Pennsylvania Carry Permits Surge Along with Gun Sales

I find it amazing that anti-gun groups still try to use the line that the only people lining up to buy guns are people who already own guns. If that was the case, we wouldn’t see the same surges in something like concealed carry permits that aren’t something you buy multiples of in your home state. Gun sales and permits in the Keystone State are surging in the last few days.

Joe Staudt of Staudt’s Gun Shop in Harrisburg was sold out of his usually large stock of AK-47 and AR-15 semi-automatic weapons by Wednesday. … The store Staudt opened in the spring of 2011 had record sales Monday, but Tuesday “is now our new record day,” he said. …

At Grice Gun Shop in Clearfield, which bills itself as Pennsylvania’s largest gun shop, the phone was busy much of the day. A recording asked callers to be patient and said the store was swamped because of the holiday season and “the recent gun-ban rhetoric.”

The article notes that the surge isn’t just for guns, but concealed carry licenses, too. They report that applications are up all over the state. They interviewed the Greene County Sheriff who reported that their previous record was to process 110 applications in one month. Yesterday alone, they had 40 applications in hand hours before close of business. He reportedly told the reporter that as people drop them off, they pick up new applications for friends and family who are convinced to get a permit, too.

(h/t to commenter DannytheMan for the link!)

Specific Steps You Can Take to Oppose the Coming Obama/Biden Gun Controls

In case you missed the first post yesterday, I’m going to do a short series on the topic of contacting lawmakers over the next few days with specific ideas for various communities of gun owners to expand their reach. Whether you’re just some gal who owns guns and finds their “gun community” online, own a commercial gun range or shop, or are a member of a community gun club, I’m going to collect specific actionable, easy ideas for you to think about.

Today’s list is for community/non-profit gun clubs. Anything advised here should be taken into consideration with the legal structure of the club.

  • All club outreach needs to consider two things: One is the power of all of the individuals who could, in theory, contact lawmakers from one region. Two is that the club itself should act on behalf of members, but not at the expense of direct member-to-lawmaker communication. By acting in its own voice, the club’s message to lawmaker is that we don’t just have X number of gun owners in your area, but we have a COMMUNITY of X number of gun owners and their families in your area. That kind of organization is a signal to lawmakers.
  • If your club leadership is hesitant just because they haven’t done something like this before, then get on them. That actually makes their voices more powerful at the moment. If a lawmaker gets a letter from a club in his district that he has never heard from before, their staff will know it. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing at the moment because it signals new activism on our issue in response to the proposals.
  • Send letters on behalf of the board of the club – with permission from the board, of course – to every federal and state lawmaker that represents at least a handful of your club members. Do not leave anyone off just because they are anti-gun. You want to send the message that if we’re even pestering you, the known vote against us, just think about what how we’re writing to your colleague you you want to pull over to your side.
  • At your very next club meeting – whether it’s tomorrow or next month – get your board to agree to set up an area for all attendees to write a letters to their lawmakers. Make it easy for them. Provide a few versions of a similar letter -maybe be a little more focused on mental health on one, make another just generic and nothing more than “no more gun control,” and another might mention a little more in the way of cultural concerns – where your goal is to give people a choice in damn near anything they might want to say, but don’t know how to write themselves (or are too lazy to write themselves). Have blank sheets that are simply pre-addressed at the top. If your club has the equipment, or you can get it there, get a few computers there, with a printer, and offer to type up whatever the members want to say and print it right there on the spot for them to sign. Then, collect these letters and either fax them in to the offices or mail them in individually. Don’t leave it to members to send, have someone from the club handle delivery. Get the club to furnish stamps, if needed. Make sure all communications have an address on them so the member gets a response.
  • Make the above the standard activity post-meeting for next couple of months. Advertise it in the newsletter and put it out to the club email list. Tell people to come down and someone with experience in contacting politicians will help them out if they aren’t sure what to say. If the equipment is on-site, then work with shooting committees to have someone organizing the same thing for their big shooting nights. This is potentially more effective because you can tell shooters exactly what kinds of guns are being threatened. Trap night? Did you know the one of the more recent versions of a McCarthy gun ban would have outlawed every single semi-automatic shotgun? Pistol night? I hope you don’t like regular-sized magazines.
  • Give the people who participate something beyond a thanks and a pat on the back. Does your club require work hours? Give them credit of a work hour for participating and leaving you with three letters to fax or mail. Does the club have any kind of raffle or drawing? Give a special entry to anyone who participates (depending on the laws in your state on this issue). If the club is really serious about involvement and can afford it, then give club members who participate a credit on their dues for the next renewal. It shouldn’t be a paltry amount, but the exact value should be in reasonable proportion to the membership fees.
  • Does your club host competitions that draw from outside of the normal membership? You’ve just expanded your sphere of influence! Ask match directors to set up a table at their match with a sign/write a letter station. Again, if you can target talking points to the guns used, that’s even better. And, hey, what’s a better introduction in a letter than, “I’m writing you as I take a break during a competition shooting my semi-automatic rifle that anti-gun groups want banned. There are dozens of people from your district right here in front of me who will lose their sport and their primary home defense option if you ban our firearms.” Does the match have the financial wiggle room to offer a discount to those who write their letters? A few bucks off for people who participate and leave their letters to be faxed or mailed is an incentive. Or, if the match/club doesn’t have wiggle room, how about asking a member if he/she can make/donate lunch for the competition that might “cost” people a few bucks, but give a free plate to anyone who writes letters?
  • Target your club email list by district as much as possible. If you have a particularly weak potential ally in your area like we do, then make sure that your club members with emails get a special email that tells them their help is needed to go above and beyond. Let them know that their interactions asking their lawmaker to defend their rights is particularly important because it’s possible that he/she could be feeling extra pressure from anti-gun groups or partisan groups who normally don’t work on gun control, but want to exploit their position on it.
  • When making the pitch to club members and shooters, give people specific examples of what is proposed in your state. Even the most informed gun owners may have missed something breaking from within their own state since so much is being discussed at the federal level right now. We have a powerful talking point since one suburban lawmaker here is calling for confiscation. Not even Dianne Feinstein is talking about taking things that far.
  • Get permission, if needed, to hang a sign on the relevant ranges that talks about the kinds of guns used on that range that will be banned. Add photos if that will garner more attention. Make it so that casual shooters who may not be the most attentive or the most involved in the competitions or leagues will have the information right in front of them.
  • Ask the match directors and various shooting discipline organizers within the club to write specific letters, too. Tell them to mention that they organize a regular match with an average of X shooters of these types of firearms every month, or they run the weekly shoot that has X number of participants. It’s about showing that we have community that we will talk to and mobilize from every single corner we can find.

Like I said in the post for commercial ranges & shops, give members who normally aren’t involved in politics an incentive that shows your club values their effort to defend gun rights. The other strength in non-commercial gun clubs is that these are voluntary communities that have self-organized. Gun control activists try to tell lawmakers that DC-area organizations direct all pro-gun action of a tiny minority. Show these lawmakers that it isn’t true. We have our own local communities, and we will organize outside of any top-down approaches.

I know there are many other ideas for longer term political involvement, such as hosting a fundraising shoot or dinner for a lawmaker, but this list is focused on immediate action in regards to pending gun control issues. However, I would encourage those of you with ideas on that fron to share in the comments so that people can find out what other clubs do to help our cause.

Specific Steps You Can Take to Oppose the Coming Obama/Biden Gun Controls

I feel like we always assume that people know “what to do” to act when big gun control is coming down on law-abiding gun owners. It’s often summed up as “call your lawmaker.” But, the fact is that the process of opposing these things probably should be spelled out a little more.

I’m going to do a short series of posts on this topic over the next few days with specific ideas for various communities of gun owners. Whether you’re just some gal who owns guns and finds their “gun community” online, own a commercial gun range or shop, or are a member of a community gun club, I’m going to collect specific actionable, easy ideas for you to think about. Today’s list is for gun shops and commercial gun ranges.

  • Every person who comes in the store or range will, at some point, provide you with an address. Look that address up and immediately had that person a business card or sheet of paper with the following information: Their two Senators, their Congressman, and the state’s Governor’s office. Your customer base likely only comes from a couple of Congressional districts, so make the effort to get that local.
  • If you have room, set up a table with paper, pens, and envelopes – pre-addressed if you really want to make it easy. If there’s a wait, strongly encourage people to sit down and write 3-4 letters – one to their Congressman, their Senators, and (if relevant for state concerns) the Governor. Put out sample language and talking points taped to the table to get them started. Put up a collection box for the completed letters, and eat the cost of a stamp to mail them all. This way you know they make it to the lawmakers. If you don’t want to worry about stamps and envelopes, put your fax machine to use and fax them in throughout the day. Just make sure people include their mailing address in the letters if you choose this option.
  • Offer a discount or freebie of something to people who prove their participation in the issue. Maybe they complete the above letters and get a coupon for $5 off of their next purchase, or even get a gift card to Starbucks if you’re concerned about the process of issuing coupons. Perhaps they get a free range session on their next visit, or can upgrade to a more expensive-to-rent gun. You could also tell people that if they have already sent letters, they can bring in the response from their lawmakers to show and get the discount or coupon.
  • If you already have some kind of points/frequent renter club, give extra points to those who participate in the letter-writing campaign. If you do this, don’t make the reward very small. Make it worth their while. Make the statement that you value their participation in the defense of our rights at a big dollar amount. It could be the same as spending $25 in range fees or something equally big. Don’t give them a credit that’s equal to like 50 cents of spending. That shows that you don’t value participation at all. (If you don’t currently have any kind of points/rewards club, the perceived dollar value of anything else you give them doesn’t matter quite as much since it’s a new perk, not one comparable to other perks.)
  • Set up a pay-as-you-go cell phone (choose the option to pay per day used, not by minute) and put it at the counter with the phone number to all area lawmakers – federal and state – with a couple of sample scripts. Tell customers to give the offices a call right there.
  • Post a petition-type letter that opens with something “we the undersigned members of the InsertLocationHere lawful gun owning community” and make a letter that’s pretty focused on the gun issue. Then, leave lots of spaces and pages for people to sign their names and include at least their cities or zip codes. Collect signatures until you fill a sheet (or more sheets) and then mail it in to all of the regional lawmakers.

The point in these suggestions is that you need to translate to your customers that they will lose their rights if they don’t stand up, and that you VALUE their participation in defending gun rights. It’s not just a mumbled “good job” or pat on the back.

For some, these suggestions may be a bit late for the rush. But, if you have a mailing list of customers, let them know if you set something like this up. It encourages them to come back, even if you don’t have the rifle or ammunition they want in stock. Getting feet back in the doors is ultimately good for business.

Live Blogging the White House Press Conference

The White House has announced that Obama will inform the American people about his policy process for more gun control today in a press conference. Considering the way the announcement is worded, I expect that not only will he back specific demands in legislation for the next Congress, but he will pick which parts of Bloomberg’s plans to implement that don’t require any Congressional input.

I will live blog the press conference when it starts, so look to this post for updates.

LIVE UPDATES:

While we wait on the White House (presumably they are running late since their own feed is just showing a blue screen), we do know that Joe Biden has been assigned the role of White House lead for the gun control efforts.

Okay, we’re watching the major networks get ready to do their openings, and some blonde flip her hair.

Obama: He says we don’t know why Newtown happened, but we know that Americans are killed by guns. It’s not just about mass killings, but we need more gun control. He’s happy to see nameless high profile people change longstanding positions on guns.

The fact that whatever he’s going to propose won’t likely stop violence doesn’t mean we shouldn’t restrict guns anyway.

Biden has a January deadline, and he’s going to take immediate action. Obama says he won’t wait at all, not wait on people to study the policies he’s going to enact.

He tapped Biden because he was a sponsor of the semi-auto ban. He says that a majority of Americans support gun control like gun bans, magazine bans, and ending private sales.

He calls on Congress to act quickly. He blames Congress for not appointing his ATF choices.

Obama says that he “is betting” that gun owners would be the first to say that we should ban semi-auto rifles. (Hint: Make clear to your Congressman that he is betting wrong.)

Obama is now talking about every person shot since Friday.

He focuses on using every power, so that’s likely to mean damn near every one of Bloomberg’s plan, but he hasn’t mentioned it specifically. Time will officially tell if that’s the blueprint he uses, but he’s making clear that he won’t allow time for debate over the proposals.

Obama says that we are obligated to help him pass his agenda. We aren’t courageous if we don’t agree with his plan.

Obama is taking questions before turning it over to Biden. The first question is actually asking him if he has betrayed voters by his actions in fiscal cliff negotiations.

After several minutes, Obama is still on the defense about his position on taxes and spending.

Wow. Second question is also on fiscal cliff & his actions in negotiations.

Third question – fiscal cliff agreement questions on whether he has any trust in Republicans anymore.

Fourth question – back to guns, but basically told that presidential commissions are pointless and ineffective. Obama says that he will reach out to “stakeholders” who he will not name, Biden will round up “cabinet members who are interested,” and come up with suggestions for actions that will be featured in the State of the Union.

The reporter asks about the NRA, and Obama says that mothers and fathers who are members of NRA need to do self-reflection and help him out. He claims that “a thoughtful approach” is needed, that responsible gun owners “may carry out their activities” – activities which he is refusing to define.

The final question is from Jake Tapper who says that Obama hasn’t been around on the gun issue even though he campaigned on it the first time. Obama swears he hasn’t been on vacation, but that this is a wake-up call. Obama says that healthcare is relevant to this debate, and that’s why he spent his time on it.

Of the yelled questions while Obama was leaving, the reporters were asking about Benghazi.

And, with that, the White House feed has turned the camera and mics off so we cannot hear what Joe Biden has to say.

I’m trying to see if other news outlets are carrying his statements. So far, every news outlet website I have surfed to has cut out and isn’t covering Biden, either.

Okay, so I’m hoping that C-SPAN recorded the Biden remarks and will include them with their video archive later on. By the time I thought to check their site, they had cut over to a Benghazi report issue. I don’t know if that’s because they didn’t carry Biden or if his remarks were just short with no questions from the press.

Okay, so Biden left the room with Obama based on C-SPAN’s camera angle. I guess he didn’t speak at all.

The NRA Statement

This was just posted to the re-published Facebook page:

The NRA is made up of four million moms and dads, sons and daughters – and we were shocked, saddened and heartbroken by the news of the horrific and senseless murders in Newtown. Out of respect for the families, and as a matter of common decency, we have given time for mourning, prayer and a full investigation of the facts before commenting. The NRA is prepared to offer meaningful contributions to help make sure this never happens again.

Amen to that.

UPDATE: And, a very bold announcement about a press conference on Friday.

State Gun Control Action – Pennsylvania

It’s time to start talking politics because the politicians are talking about more specific bills, even ones that they acknowledge have nothing to do with the Newtown shooting, but they want to pass anyway.

In Pennsylvania, we’ve got the following reports from various politicians calling for more restrictions on law-abiding gun owners, both federal and local.

Federal Lawmakers
Sen. Bob Casey – As the media notes, now that Sen. Casey is no longer running for re-election, his office is actually going on the record that he’ll gladly ban guns.

When pressed to clarify Casey’s stance, an aide said everything is on the table, including an assault weapons ban, an about-face from a stance he took after the Aurora, Colo., movie theater massacre in July. At the time, his office said Casey, who was facing re-election, would not support legislation banning assault weapons.

From the same article, we see that Sen. Pat Toomey and Rep. Charlie Dent are focusing on the mental health concerns.

Rep. Chaka Fattah – Rep. Fattah is going straight for a gun ban federally, but the sources are light on details like whether he will introduce one to compete with the ban promised by Sen. Dianne Feinstein or will simply back her planned bill.

U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.) also got behind the calls to limit assault weapons and clip capacity.

Rep. Allyson Schwartz – As a frequently tossed around name for the Democratic nominee for Governor in just over a year, we find from the same article above that she’s refusing to answer any questions about specific bills she supports, simply summing things up as new gun laws. She also refused further interview on the subject. I would say that her response is pretty much the clear writing on the wall that she’s going to run statewide. Gun owners would be wise to remember that she’s F-rated for a reason.

Rep. Mike Doyle – Rep. Doyle has made clear that he not only supports a ban on semi-automatic rifles, but also seemingly wants to ban every semi-automatic firearm based on his comments bemoaning the lawfulness of handguns.

“I just don‘t understand the civilian use for semiautomatic weapons, or these clips that hold 30 rounds. That‘s not how you hunt deer,” said Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills. Doyle said he supports reinstating a ban on military-style rifles that expired in 2004. … “If this young man went into his mother‘s house and all she had was a six-shooter and a hunting rifle, there would not have been this many dead,” Doyle said.

Rep. Bob Brady – From the same article above, we see that he wants to ban all private transactions of firearms, ban guns, and limit how many guns that law-abiding gun owners who pass all of his other new proposed restrictions can buy.

Rep. Bob Brady, D-Philadelphia, said Congress should go further by requiring more extensive background checks, closing the so-called gun show loophole — which allows people to buy guns at shows without a background check — and restricting gun purchases to one a month.

Guns such as the Bushmaster rifle don‘t “belong in anybody‘s hands unless they‘ve got a uniform on and they‘re fighting for the United States,” Brady said.

From his comments, it sounds like he also wants to ban police departments from using semi-automatic rifles.

State Lawmakers
Rep. Steve Santarsiero – Early out of the gate, Rep. Santarsiero came out calling for a gun ban in Pennsylvania that would ban not only sale, but possession. The proposal would make tens of thousands of law-abiding residents instant felons.

I will be sponsoring a bill in the new legislative session that would outlaw both the purchase and possession of assault weapons such as those used in Connecticut last Friday. I know that similar efforts will be made at the federal level –and I sincerely hope that they are successful — but that fact should not prevent us from moving forward with our own legislation here in Pennsylvania. Moreover, I understand that at least one of the bills being considered at the federal level would only prohibit the purchase of these weapons on a going forward basis. If such a limited bill were to become law, it would leave a considerable loophole that we here in Pennsylvania should and, indeed, must close.

To him, the current lawful possession of firearms is a “loophole” that must be closed.

Rep. Daylin Leach – After admitting that there’s not a cure-all solution to a crime where a madman was willing to kill his own mother in order to obtain guns to commit a greater tragedy, Sen. Leach doesn’t hold back on the two primary gun control bills he has backed for years that have nothing to do with the Connecticut situation.

But he says he thinks of two bills right away when it comes to gun safety – one would limit a person’s gun purchases to one a month… Another bill would require people to report lost or stolen guns to police within two days of finding the gun missing.

Again, the goal is to limit how many firearms a law-abiding gun owner who has already gone through state and national background checks is allowed to purchase. (Sen. Leach did question the right to own semi-automatic firearms to another media outlet, but made no mention of wanting to ban these common rifles.)

Rep. Ron Waters – In the same main article linked above, we find that the House will have another advocate for banning semi-automatic rifles.

Philadelphia’s Ron Waters says he’s proposed banning such guns four or five times, and he’ll introduce the measure again next year.

West Virginia Gun Owners Plan Protest of Joe Manchin

Plans are shaping up for a protest of Sen. Joe Manchin who promised West Virginia’s law-abiding gun owners that he would respect their rights, and has now declared that he wants to ban guns that aren’t relevant to his interpretation of the Second Amendment – the right to hunt.

The organizer suggests that people do not open carry because of legal concerns, and another attendee has suggested some good ground rules: “No camo, no bullhorns, no sticks, no burning in effigy, we will get TV coverage… We need to be normal, just like at the meeting in the rotunda.” They are also encouraging the state’s gun owners to call his office because he’s apparently already feeling pressure.

Media Working Against Your Rights

Many gun blogs have been highlighting the fact that NBC Sports has decided to cancel “3-Gun Nation” in light of the Connecticut tragedy. I think that it is most useful to point out this:

Philadelphia-based Comcast Corporation, owner of NBCUniversal and one of the biggest spenders in lobbying money in Washington, has given $206,056 to Mr. Obama and $20,500 to Mr. Romney.

We cut the cord years ago and stopped giving over more than $100/month to support their Democratic donations. That’s just a reminder.

Besides, getting people involved with the shooting sports is much more fun than sitting around and watching them on tv.

The Issue of Mental Health Treatment from a Social Worker

The following is a guest post from my mother. She recently retired from her job as a social worker, a role she has had in various forms going back to the Johnson administration. She’s a gun owner, but you won’t find her on the range often because she’s too busy with her grandchildren. She’s hardly a raging libertarian, but also saw the many weaknesses of government programs to address many problems. These are simply some of her quick thoughts after watching the news today and reflecting on her personal experiences with the mental health programs over the last few decades.


It is heartbreaking to see what has happened today, as well as what has happened in other similar incidents. In these situations, it has been established that the majority of the individuals involved have had major mental health issues. After having just retired from more than 40 years in social services, I have seen many, many changes in handling those who are mentally ill.

Back in the early 80’s, we started mainstreaming mentally ill folks back into society, even those who clearly were not capable of functioning without some sort of structure. I agree that we need to understand mental health issues and must learn to distinguish those from those who are treatable and are capable of following treatment from those who, without structured guidance and possible mandated medication and treatment, are not able to function in mainstream.

We closed many hospitals, which I agree many needed to be updated and made more humane, but by not improving those facilities, we turned many people out on the streets without any form of support. Those people were left to become homeless, unable to manage medication, unable to take care of their personal needs, etc., and many of those turned to crime not because they were a bad person. They had no conception of right or wrong, they weren’t on medication, and they often have no family to assist them. Or, perhaps they had family that cared or had family who become emotionally burned out and/or financially strapped and unable to function themselves. It is a sad state we are in and, while I don’t have answers, I do know we need to look at what needs to happen in our mental health programs.

It seems it’s easier for the government to give them a check, food stamps, than deal with real treatment programs. My sister currently works as a case manager for mental health and her caseload is off the charts with no way to require her clients to comply with treatment or take medication correctly. The result is that some end up in jail for some type of crime or homeless because they couldn’t function enough to properly take care of their lives.

My heart breaks for the families and children, I just pray that the wrong “cause” isn’t made the issue instead of looking at the “real” issues of what’s happening here.

The New Red Dawn

Last night, Sebastian treated me to a movie and finally had a movie theater experience that he found remotely pleasant. We picked the 10:35pm mid-week showing of a movie that’s already been running for several weeks, so the theater was empty. Warning, there are some spoiler-like comments ahead. But then again, it’s a damn remake. You should already know the larger plot.

There was a line in the opening sequence about everyone asking how the North Koreans could actually manage to become a serious military strength to threaten a country like the United States. That’s exactly what serious viewers would ask, too. Now, I realize that the North Koreans weren’t supposed to be the original enemy, but that’s how the final product was released. Therefore, I think it’s reasonable to criticize just how much the filmmakers expected us to suspend disbelief.

I did miss the line about the 4473s from the original, but I can understand why they would want to cut that for a wider audience. The fact is that only gun owners who seriously understand the political process of gun regulation really got that reference.

Other than that, I thought it was reasonable entertainment. As Sebastian noted, the urban warfare environment made far more sense for guerrilla tactics than the open countryside setting of the original movie. The heavier reliance upon explosives, even when they just ended with a gun battle, was also a bit more realistic to the narrative of causing problems for the invading enemy with more troops and firepower than the Wolverines.

I’m not going to pretend that the flick is a highbrow cultural masterpiece. It’s just a little fun with some reminders about how there are people out there willing to fight for basic freedoms. It’s better than we both thought it would be based on initial previews. It’s not an exact replica of the original Red Dawn, but it’s not so wildly off from the original that anyone who loved the fun of the original will be lost.

If you haven’t caught it yet, the number of theaters showing it after tonight will drop since it’s been out for several weeks. However, it is still performing in the top 10 of movies. In fact, in the early release, Red Dawn pulled in almost as much per screen as Life of Pi which was based on a book that became an Oprah-recommended best seller. It’s worth a few bucks to go see it.