Author: Sebastian

Why It’s Not the 1930s Again

For those who are worried that we’re reliving the 1930s, whether you think we’re about to repeat nazi Germany, or even be dealt another “New Deal”, you should take a look at this electoral map of 1932:

1932 Electoral Map
1932 Electoral Map

Roosevelt defeated Hoover by a margin of 57 to 40 percent.  With the exception of Pennsylvania, Delaware, Connecticut, and rural New England, which were traditional Republican strongholds at the time, FDR won every other state, including all of The South, The West, and the Midwest.  His win in 1936 was even more spectacularly lopsided.  The last time we saw wins of this magnitude?  Ronald Reagan.

Folks, this is not a country that is about to embrace socialism, or yield to a new Obama dictatorship.  They are not about to send their sons and daughters off to join a paramilitary secret police force.  We are not living in that world.  The left pulled out all the stops, and played every play in their book, and the best they managed was 53%.

What do we have to watch for?  The things we know progressives like doing.  More government entitlements.  More gun control.  We have to be prepared to fight this national service corps, not because it’ll become the next SS, but because it’s a bad idea.  We will definitely have a tax fight on our hands.  We have to be prepared to wage the political fight of our lives to stop these measures, especially new entitlements, which are almost impossible to get rid of once you have them.  But we’re not in a death match to stave off Soviet or Nazi America.  Not yet, at least.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Cure for Optimism
  2. Compare and Contrast
  3. It’s Beer O’Clock on a Friday

Gun Sales a Terror Watch Indicator?

Apparently the folks at BioDefense Corporation think citizens exercising their Second Amendment rights are terrorists waiting to happen:

“A disturbing increase in reports that gun sales are dramatically increasing now that the presidential election is over indicates that other forms of intentional mayhem such as bio-chemical assaults might also increase,” said BioDefense Corporation ( http://www.biod.com), producers of the new MAIL DEFENDER complete mailroom security solution.

Pretty clearly it’s a short path from buying firearms to launching an elaborate bio-terrorist attack!  Sounds like they are using any excuse to drum up business to me. Either that or it’s an indication of how far out of touch with the rest of America Bostonians have become.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Another Victory in the Senate
  2. Terror Watch List Purchase Prohbition is Back
  3. Terror Watch List

Academics on the Gun Rush of 2008

From a UCLA Professor of Anthropology:

I don’t know where to begin on the current state of insanity in the U.S. Let’s see, maybe guns is a good place to start. Gun sales are reported to have risen noticeably since Obama was elected. Some of this was probably just the usual paranoid insanity of the NRA gun nuts. Some are convinced that Obama means to take their guns away. If that were true, what would be the point of buying more? But of course these new guns, along with all the others they possess, could be hidden for use when the government tries to take over their guns. When you suggest to these nuts that their rifles, pistols, and even AK 47’s wouldn’t be much use against the weapons the government could employ they either look blank or argue they should be allowed 50 caliber machine guns and even howitzers and tanks. As one of them put it the other day, “if you can tow it behind your pickup it ought to be legal.” Who can argue against such logic (insanity). As near as I can determine Obama has a perfectly sensible approach to the problem of guns, recognizing the difference between the needs of rural dwellers and inner city gangs and etc. He has never suggested taking away everyone’s guns. But nothing is sensible when it comes to the NRA.

I’m always amazed at the total lack of respect of people of the left have for our beliefs and arguments.  Just crass dismissal, without even an attempt to intellectually refute us.  You’re just “nuts” and “paranoid.”  Especially when it’s pretty clear this university professor has never bothered to investigate Obama’s record on guns, which includes a lengthy career of trying to destroy the Second Amendment.

And finally, there is the tired notion of an armed population being obsolete.  I’ve said in the past, you can’t stop your government from killing you, but the use of political violence, which is one of the evils that the Second Amendment is meant to protect against, is not about killing for the sake of killing, it’s about coercion.  It’s about forcing people to submit to the will of others who wish to rule over them.

These are radical ideas, and not something I think most people sitting in the ivory towers of academia really wish to think about.  I can’t say I blame them.  They are unpleasant ideas, representing circumstances very different than we currently face. But societies looking to avoid such unpleasantness have often found it, and been unprepared.  Our good professor would like to dismiss us because we choose to engage in the intellectual exercise.  It’s part of the Bill of Rights, and something our founders, having just emerged from a successful revolution, thought about a great deal.  I think we do them a disservice if we don’t keep their ideas alive and relevant, regardless of how sound our political system is at the moment.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. The Rush to Buy
  2. Glum About 2008
  3. 2008 Election Roundup

This Isn’t Going to Help

Congressman Broun of Georgia is warning of an Obama dictatorship:

Broun cited a July speech by Obama that has circulated on the Internet in which the then-Democratic presidential candidate called for a civilian force to take some of the national security burden off the military.

“That’s exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it’s exactly what the Soviet Union did,” Broun said. “When he’s proposing to have a national security force that’s answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he’s showing me signs of being Marxist.”

Obama needs to invoke Godwin here and declare victory.  I’m not exactly in favor of Obama’s plan for national indentured servitude of young people, but can we dispense with the fear mongering and start worrying about why large numbers of Republican voters stayed home this election?   Can we start worrying about why young people are increasingly lost to Republican candidates?   Obama won.  Get over it.  He’s not going to be the moderate centrist people are hoping for, but he’s also not going to be Hitler or Joe Stalin either.  I can promise you I won’t like what’s coming, but right now we have to worry about being strong opposition, not floating paranoid theories about brownshirts.  I expect to find that kind of crap coming from obscure web sites and blogs (you know, like this one), not from the mouth of a United States Congressman.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Drunk With Power
  2. Rebuffed?
  3. Hawaiians Arming Themselves in Record Numbers

Beyond the Election

Michael Bane talks about moving on.

Part of our moving forward battle plan depends on how things play out in Washington. In light of the challenges out there, the most logicial thing would be for guns to be back-burnered, which would be a best-case for us because it gives us more time to prepare.

I agree that now is not the time to panic, but to organize. President Obama will have other priorities heading into the new year.  It took Clinton a while to get around to screwing us too.  If we play our cards right, we might be in a good position heading into 2010.  Now is the time for organization.  We also need to be thinking about how to raise money in an organized way to help candidates who support our issues.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Joe Grace Looking To Run for City Council
  2. Find a Job for Bitter
  3. The 2010 Election Begins

Clearly It’s a Gun Lobby Plot

Thirdpower comments on Bryan Miller’s latest bit of crap on the increase in gun sales being a gun lobby plot.  I really love this bit from Bryan, personally:

You can see it, can’t you? The ‘boys with their toys’ using any excuse to do the old: “Hey, Honey, because (Obama was elected, a big snow is predicted, an old tree looks frail, any excuse for a new toy) I need to go down to the (gun shop, hardware store, etc.) and pick up a new (gun, snow blower, chain saw, whatever).”

In our household, we got his and her guns in honor of the impending Obama Presidency.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Can’t Take the Snow
  2. New Jersey Assault Gun
  3. Plot to Assassinate Obama?

Quote of the Day

Tam takes exception to an IPSC detractor who says competition isn’t combat:

Well, thank you for tipping me off to that fact, Enrico Fermi. Here I thought all along that I was training myself for that grim and inevitable mugging by five bowling pins in a sunny, grassy alley some pleasant weekend morn. Glowering at me from their table in plastic-coated malice, they’ll stand in a straight line and… well, do whatever it is that criminally-minded bowling pins do, I guess.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Bowling Pin Shooting
  2. Ram Pin of Glory
  3. Sunday Full Auto Fun