How MAIG Seems to Operate

There’s a mayor in Freedom, New Mexico that seems surprised, maybe even a little indignant, that NRA is saying he’s a member of Mayors Against Illegal Guns.  But in an article today by the Portales News-Tribune, Rachel Parsons from NRA says something pretty interesting:

Parsons, who works at the NRA headquarters in Fairfax, Va., said several other mayors across the country also have told her organization that they attended an MAIG event and were put on the membership roster although they never signed up to join.

So it would seem that Bloomberg’s group is signing mayors up for the political equivalent of saying “hi,” and then signing their names to statements promoting gun control.  That’s going to turn into a liability for MAIG quickly if word gets out.

New York Times More Radical On Guns than Bradys

The New York Times is editorializing against the amendment to the Amtrak bill to allow transportation of unloaded firearms in checked baggage:

Proponents said the change was needed to put Amtrak back to its pre-9/11 gun policy and equate it with airline security measures that allow unloaded, locked handguns in checked baggage. This is lunatic reasoning for a nation supposedly sensitized by the 9/11 attacks. Why should gun owners be treated as privileged travelers?

Privileged travelers? What? Right now if someone wants to go on a hunting trip, or travel to a competition, Amtrak is simply not an option. Why do we suddenly need airport level security just because we’re going to allow checked guns in the luggage compartments? The New York Times is hysterical. In addition to that, they have no idea what they are talking about when it comes to this issue, and pretty clearly don’t understand how guns are legally transported on aircraft.

From the Bad Idea File

The Firearms Blog looks at a version of the Glock with a thumb safety. As Caleb says:

So, awesome business decision if Glock gets the contract, and now you’ll be able to shoot yourself in the leg with your Glock after accidentally ejecting the magazine!

If you want a gun with an manually operated external safety, the Glock isn’t the gun for you. Imagine if British soldiers had a hobby they could take part in that would teach safe and competent pistol handing before the got to the military?  Nah, too dangerous.

Who Knew?

There are apparently 75 votes in the House of Representatives for organizations that promote child prostitution.  But I can’t get a repeal of the Hughes Amendment on the table because it’s too radical?   Something is very very wrong in Washington.  Apparently there are at least three Democrats in Pennsylvania’s delegation who think taxpayer money funding child prostitution rings is just peachy.   They are Bob Brady, Mike Doyle, and Chakka Fattah.  I am very glad no Republicans went along with this crap.  I guess it’s easier to hold the anti-paedophilia coalition together with Mark Foley out of Congress.

Meet Molly

During the Gun Blogger Steel Challenge match in Reno over the weekend, I got badly beaten by a thirteen year old girl.  Her name is Molly Smith:

Molly

Molly is the one in the middle, with Keewee and Bea, our other two female shooters, on either side. Of course, she’s not just any 13 year old girl.  She happens to be a junior world champion at Steel Challenge and sponsored by Smith & Wesson. So I can’t say I feel bad about losing to her, and really, I was happy to come even within a country mile of what she can shoot.  Here’s a video shamelessly stolen from The Packing Rat of her shooting with us. She is fast:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0bsWRSV2bU[/youtube]

Molly is also a gun blogger, who blogs about her competition.  I think what Molly does is great, and I appreciate that she and her family are still fighting the good fight in California. I asked her dad how much California’s restrictive gun laws interfere with being able to remain competitive in a sport like Steel Challenge, and his answer was that they interfere a lot. Someone of Molly’s skill and potential deserves better than the State of California is giving her. I want to thank her for coming out to Reno, and reminding me why I continue to dedicate so much time and energy to this issue.

Smart Rhetoric, But Will Anyone Buy It?

It was probably intended that if MAIG were ever attacked by the NRA, they’d cry foul and claim it as evidence that the NRA were out looking to arm criminals with the illegal guns they are supposedly against.  We’re seeing that already.

From Tallahassee:

“To keep illegal guns out of the hands of criminals and terrorists and that is the fundamental objective of this organization,” says Marks. Marks says the American Hunters and Shooters Association supports the mayors group and sent out letters this week claiming “the NRA has been sending false information about what Mayors Against Illegal Guns stands for” and says “to take them head on.”

And we know that AHSA is a gun control group disguised as a pro-gun group.  MAIG is an organization that’s dedicated to keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and terrorists by ensuring that they stay out of the hands of law abiding people too.

Modesto California, where the Bee is doing its level best to carry the water for Bloomberg:

Last week, he and three other California mayors — also under attack by the NRA — resigned from MAIG. His name and photo are gone from its Web site.

“I support the police and I also support Second Amendment rights,” Ridenour said. “Originally, (the mayors) were talking about illegal guns.”

They say they still are. The NRA claims they never were.

They talk about illegal guns.  Their policy proposals have nothing to do with illegal guns, or locking up the people who use them or traffic in them.

From Vineland, New Jersey:

“People that obtain guns illegally or carry guns illegally, that’s what I’m against,” Romano said. “I don’t want people to think I’m against legal guns. I’m not.”

He has made that clear to the dozen or so local NRA members who have contacted him since receiving the NRA’s mailing last week.

It takes more than showing off your judge to convince me.  MAIG isn’t just against illegal carry, they are against legal carry too, as demonstrated by the policies they support.  They are also not supporting policies of getting tough on traffickers, only restricting legal sales.

From Orlando Beach, Florida:

“The National Rife Association is basically trying to make mayors look like they are against all guns,” Costello said. “And that’s absolutely not true.”

It is true, unfortunately.  They advocate the same policies as the Brady Campaign, pretty much across the board.

There are more out there if you look.  The gauntlet has now been thrown down.  What are we going to do about it?  It’s time to start writing Letters to the Editor, and writing letters to the mayors in your area to make sure they are not confused.  We have to let people know about what MAIG is really up to.  Don’t let them get away with painting themselves as going after criminal gun use.  They are a gun control group cleverly concealed, and people need to know about it if we’re going to win this.

Bias Much?

Open Secrets is usually pretty good about sticking to its mission, but they seem to be misrepresenting what the Amtrak bill is going to do.  Bitter takes them to task in the comments, but they seem to be standing by it:

Rather, the author clearly states that, 1.) The measure would force Amtrak to institute yet-to-be-crafted security measures and infrastructure to handle firearms, and 2.) Wednesday’s vote is but one step in a process toward the measure becoming law, and the matter likely won’t be resolved until it is resolved in the House of Representatives.

What yet to be crafted security measures?  The amendment doesn’t call for any security measures. Let me outline it for Mr. Levinthal, exactly how this transaction would proceed:

Gun Owner: Hi, I have a firearm to declare.
Amtrak: OK, could you please fill out this declaration attesting to the gun being unloaded, and the ammunition stored in appropriate containers, and sign it please?
Gun Owner: OK, here you go.
Amtrak: Go ahead and stick it on the train.
Gun Onwer: Thank you.

See how easy that was?  You’d think from this Amtrak had never taken guns on board prior to September 11th.  The bill does not mandate any extra security.  The burden is entirely on the person transporting the gun to comply with the transportation requirements, the same way it is on the airlines.  But let’s not let facts get in the way of the hysteria.

Arlen Apparently Not Keen on NRA Grade

Here’s the vote breakdown on the Amtrak bill.  Senator Specter was among the no votes, along with a lot of other Democrats.  Keep in mind this is a bill so modest, even the Brady Campaign doesn’t have a problem with it.  No Republican voted against it.

I think it’s safe to say that Arlen Specter’s NRA grade is toast this election.  I hope, in fact, that NRA will endorse his opponent.

Another Victory in the Senate

The Senate voted for Amtrak to allow firearms to be transported aboard trains as checked baggage, in the same manner as they are permitted on aircraft.  Amtrak is complaining they don’t have the manpower, but I don’t see what manpower they need.  Last time I took Amtrak, they didn’t exactly have elaborate security measures.  Most of what goes on in a train station is even more security theater than you see at airports.

UPDATE: Helmke:

Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said he “doesn’t have problems with people transporting guns on trains so long as steps are taken to make sure they’re secured and properly stowed.”

I guess this one was a little too reasonable for them to oppose.  It would be hard to argue against, considering security concerns are much higher on planes, and you can transport firearms on planes in checked baggage.