Buy a Toy Gun for Your Kid, Police will Shoot Him

Police officials in the UK have started a new public awareness campaign.

Parents are being warned by police not to buy their children realistic looking toy guns this Christmas as it could lead to them being shot by armed marksmen.

And Happy Holidays to you, too! I’m so glad to hear that the warmth of the Christmas season is prefaced with a threat from the police that if you buy your child a toy firearm, you may be condemning him or her to a death sentence. Even better, the gun control supporter quoted in the article agrees!

First, the police:

“People are increasingly aware of the potential for firearms in our midst and, quite rightly, call us whenever they see something resembling a gun. Whether this gun is an air weapon, BB gun or genuine firearm, our response is the same.

“While they are legal to own, parents must ask themselves whether it’s really appropriate for children to have these guns. If they do, they must learn to use them responsibly. We cannot have situations where innocent members of the public are injured by missiles they or we fire.”

I almost don’t know where to begin. So armed response units are the first response to a report of a 6-year-old with a toy? Second, why do their BB guns fire missiles? Third, why are the cops there so under-trained with their guns that their spokesman simply assumes they will miss a target and kill innocent bystanders?

And then let us go back to the comment that it is right to call the police anytime you see someone with anything that resembles a gun as opposed to someone simply with a gun. If that’s the case, I guess I should have called the cops when my nephew used to eat his bread into the shape of a gun. Or how about when he took his finger & thumb to pretend to shoot at things around him? That “handgun” (get it?) was awfully dangerous with its shape fitting that of some pocket pistols.

How far do we take this insanity? I ask that not because I’m reading this wrong and the police are only warning against people who paint their obviously toy guns to look like real ones. The police are asking parent not to buy any gun-shaped toy – whether it’s a clear purple water gun or an orange BB gun. They already have laws against realistic-looking guns, but police are now asking citizens to go further. It just shows that fears of a slippery slope are not unfounded.

While a civil liberties group rightly calls this a phantom problem, Mothers Against Murder & Aggression say there is no other way to deal with this manufactured issue.

“If a child is waving a toy gun around in the street police have no choice but to turn up with an armed response unit.”

Really? No other way at all? You mean to say that a child carrying this menacing Super Soaker justifies the use of a SWAT team? Although I suppose that the mad Mothers may find the particular model to be particularly threatening since it minimizes the need for going home to refill & you are only limited in your shots by how many bottles you can carry.

Gaming Book Sales

Since it has been a topic of conversation recently, I look forward to Dennis Henigan’s swift condemnation of Obama’s campaign manager who is coordinating online to alter books sales data.

David Plouffe, in a 2008-throwback, message-heavy, direct-to-camera video, rallies Obama supporters to “see if we can use some of our old organizing techniques and spread the word” — to sell more copies of Plouffe’s book than Sarah Palin’s.

If you’d like to see the full appeal, here’s the video:

Now, I don’t condemn so-called book bomb tactic. It’s a strategy to hype buzz for one day, or, if you’re lucky, a series of days. It’s not terribly far off from the tactic the Brady Campaign has used to game book reviews with 5 stars on Amazon. It’s a temporary shift, and it doesn’t really mean much in the long run.

That said, if you want to play David Plouffe’s game of trying to drown out the voices who don’t agree with Obama, might I suggest that tomorrow is a wonderful to day buy Going Rogue? Two can play at this game…

Small Dent in New Jersey Licensing Law?

According to Cemetery:

I’ve heard rumors of a new NJ FID system coming to NJ, which would join the digital era, and somehow, once this license is obtained, there will be no need to visit the local Police for permits.  Everything would happen via NICS  and point of purchase.  Which makes me think that handgun purchases, and One Gun a Month laws, will be permitted, and enforces at point of sale.  But, like I said, all I’ve heard was rumors.

If that’s true, it would be great. But the fact that they are even talking about, as cemetery mentions, making a special class of license for competitive shooters and collectors is encouraging. Keep pushing this, and don’t push the special license, just push getting rid of the purchase permits altogether. It’s New Jersey, so get anything you can, but if they are talking about it, it might be possible to just get rid of the purchase permits altogether. That would be real progress back to reasonable gun laws.

More Details on Wisconsin Microstamping Bill

This article from the Wisconsin State Journal hints at some more details in the Wisconsin microstamping bill.  You can find the actual bill here. It’s pretty bad. One of the worst bills I’ve seen so far. Here’s what it’ll do:

  • Requires a stamp to be on two places on the spent casing. We don’t really know how to do this effectively. There are technologies that can imprint on the primer cup, but a chamber marking may weaken brass and make it unsuitable for reusing.
  • Ban manufacture of handguns in Wisconsin that do not produce micro stamps, even if that handgun is destained for sale outside of the state. I would imagine this will mean no manufacture will ever seriously consider locating in Wisconsin as long as this bill is up for consideration. What a great jobs program this will be.
  • Dealers are required to certify that a gun manufactured after 1/1/2011 produces microstamps before they transfer it. Being wrong is a crime. How are dealers to certify this?
  • Confusing grandfathering. Pistols made before January 1st, 2011 are grandfathered. But most pistols don’t have a date of manufacture on them. You have to call the manufacture and give them the serial number to find out. If new residents move into the state with new pistols that don’t microstamp, they aren’t permitted to sell them in the state except to a dealer. Presumably, though, if you have a post-microstamp handgun that doesn’t imprint, you’ll probably just be presumed guilty until you prove your innocence.
  • Fixing a broken pistol is now a misdemeanor, unless you get parts that make the correct microstamp. No replacing firing pins or barrels.
  • Guilty for normal wear? All microstamping technologies have the stamp degrade over time. Will gun owners end up prosecuted because their microstamps have worn out? How will the authorities distinguish between worn markings and deliberately altered markings?

This is not an anti-crime measure, as the bill states. This is just a means to harass gun owners. It’s time for gun owners in the badger state to start getting angry, but don’t forget they are also pushing a “Lost and Stolen” bill as well. It’s been a tactic, it would seem, to introduce more than one bill, in the hopes gun owners focus on the really bad one and ignore the lesser evil. Don’t fall for it.

This crap will come to other states. It’s already on the table in New York State as well. I would note the Wisconsin bill has no exemption for police officers, so if I were manufacturers, I would make it clear they will not sell guns in Wisconsin, including to police agencies, if this law goes into effect.

A Very Gunnie Christmas

Good news for those looking to snag a copy of Aiming for Liberty – it’s back in full stock at Amazon.

But, as I was looking (and laughing) at the “Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought” section. It made me think that Amazon should have an “Authors Recommend More Reading” section. That would be interesting to see what authors who write great books suggest for further reading on a topic. Then I remembered, “Wait! Hottie Dave has given us just such a guide in a previous NRA mag!”

Here are the links for those who wonder:

  1. Armed America: The Remarkable Story of How and Why Guns Became as American as Apple Pie by Clayton Cramer – Come on, support another blogger! Actually, there’s news on this front. I didn’t realize that the paperback just came out in August. So now you can save some money and still grab a great read.
  2. Supreme Court Gun Cases by Kopel, Stephen Halbrook, and Alan Korwin – Unfortunately, this one seems to be out of print, or at least Amazon isn’t carrying it much anymore. However, a related topic book that might be of interest is Brian Doherty’s Gun Control on Trial: Inside the Supreme Court Battle Over the Second Amendment.
  3. Target Switzerland: Swiss Armed Neutrality In World War II by Halbrook – From Kopel: “Halbrook’s book shows not only how the Swiss militia system deterred the recurrent threat of Nazi invasion, but also how the militia system created, in the long run, a culture of civic responsibility devoted to the preservation of liberty. It was Switzerland’s militia-centric culture of republican virtue that was the key reason why liberty survived in Switzerland, even as it was extinguished almost everywhere else in continental Europe.”
  4. Origins and Development of the Second Amendment: A Sourcebook by the infamous David Hardy – Since the book is out of print, you might consider “In Search of the Second Amendment” instead.
  5. Gun Control and the Constitution: Sources and Explorations on the Second Amendment edited by Robert Cottrol – Prof. Cottrol is at the top of my list of absolutely fascinating people. I don’t event need to actually hold a conversation with him, just listening to him always keeps my attention regardless of the subject. Alas, the book is only available directly from Amazon in the library binding which is $150.
  6. The Origin of the Second Amendment: A Documentary History of the Bill of Rights in Commentaries on Liberty, Free Government & an Armed Populace edited by David Young – Again, support yet another blogger! This has been cited in important cases, including several times in Heller. Again, not widely available, but some order information does appear on this page. One of the more entertaining sights I’ve seen though is David carrying his copy of the book with important arguments marked with multiple colors of post-its.
  7. Targeting Guns: Firearms and Their Control by Gary Kleck – Kleck’s research is a staple of many pro-gun arguments. Yet how many people have actually read him? Heh, thought so.
  8. To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right by Joyce Lee Malcolm – Another recommended read to supplement Malcolm’s book is her sequel, Guns and Violence: The English Experience.
  9. Death by “Gun Control”: The Human Cost of Victim Disarmament by Aaron Zelman – I don’t know much about it, so I’ll just quote Kopel: “The book examines the 20th century genocides in Turkey, the Soviet Union, China, Guatemala, Cambodia, Uganda and Rwanda, and details how each of them was preceded and facilitated by gun control programs to disarm the victims.”
  10. The Global War on Your Guns: Inside the U.N. Plan To Destroy the Bill of Rights by Wayne LaPierre – Since you can order directly from NRA and support the fight in your purchase.  Two birds, one stone, yay!

Other suggestions Kopel includes: For the Defense of Themselves and the State: The Original Intent and Judicial Interpretation of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms by Cramer, Gun Laws of America by Korwin, Swiss and the Nazis: How the Alpine Republic Survived in the Shadow of the Third Reich and That Every Man Be Armed by Halbrook, The Second Amendment Primer: A Citizens Guidebook to the History, Sources, and Authorities for the Constitutional Guarantee of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms by Les Adams, Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Stupid White Man by Hardy, and Armed: New Perspectives on Gun Control by Kleck and Don Kates.

And finally, if you’re literally looking for a very Gunny Christmas, R. Lee Ermery’s site actually has Gunny dolls.

I promise, this wasn’t just an excuse to do an Amazon link dump.  I really did wonder about what authors would recommend to their readers other than other books they have written.  I assume if I was curious about such things that others would be, too.  Since I remembered Kopel’s article from a couple of years ago, but didn’t have a solid link list, I figured now was a good time to create one.  Finally, I have been busy making Christmas ornaments and reading of some chick lit, so I haven’t been doing much as much blog reading.  (Oh yeah, and I may have recently been perusing related titles in my search for Christmas gifts for both a gun nut and a history buff [the gun nut’s dad].)

How Long Has it Been?

I feel like I won’t recognize the range when I finally go back on Monday night. During one of the last airgun competitions, my gun broke. Sebastian bought himself a new airgun, but the one I stole from him is still broken. But then I went out of town. And then I got sick. And then Sebastian got sick. And before you know it, it’s a holiday. I haven’t been to the range in more than a month, and illness has kept him away for almost a month.

How long does it take before you start feeling like a stranger on your regular shooting range?

An Interesting Take on Women & Shooting

I don’t really know how to describe this piece in a British magazine about a woman who gives shooting a try. I suspect my questions are more directly related to cultural clashes than anything. It’s obvious that in light of current laws, our shooting culture is radically different than that of Great Britain. So there’s the element of knowing she’s probably not trying shooting sports that would really catch her fancy, but there’s also more of an economic disparity in the shooting culture.

I don’t know, it’s just interesting.

The before perspective:

When I was asked recently whether I wanted to go shooting, I felt torn. It’s clearly very fashionable at the moment, as Charles Moore’s story about Cherie Blair and Lord Mandelson at the Rothschilds shows. But shooting is unutterably bloody, if you’re a woman.

It starts with a long drive to a big house, encumbered by a vast array of boots, hats, gloves, jackets and thermal underwear, as well as sparkly evening outfits. You spend the night carousing, and in the morning the men – henceforth to be referred to only as ‘guns’ – wake early and pad about in heavy, Scott-of-the-Antarctic tweeds that smell of gun oil, reeking breeks, and long, gartered woollen socks in amusing colours.

A massive cooked breakfast is underway.

The guns’ gossipy wives are wearing tight cashmere sweaters and showing off their bottoms in Austrian leather britches, and reading Richard Kay in the Daily Mail.

After brekker, everyone – i. e. guns, women in britches, dogs – totters out via the gun-room and gents’ and forms up in front of a selection of mud-spattered offroaders that wouldn’t look out of place in Baghdad’s Green Zone. They listen to the head keeper’s announcements about not shooting ground game or each other, and the guns are handed their peg numbers.

They all pile into the Land-Rovers and Subarus, etc, to sit packed like sardines with wildly aroused dogs who nuzzle crotches and try to get to second base with everyone on board. You want to faint from the combined odours of old Barbours, coffee breath and dog. You wonder what on earth you are doing there. The chatting, the flirting, the delicious meals, the dressing up, the hours on the M3 already seem like a distant, Vaseline-tinted dream. For it is now that the misery truly begins.

‘Shooting is hellish, I haven’t for years, ‘ says Emma Soames, echoing David Cameron’s careful line that he hasn’t shot for ages and has no plans to do so again. ‘It’s brain-numbingly cold, ear-splittingly noisy, and bone-crunchingly dull. And worst of all, you can’t even walk, you have to just stand there.’

That’s my objection, too. It’s so boring and cold. After bumping along to the first drive, you have to stand in squelching mud by your gun while he fires at the birds and swears.

You are only allowed to open your mouth to say ‘good shot’ when he hits a pheasant, after which it plunges to the ground hard by, twitching in its death throes. Your teeth chatter and you wish that you’d worn the down anorak even though it makes you look like an enormous chalet girl and you remember too late Nancy Mitford’s advice on surviving point-to-points, published in the Lady, which was: ‘Nobody will notice what you are wearing: they will be feeling far too wretched themselves to think of that.’

You long for the quad bike to arrive with elevenses of grouse soup and fruitcake, and possibly a pistol so you can quietly go off into a culvert and shoot yourself. None of the guns would even notice. They’re too grimly focused on the important business of blasting as many birds out of the sky as they can. After a hearty elevenses, it’s back to freezing mud and raining pheasants till lunch, which is always a big beef stew, lots of claret, followed by crumble. Everyone drinks and goes red in the face until the head keeper lurks in the doorway.

Then she explains that a movie producer invited her to learn to shoot. She claims that it is the stylish thing to do in upper crust circles since it is much more like golf with a shotgun for networking, so of course she jumped at the chance.

So I said yes, please, and so on the appointed day I was picked up in a Bentley (thanks, Bentley – the letter’s on its way) and conveyed to the 100-acre Holland & Holland shooting ground, with its landscaped grounds, and uniformed staff serving bacon baps and coffee. It became instantly apparent that Willie was right. Shooting has indeed become ‘wildly glamorous’. The place was thick on the ground with models, film-makers, designers, the glossy posse and the titled heads of Europe. It was like Studio 54, only with flat caps and Purdeys.

Soon after arrival, I was introduced to a tall, dark, handsome man who was strapping a shoulder pad on, to protect himself from the recoil of the gun. I made an admiring noise, at which he gallantly reached down and handed me his spare. ‘Are you sure?’

I stammered. ‘It will be even more valuable to me after you’ve worn it, ‘ he insisted with heavy gallantry. I later found out it was Prince Nikolaos of Greece.

Wow. A prince gave her a spare recoil pad. I guess I’ll have to be happy with my on-the-bra version of a Past recoil pad bought off of Amazon.

As for the actual sport – piece of cake!

Basically, anyone who can see and move their arms and fingers can do it. With steady Mike Colwell at my side, I felt like the shooter in the Day of the Jackal: eagle-eyed, poised, hair-triggerish. The thought even crossed my mind, as I smashed clays, that if my husband is kindly invited to Exmoor and Gloucestershire and Scotland to shoot again, then I could have a crack too.

And this, of course, would solve the problem of female shooting misery at a stroke, those hours of standing motionless in driving rain with nothing to do between meals while the gun blasts away happily. And yet, and yet.

Could I really? I enjoy shooting clays. But could I really kill warm feathery things just or pleasure? Yes, happiness is a warm gun but being able to feel your extremities is fun too.

I suppose I’ll just have to wait and see.

So in one trip, she’s a convert to shooting as a sport, and possibly to hunting. That’s pretty damn impressive.

The last time I took a European student to shoot, she was also an immediate convert on the sporting side of it. We never really discussed the other issues like right to self-defense and the right of individuals to own and have access to firearms, but I got the impression she was either already with me on those. She was extremely independent and eventually got involved in smaller government groups. Of course, when I did an interview with a European reporter, she was absolutely appalled by the story. She was convinced that I somehow corrupted the poor little French girl with my crazy American attitudes and our wild, gun slinging ways. I just smiled. :)

Aiming for Liberty Interviews

Dave Kopel recently did an interview with “Independent Thinking” out in Colorado to talk about his new book, Aiming for Liberty. He discusses whether anyone other than him has read all 12 of his books – 12! – and I realize what a terrible fangirl I am by not having read all of them. Perhaps more importantly, and relevant to the readers here, is how he debunks many myths of guns and crime while giving important context to the debate.

Dennis Henigan Discovers the Grassroots

A very honest admission from Dennis Henigan, VP with Brady Center, about the difference between our two communities. He’s speaking of his book, Lethal Logic: Exploding the Myths That Paralyze American Gun Policy:

Third, the “hogwash” votes reflect not only motivation, but organization as well. It is fascinating to me that organized efforts have been underway to sink the book under the weight of “1-star” reviews. On several websites followers are urged to send in negative reviews of the book (without, of course, urging them to read the book first). Gunbroker.com urges readers to “bury this book,” while giving helpful instructions on how to do amazon.com customer reviews. The Maryland Shooters Association suggests that its members post some “good” (meaning bad) reviews on amazon. These efforts obviously have had some success. Amazon prominently displays an “average customer review” for each book, which for Lethal Logic struggles to reach “3-stars” against the organized “1-star” campaign.

Two forums does not organization make, I would say. I’m not even sure how highly trafficked those forums are compared to, say, AR-15.com or PAFOA. So if Dennis Henigan is feeling the heat now, I can’t imagine what he would think of a serious Zumbo level campaign. But have no fear Mr. Henigan, we in the gun rights community seem to reserve the greatest ire for our own, rather than you folks on the other side. I would not be so quick to judge a whole community by the actions of a few.

I am of the opinion that we should obtain and read the books and writings of our opponents. A confident movement does not feel the need to elevate itself by disparaging others, hiding from controversy, or seeking to achieve victory in the public debate by shouting down opposing ideas without taking them seriously or understanding them. That’s how we go from a strong and confident movement to a weak one. That’s how new tactics and strategies creep up on us and gain momentum.

Ultimately, without building our own intellectual and academic case for gun rights, and taking the opposing wisdom on guns seriously, we would have lost Heller. What Dennis is witnessing might be a demonstration of grassroots energy, which our side certainly has in spades over their side, but it’s displays a lack of seriousness that I think we need if we’re going to keep this ball moving. If you’re going to give Dennis Henigan’s book a bad review, I think you at least ought to read it and come up with some real arguments for why it’s bad.