Blast From the Past

Time lists this article as being from 2001, but it’s clearly not.  It’s from January 1990.  It talks about J. Warren Cassidy being Executive Vice President of NRA, who resigned in 1991, and was replaced by Wayne LaPierre.  Joe Foss is still NRA President.  The best date for the article is it references the 1989 Stockton Massacre as happening “a week ago last year”.

Read the whole thing.  It gives a snapshot in time of NRA, at a time when membership was declining, the inevitable passage of the Brady Bill and Assault Weapons Bans were on the horizon, and the future of NRA seemed more uncertain.  In those days, there was plenty of infighting between, I guess what we today would call the “pragmatic” faction of NRA, and the more hard line “Knoxers.”

The NRA of today has considerably less infighting in comparison to those days, but the political climate is much better.  That sounds crazy considering who controls Congress and who’s in the White House, but those were really dark days.  The media pointed to declining NRA membership as evidence of its losing support among mainstream gun owners.  The only people who suggest NRA is impotent now are the Brady Campaign, and my Governor.  I don’t think anyone really believes them.

Castle Doctrine Introduced

In the Pennsylvania Senate, by Senator Alloway.  I’m going to guess the Republican controlled Senate is an easier route of introduction.  Gets it to the House without having to wrangle through Democrat controlled committees.   Chances are we can pass this, but Rendell can always veto it, and probably will.  Still, it will force the issue, and make the Democratic nominee for governor, whoever that turns out to be, take a stand on that issue.  We probably already know that Corbett, who is the presumed GOP nominee, will support its passage.

Lautenberg’s Gun Show Language

The language is now available Thomas for Lautenberg’s gun show bill.  What’s interesting is that it doesn’t target private sales in general, but targets only gun shows.  In my opinion, it is intended to destroy gun shows, or at least seriously reduce their numbers, and frustrate being able to put them on.  Let’s take a look:

  1. A gun show, under this law, is defined as an event where more than 20% of vendors are selling firearms, where there are more than 10 people selling firearms, and when there are more than 50 firearms offered for sale.   This will probably cause flea markets and any place that’s not a licensed gun show to ban people from selling guns.
  2. Gun show promoters have to register with the attorney general according to regulations and fees defined by him.  They could make the fee 100,000 dollars.  The bill does not stipulate a fee.  This is entirely unacceptable.
  3. Anyone selling a gun at a gun show would have to show photo ID, be entered into a ledger, and be required to sign off on their requirements under this chapter.  This is true even if you’re just exhibiting a gun.  You don’t have to be selling it.  The promoter would keep the ledger, but would be required to keep it for as long as the attorney general stipulates.
  4. All transfers would be required to be transferred through a federally licensed dealer. It is a crime both on the transferors and transferees part for not doing so.  Federal Firearms Licensees will be required to enter details about the transaction into a bound book of some kind.  The bill also stipulates a separate form other than 4473, it seems. This new federal form will be reported to ATF.  They won’t require any identifying information about the transferees.  Multiple handgun purchase forms are required for these transactions.
  5. FFLs who transfer a firearm at a show will have to include a few transfer report form, separate from the current paperwork that records that a transfer has taken place.  What?
  6. Penalties go up to five years for doing a private transfer at a gun show, that goes for promoters who don’t do everything right too.
  7. Penalties of up to five years in prison are also added on to dealers who knowingly make a false record.

This law is aimed squarely at making gun shows so legally burdensome that no one in their right mind would organize one, and creating new criminal penalties for dealers who keep bad records. This must be absolutely opposed.  It looks like our opponents, rather than going for the whole private sale caboodle, have decided to specifically target gun shows.

Remember, in terms of organization, gun shows are for us what churches are to religious conservatives.  If they shut down gun shows, or make them entirely too legally burdensome to operate, they shut down a key locus of our ability to politically organize.  That’s exactly what the intent of this bill is.  Our opponents may be on the ropes, but they aren’t stupid.  It can’t be allowed to pass.

UPDATE: NRA offers its interpretation of this bill, saying it will do, among other things, make Camp Perry into a gun show.  This is not an unreasonable interpretation of the law.  Also:

If you are at home with a collection of fifty or more firearms, it would be a five-year felony to “offer” or “exchange” a single gun — even between family or friends — unless you first registered with the BATFE and paid a fee, the amount of which would be at BATFE’s discretion.

Checking back with the language of the bill, this is indeed the case.  There is no exception for homes.

UPDATE: More from NRA:

Even talking about a gun at an “event” could be seen as an “offer” to sell a gun. Even if you are not a dealer, but you display a gun at a gun show, and then months later sell the gun to someone you met at the show, you would be subject to the same requirements as if you had completed the sale at the gun show.

This is true.  It makes no distinction for venue.  If you make an offer to sell at any “event” or “gun show”, then later transfer them somewhere else, you’re still a felon.  Here’s the real zinger.  If you went to a “gun show” and offered to sell an SKS to your buddy while at the guns show, then a month later went to an FFL and did the transfer, with background check, 4473, and everything else, sorry, you’re still a felon, because you didn’t fill out the extra gun show transfer paperwork!

Folks, Frank Lautenberg has been in the Senate a long time.  He knows how to write legislation.  This is meant to put gun owners, where, in his mind, we belong — in federal prison.

How Much Gun Ownership in England and Wales?

The Guardian went through all the police records for England and Wales and put them in a spreadsheet.  Looks like there are about 129 thousand rifles, and about 549 thousand shotguns legally owned in those two countries.  That’s a very low level of gun ownership considering the combined population of England and Wales is 53 million.

You also see this in states that have licensng of gun owners, such as New Jersey and Massachusetts, which have very low levels of gun ownership by American standards.  Once you get that nose under the tent, it reduces our numbers, and thus reduces the constitutency willing to fight for more reasonable gun laws (reasonable by our standards, not theirs).

Try getting someone into shooting when it requires dealing with the police for months in order to get approved.  You can do it, but it becomes a lot harder.  We have one air gun shooter who’s been borrowing other people’s guns.  He’s from New Jersey.  To get one there, you have to go through the whole permitting process, including getting permission from the police first.  It takes months, fingerprints, and a lot of paperwork and hassle.

World Turned Upside Down

What does it means when you have an editorial in the US News and World Report that says gun control is unconstitutional, period, and the Baltimore Sun runs an article about the ineffectiveness of the gun control movement?

It’s part of American legend that when Corwallis’ men surrendered to Washington and LaFayette after the Battle of Yorktown, effectively ending the American Revolution, the band played “The World Turned Upside Down.”  Someone send Paul Helmke a fife.  If the media abandoned them, all is lost.  That’s not to say gun control is dead, but the current incarnation might be.  Will there be a rebirth?  Will Brady change their name again?  Who knows.  But pretty clearly what they are doing now isn’t working.

What Will NRA Do?

I was just tying up some loose ends with the Blog Bash this morning, and a thought occurred to me. This year’s banquet speaker was supposed to be Rush Limbaugh. Something in his schedule conflicted and he had to back out, but a note was sent to attendees that he promises to come to the 2010 banquet in North Carolina.

Only now, after he negotiated with NRA (presumably for a pricey speaking fee), Rush decided to become a shill for HSUS, an organization that vows to ban hunting and sponsors ballot initiatives to close down hunting seasons.

Now I suppose I have an interesting question for one of our sessions at the Blog Bash – will the staff who plan the NRA Annual Meeting for Charlotte continue to extend an invitation to (and pay) Rush to speak in light of his new support for HSUS? Will we give a stage to someone who is recording PSAs for an organization that seeks to end our hunting heritage if he does not apologize?

While I’m on the subject of pondering next year’s Annual Meeting, want to take bets on how many patriotic words NRA can fit into a banquet title? In 2007, I recall the event was simply called the National Rifle Association Annual Banquet. In 2008, it was the National Rifle Association Celebration of American Values Annual Banquet. In 2009, they have renamed it the National Rifle Association Celebration of American Values Freedom Experience Banquet.

If you can come up with a more patriotic sounding title using as many words as possible, I will submit it to NRA as a suggestion for the 2010 banquet. If there is sufficient interest and entertainment value, I’ll try to sweet talk Sebastian into awarding a prize for the best suggestion.

UPDATE: I forgot to add that another twist in the “WWNRAD” (What will NRA do?) saga is that they opted not to sign onto a letter with 28 other sportsmen’s groups asking Rush to stop supporting HSUS and their anti-hunting agenda. I will be sure to ask why they didn’t sign on to the group letter at the Bash, too. It’s quite curious considering they are usually part of these group efforts.

UPDATE: NSSF has posted the letter where you can see NRA did not join. (Before anyone asks, yes, they are on the list of groups notified when an effort like this is being organized.)

More on Self-Defense

Brillianter has two more good bits on handgun retention, and verbal commands.  Verbal commands is one area I never really worked on, and probably should if I’m going to carry a pistol for self-defense.  Despite the fact that I never shut up here, I’m not the most vocal person you could ever know in person.

Quote of the Day

From Clayton Cramer over on Volokh’s comment thread about the VPC deception:

I have this fantasy of a world where gun rights scholars get to work full-time at it, and gun control advocates have day jobs to slow them down.

I’m sure Clayton has even less free time than I do.  I say this still at work at close to eight because taking a day off on Tuesday to go to Harrisburg put me way behind at a critical time for our company.  I’m missing Silhouette tonight, which doesn’t make me happy.