No Palin

Looks like Sarah Palin isn’t going to be presented that AR-15 afterall, because she’s not going to be at the Annual Meeting:

The National Rifle Association Foundation will not present an assault weapon to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin at an upcoming banquet despite media reports about the event, including one from its own magazine.

“The event is not happening,” NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam said. “Sarah Palin will not be attending. She was invited, but declined due to a family commitment. This happened weeks ago.”

Several newspapers picked up a story published in the May issue of the NRA’s American Rifleman magazine that said the governor would be given a custom AR-15 at the foundation’s May 16 banquet.

That’s for letting the rest of us know guys!  I know last year a lot of folks wondered why NRA never presents black rifles, instead of a well appointed flintlock rifle.  This is a reason why.  Let’s hope that “family commitment” didn’t have anything to do with not wanting to endure yet another media feeding frenzy pointing out “Look at the backwards hick from Alaska getting herself a machine gun!”   We know it’s not true, but a lot of people don’t know any better, and politicians hate that kind of controversy.

Almost Right

I am sympathetic to this article, which points out the problem in Philadelphia has to do with abysmal enforcement gun laws against actual criminals.  This is true.  The cop killers in Philadelphia were let go without even being charged with gun crimes they were arrested for.

Despite what we endlessly hear – that guns have one purpose, to kill people – Judge Shreeves-Johns didn’t see it that way. She threw out the most serious charges, leaving Floyd with a mess of misdemeanors, but only a single second-degree felony count for gun possession.

Here’s a felon who shouldn’t have a gun in his hand under any circumstances, he’s on a public street, he fires three times, and gets 11 1/2 to 23 months, which is more like a time-out than a serious sentence. The judge also ordered anger-management treatment and drug and alcohol counseling for Floyd.

Is that enough?

No, it’s not.  I agree with this.  But here’s where you go to far:

That’s a mistake. If we’re serious about guns, that law must be expanded. If you use or carry a gun when committing a crime – shoplifting bras, writing graffiti, tipping over cows – you must get five years before the other offenses are added on.

No, sorry, I should not get five years because I was speeding while lawfully carrying a firearm.  People like Stu Bykofsky get what the real problem is, but they also need to get that there are lawful ways people can carry guns in this Commonwealth for the legitimate reason of self-defense.  I have no problem with enhanced sentencing for criminals who misuse guns to further a criminal act, like robbery, selling crack on the street corner, assault, or other violent acts.  But some kid in Lancaster shouldn’t get a five year felony rap because he tipped some cows with dad’s pistol in the glove box.  Let’s not get ridiculous here.  We can solve the actual problem without getting nuts.

What About Our Loopholes?

The other side is always complaining about “loopholes” in the law that are to us known by the moniker “liberty.”  Now it looks like Senator Enzi and Barrasso of Wyoming are both sponsoring a bill to close the National Park loophole.   Two can play at this game!

NRA Annual Meeting 2009 – Flying with Guns

I believe it was former NRA Executive Vice President, J. Warren Cassidy who said, “You would get a far better understanding if you approached us as if you were approaching one of the great religions of the world.”  The more you get to know the issue, the more you think the metaphor actually fits.  One aspect of NRA that takes on an almost religious nature is the Annual Meeting, which is in Phoenix this year.  We’re expecting 50,000 faithful to make the pilgrimage, something at every NRA member should do at least once their life.

This year, like last year, we have a bunch of bloggers who will be flying in from far away places.  Some of them wish to travel with guns.  I’ve done the TSA dance four times with firearms.  Once in Reno, once in St. Louis, and twice in Philadelphia, and not once have had an issue.

You’ll want to keep the pistol in a secured, hard sideed container, with ammunition kept in the original manufacturers packaging.  Different airlines have different rules, so check the rules for your airline ahead of time.  But most will accept ammunition in the same container as the pistol, provided it’s in the manufacturers packaging.

Since you’re likely to be traveling to the NRA Annual Meeting with a pistol rather than a rifle, it makes it easier.  Get a small, pistol sized hard gun case, that doesn’t advertise “GUN!” on the outside.  In fact, I would highly recommend Cabela’s “Bullet Proof” line of pistol cases.  They are expensive, but worth every penny.  You should use a non-TSA approved lock.  I use a combination lock so there’s no key to lose.  Make sure it has at least four wheels, or a dial combination, because three wheeled locks are easy to brute force.

Once you go up and declare a firearm, if you have a ticket agent who knows what they are doing, she’ll give you a card where you will declare to the airline that you do not have a loaded gun by signing the card.  The card goes in the pistol case.  This is your proof that you declared the firearm, so any subsequent law enforcement that comes upon your gun knows that you declared it legally.  Once that’s done, stuff it inside your regular luggage, and take it to the TSA counter (the ticket agent will tell you where, if they are any good) and have them run it through the x-ray machine.  They can inspect the chamber and magazine on the x-ray.  Carry a copy of this with you, and also the airline policy on travel with guns.

If you follow these guidelines, you shouldn’t have any trouble.  Flying with guns is easy, and I’ve never had a ticket agent that didn’t know what to do.  According to NRA, we’re good to carry at the convention center in Phoenix, with the exception venues for events which will be serving alcohol, where guns will not be permitted.  In fact, it’s illegal to carry firearms onto premises that serve alcohol in Arizona.

Specter Getting Ready to Flip on Card Check?

Brian Faughnan at Red State is reporting that Specter seems to be working out a deal on Card Check:

A spokesperson for Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), the lead sponsor of the Employee Free Choice Act, confirmed today that an agreement is near that will allow Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) to return to his earlier position of support for the legislation.

One wonders what else Specter is going to flip on?  Let’s hope he’s not talking to Kirsten Gillibrand too.

Good News in California

This has got to scare the Brady’s.  In their number one state for gun laws, the Assembly Appropriations Committee has suspended the ammunition registration bill:

Sponsored by Assembly Member Kevin De Leon (D-45), AB962 would make it a crime to privately transfer more than 50 rounds of ammunition per month, even between family and friends, unless you are registered as a “handgun ammunition vendor” in the Department of Justice’s database.  Ammunition retailers would have to be licensed and store ammunition in such a manner that it would be inaccessible to purchasers.  The bill would also require purchasers submit to fingerprinting, which would be submitted to the Department of Justice.  Lastly, mail order ammunition sales would be prohibited.

This doesn’t kill the bill completely, but it I’m guessing this is akin to tabling a bill in other states.

Via NRANews

Castle Doctrine Introduced

Senator Alloway has introduced the Castle Doctrine Bill into the Pennsylvania Senate.  It’ll have to make its way through the Judiciary Committee, and Stu Greenleaf is chair of that committee, who is rated B by NRA.  Hopefully he’s looking to improve his grade.  Looking at the makeup of the committee we have:

Majority (R)

Minority (D)

On a straight party line vote, it looks like we can get this out of committee pretty easily.  The question will be where Stu Greenleaf is going to stand on this bill, and whether he’ll want to bring it up.  But pretty clearly, we have a lot of highly rated Republicans on this committee that should be able to help us advance this bill.

It’s a pretty standard castle doctrine bill, all in all, except for a minor revision to the state’s law in regards to the definition of a loaded firearm:

If the magazine is inserted into a pouch, holder, holster or other protective device that provides for a complete and secure enclosure of the ammunition, then the pouch, holder, holster or other protective device shall be deemed to be a separate compartment.

That should clarify being able to carry pre-loaded mags to the range in the same range bag as your pistol.  As long as you put them in a secured holder of some kind, you won’t be considered loaded under the law.  That’s a nice fix.  Also contained is a provision preempting any “Commonwealth agency” from regulating lawful carry.

The Rank and File

A retired police firearms instructor from New Jersey takes issue with Jimmy Carter’s position on so-called “Assault Weapons.” But I thought law enforcement all supported this?  Far be it for me to call my governor a liar.

Absecon is in South Jersey, in Atlantic County.  It’s not Republican like Cape May and Ocean County, but you don’t get as much anti-gun hysterics when you drop below Monmouth County.  New Jersey is largely anti-gun because it borders New York City.

How is This Not Socialism?

I’m not one to use the hyperbole of calling ever Democratic politician to the left of Joe Lieberman a socialist, but can the folks who bitch to people on the right about calling Obama a socialist tell me how this isn’t socialism?  How about this? [Link removed, sorry] You have the government directing the means of protection.  That seems pretty socialist to me.

Countertop also asks the rather fantastic question of what happens if Obama decides to take a bit of Eliot Spitzer’s advice and put the squeeze on Cerberus, who own Chrysler, and a whole boatload of gun companies?  I have two words for Cerberus: Smith and Wesson.

Gun Blogger Invitational?

Caleb and Robb are looking into doing a Gun Blogger Invitational match:

The short version is that Robb and I are both fond of the blogger get togethers like The GBR and the 2ABlogBash, but we’d like to see a little bit more shooting at these gun blogger events. GBR has a range day, and the BlogBash has NRA’s air rifle range, but what if there was a match, say a “Gun Blogger Invitational” match that allowed you to hang and bang action pistol style with your fellow internet gun nuts?

My advice would be to make it within a day’s drive of most people.  Flying is a pain in the ass these days, and flying with guns means you have to check at least one bag (which they like to charge you for now).  But because some people do have to fly, make it in a city which you can get a direct flight to out of most major cities.  The Blog Bash is in Phoenix this year, which is actually harder to get to than one might think.  Most flights out of Philadelphia are indirect.  Getting to the GBR in Reno is real difficult from the East Coast; no direct flights, and not a wealth of available times of flights.  I love to drive, so a day’s drive away would be ideal for me attending.

Other than that, I would have a high degree of interest in such an event.  I don’t shoot IPSC or other action shooting sports competitively, mostly for lack of opportunity in this area, but I’ve always enjoyed doing it when I’ve tried it.