Fun

I was sitting in a chair in the hotel where the NRA Board Meeting is being held, and heard David E. Young joking “I guess they let bloggers in here.”

I looked over to see who was with him, and it’s Alan Gura! Looks like he’ll be at the Presidents Reception. The fun thing is so will Bitter and I.

UPDATE: Talked to Alan Gura for like 15 minutes about various cases! Cool! He called me Sebastian, so he’s at least an occasional reader. The second amendment is in good hands. All the scholars including the blogosphere’s own Dave Hardy were recognized for their contributions to Heller.

Bryan Miller Lambasting Pat Murphy

Looks like the anti-gunners might be getting upset with Pat Murphy.  Either that or Bryan Miller is behind on his marching orders.  See this Philadelphia Inquirer news roundup, and scroll down to “Under the Gun”:

U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy, whose Bucks County district includes a sliver of Northeast Philadelphia, is taking flak from gun-control groups for his support of a bill loosening gun regulations in the District of Columbia.

[…]

Bryan Miller, executive director of Ceasefire NJ, expresses outrage. “As I understand it, Murphy is joined at the hip to [U.S. Rep.] John Murtha, and Murtha is a tied-at-the-hip NRA [National Rifle Association] guy,” Miller said. “I don’t see any other reason why a suburban Philadelphia Democrat, with Philadelphia going through the horrible throes of gun violence, would sign onto a bill making the availability of guns so much greater in D.C. I think, frankly, [Murphy] should be ashamed of himself.”

So by Bryan’s logic, since he hangs around Murtha a lot, surely he must be pro-gun right?  That’s not entirely true.  He is a supporter of Congresswoman McCarthy’s ban on most semi-automatic firearms, and never signed on to a Congressional Amicus brief to end the ban.  It’s hardly surprising that Congressman Murphy, close to an election, is signing onto pro-gun bills in an effort to placate Bucks County’s numerous gun owners, hunters, and shooters.  If this represents a turnaround on behalf of the Congressman, I welcome that, but until he takes his name off McCarthy’s bill, forgive me if I suggest Bryan Miller has no clue what he’s talking about when he tries to paint Patrick Murphy as too pro-gun.

I suspect, though, that the Brady Campaign is probably wondering what they are getting for their 5000 donation to Congressman Murphy in the last election.

Two Hunting Issues

From Today’s Outdoor Wire.  First, it looks like Texas is going to be conducting a study of the effects of lead vs. non-lead shot on Dove populations.  It should be nice to have some real scientific data on this, considering the push to use non-lead ammunition because of the benefits to wildlife.  Next is an issue that was talked about at the NRA committee meeting.  Move to the bottom and you’ll find the featured article about the US Department of Fish and Wildlife winning a lawsuit brought by environmental groups to prevent the creation of water resources for wildlife in wildlife refuges.  Yeah, you read that right.  The dirty hippies were suing the federal government over making sure there was sufficient water for wildlife to drink in wildlife refuges:

The ruling is a significant win for federal and state wildlife management authorities in their ongoing efforts to improve habitat conditions that help support healthy wildlife populations on the refuge. The Arizona Game and Fish Department was granted intervener status by the court and is a partner with the FWS in restoring the desert bighorn sheep herd found on the Kofa.

[…]
Wilderness Watch and several other groups had filed a lawsuit in June 2007 in an attempt to prevent the continued operation of the wildlife water tanks. The groups argued that the FWS had followed an existing refuge management plan rather than the Wilderness Act in allowing the construction work. But the court ruled that the FWS considered both the plan and the act, and was correct in issuing a “categorical exclusion” as permitted by NEPA.

Teddy Roosevelt has to be turning over in his grave about these groups aiming to protect wilderness by ensuring that no animals can survive there.

NJIT Continuing with Development of Smart Gun

The New Jersey Institute of Technology has recieved another quarter million dollars of your hard earned tax dollars to keep researching “smart gun” technology.  Senator Lautenberg and Menendez are responsible for this earmark.  As I mentioend on Cam’s show last night when we talked about this, as an engineering problem, smart guns are a folly.

With current technology, it’s just not really possible to get a solid biometric reading from a firearm except under very controlled conditions.  Far more controlled conditions than someone breaking into your house at 2AM.  That’s why when smart guns are declared “ready” under New Jersey law, that police will be exempt from the requirement for sales of smart guns only.  This was never about safety, but is entirely about passing a gun ban that most people in that state would not recognize as such.

UPDATE: More from Robb here.

Appearance on Cam & Company

Bitter and I had a surprise appearance on Cam & Company.  Surprise to us, because we went there to say hi to Cam and ended up doing two segments on the show in studio.  I think I did pretty well!  Despite the fact that I can’t shut up here, I am not a talkative guy in real life, so having to be the social butterfly at these things is not a natural act for me.

At least until 9:00PM tomorrow, you can catch us on the rerun at nranews.com.  Just click through the introductions, and a link to the last show will appear.  Let me tell you, it’s thrilling to be on Cam’s show.  But it’s even more thrilling to have people sending talk backs for me on his show.  For you readers who have sent me stories, I will get to them.  It’s tough to blog with the NRA committee schedule, and catching up with people I know.  A lot of NRA people are reading gun blogs now, and they know who we are.  It’s quite a difference from a year ago, when NRA was just touching their toes into the bloggy waters.  Now they are in for the swim.

Legal Affairs Committee

I knew Legal affairs would be iffy to attend.  Mostly because discussion of that stuff tends to be sensitive — when you’re dealing with attorney client privileges, and with NRA being a party to lawsuits, I had a feeling we might not get to stay long.  After a brief introduction by Chris Cox, where he outlined two pronged legislative and legal approach with getting Washington D.C. to comply with the Heller ruling, the committee went into executive session and we had to leave, along with Dave Hardy, who doesn’t have a seat on that committee.

Hunting and Wildlife Policy Committee

Hunting policy was actually a pretty interesting committee meeting.  Legislative affairs is mostly stuff I’m already pretty aware of, so it’s not really anything surprising.  Most of the really interesting information comes out in the discussions in executive committee.  But this had several issues that I wasn’t wasn’t at all familiar with.

One thing NRA has been working on is right-to-hunt constitutional amendments.  Oklahoma has been the first state to pass one of these consitutional amendments, which has strong language and actually offers protection for hunters.  Other states have such amendments, but usually include wording such as “subject to the state regulatory powers.” which makes the right effectively symbolic.  Oklahoma’s has real teeth.  Right now they are working with states where the game commissions are constitutional entities, since it makes it easier to create right-to-hunt provisions, while still maintaining the comissions’ ability regulate hunting in accordance with sound wildlife management processes.

Another thing that’s happened is that the Bush Administration has declared a conference to rethink this whole North American Wildlife Conservation Model, which was established by Teddy Roosevelt nearly 100 years ago.  Some updating of policy would be beneficial to sportsmen, but obviously this model has worked for nearly a century, so major changes would not be in the interest of sportsmen.  NRA is working with various other groups to make sure this turns out to be beneficial to sportsmen.

One issue that was brought up that I think is very facinating is the issue of the fence between the United States and Mexico, which has serious implications when it comes to hunting and conservation.  The fence is apparently not planned to consistently follow the border, but will cut off significant parts of United States territory to hunters.  The fence is also meant to stop people, but it wll also stop a lot of wildlife and game species which range across Mexico and the southern United States, which will have the effect of cutting some populations of from another.  Understand that NRA is not taking a position for or against a border fence here, just that it was discussed in terms of its impact on hunters and wildlife.

Legislative Policy Committee

I had the opportunity to attend both The Legislative Policy Committee, and also the Hunting And Wildlife Policy Committee, which I’ll talk about later.  All the NRA committee meetings are starting out this year with a disclaimed about the Biparisan Campaign Finance Reform Act, and asked if anyone was working as an employee of a volunteer for a campaign for federal office.  Committee members or attendees who raised there hands were asked to recuse themselves from the proceedings as to avoid any charge of “coordination”.

After that Chris Cox went into his address.  Although Norton’s bill has been voted out of committee, if the House leadership lives up to their end of the bargain, it will be HR6691 that ends up getting passed.  Once out of The House, it will be an uphill battle to get the Senate to pass the bill before the end of their session, but NRA intends to try.

The next big issue is the National Park rule change to allow carrying of firearms for self-defense.  We were told that the new rule could be expected on or around October 8th.  Cool.

Then onto BATF reform.  There are two issues on this front.  Ongoing is the effort to get The BATF Modernization and Reform Act, HR4900 passed.  The other is that NRA has been working with Sullivan’s office at ATF in an attempt to fix ATF new ridiculous definition of “manufacturing” which even includes giving a paint job to firearms.

They are also actively working with the Transportation Security Administration to change the new rule that prohibits checking .50BMG or larger rounds in checked baggage.  This has been a big problem for big game hunters, who use the larger rounds.  Apparently a more legitimate interpretation on the DOT rules would allow calibers up to .75, which covers just about all the cartridges out there which are currently lawful.

I would also note that one of the committee members asked Chris about their blogger outreach efforts, and Chris said he was very supportive of the effort, and there was every intention of continuing these relationships.  He mentioned the NRA-ILA mix and mingle happy hour in Louisville, as something ILA did as a thank to for the work we’ve done.

The rest of the committee was done in executive session, which is limited to committee members.  Right now the Legal Affairs Committee is starting, so I need to wrap this up and head over to that.

On My Way to Arlington

In a supreme act of Ubergeekitude, I’ve tethered my laptop to the iPhone and am posting this from the car.  Bitter is driving, obviously.  I’m hoping to make it there in time to attend the legislative policy committee meeting.  I’ll have more to report on later, but blogging will be a bit light today.

The PSH Has Returned

The Brady Blog has now returned to their regularly scheduled hysterics:

H.R. 6691 is a disaster of a bill, and the House should have the good sense to toss it in the trash, and its NRA sponsors out on their noses.

Except we’re still waiting for an explanation about how it does any of the things that Brady is falsely claiming it does.