

So why isn’t Nutter in jail?

It’s something I’ve been hearing a lot of, but the short answer is that the law has to be enforced before possible civil and criminal penalties come into play, and as best as I can tell, the city ordinances aren’t being enforced yet.  There’s no penalty for passing a law in violation of preemption under Pennsylvania law, so the act of merely passing a gun control ordinance is not itself illegal in the sense that you can go to jail for violating it.

Penalties don’t come in until someone attempts to enforce it.  Under our system of government, a law that is unconstitutional is essentially not law, so any arrests made under the Philadelphia gun ordinances would be done under color of law, which opens the arresting officer, and the people all the way up the chain of command, to liability under the Civil Rights Act of 1871.  The Civil Rights Act allows for state and local officials to be stripped of their immunity and to be sued as individuals, rather than in their official capacity.  For local government officials, they may be sued in both their official and personal capacities, since local governments are not considered sovereigns, don’t enjoy sovereign immunity.

There are also criminal penalties, both federal and state, which can apply, but prosecution under these statutes is rare, and when it has happened, it’s been difficult to get convictions.  In order to press criminal charges, either the local Assistant United States Attorney would have to bring charges, or the Pennsylvania Attorney General.  But as with the civil case, the law has to be enforced before there’s criminal liability.