Get on Board GOP, Fast Eddie Needs Money

Ed Rendell has a message for Republicans:

Governor Rendell said he hoped Republicans wouldn’t oppose the stimulus bill in order to appeal their base:

“These are extraordinary times and it’s not the time to be redefining the party or staking out political ground. It’s time to rally around the needs of the country.”

Except that most of this bloated piece of crap is nothing but a Democratic Party wish list all crammed into one big steaming pile of debt we’ll leave to our kids.  But Ed needs money to pay his cronies he’s putting into high profile positions.  Otherwise, he might have to lay off state workers.  This is clearly no time for the GOP to act like an opposition party!

“Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste”

The Republicans need to oppose this stimulus like their futures depend on it, because quite honestly, it does.  This stimulus plan is no such thing, and it has to be stopped.  Truth is, it really can’t be stopped, but Republicans have to make a good showing of it if they want to stand for something.  This is the time to put Bush behind us.

Layoffs at Federal During the Great Obama Gun Rush?

I have to share SayUncle’s puzzlement over Federal Cartridge letting some workers idle.  I bought TD’s FAL not too long ago, and have yet to shoot it because I can’t find anyone who will sell me .308 at a reasonable price (other than the steel jacketed crap I can’t shoot at my club), and I’ve checked a few places online, and a gun show.  I say they need to hire those folks back and get loading.

Skeptical of Stimulus

Megan McArdle is skeptical the stimulus proposed by Congress is going to do much, and pretty much represents an excuse to push multiple Democratic spending priorities:

Though you wouldn’t think it from the really quite shocking incivility emanating from the pro-stimulus side, the empirical evidence that this works in a large industrial economy like ours is basically nonexistant.  The problem is, we have very, very few examples to test on:  America during the Great Depression, and Japan in the 1990s.  And neither America nor Japan managed to stimulate their way out of their troubles.

Meanwhile, it looks like Boehner is getting the GOP to start acting like Republicans again.

Catch and Release in DC

Women tries to rob a police officer of his gun (stupid move number one), pulls the trigger, gun goes click.  Police end up arresting her, find drugs.  Charged with assaulting a police officer, and carrying without a license.  What does this person get as a sentence?  Three years supervised release.

I should note that Fred asks why she wasn’t charged with attempted murder.  The answer is probably the same Mens Rea thing we talked about a few days ago.  Attempted murder requires proving intent, whereas assault on a police officer, which is a felony carrying a maximum penalty of 10 years under DC Code, is easier case to prosecute.  Of course, it could also be that it was part of her plea deal, to avoid having to take the case to court in the first place, that she would plead guilty to assault on an officer.  Assault on an officer in the DC Code is the same penalty as assault with a deadly weapon, or what would be aggrevated assault in other jurisdictions.

Stepping Up When It Counts

It’s pretty clear that the media is not going to let Gillibrand’s support of gun rights go away right now.  Given that, it’s important that gun owners step up and support her.

One poll already shows that 26% of New Yorkers would be less likely to vote for her because of her pro-gun positions, whereas only 16% would be more likely to vote for her.  Fortunately, 41% said they didn’t care.  We need to show her that it matters.  Those 16% need to show up and/or open their wallets.  There’s no way that 26% will show up for the competition on any other day than Election Day.  So let’s show Gillibrand that there is no loss to being pro-gun.  That with an active 16%, we can easily top their 26%.

  • First step: Whether you live in New York or not, sign up for her email list.  One, this gives her a strong metric to use against opponents.  In the age of the internet, especially after Obama, Paul, and Dean, how many people are on you mailing list now matters.
  • Second step: Regardless of where you live, give if you can.  She’s already got the Senate campaign started, so we can start giving.  Show her the money so that Dems are turned off to a primary challenge and Republicans feel she’s a tough opponent.
  • Third step: If you live in or near New York, volunteer.  There won’t be much to do at this point, but things will start to pick up later this year.  Go ahead and get on the list now to be another metric they can use to scare off the competition.

There are other things you can do like become a supporter of her Facebook page.  It’s not as strong as getting on her email list, but it’s public, and they can get an idea of what their supporters are interested in.

One of the biggest risks I see for gun owners could easily be caused by our own inaction.  Right now, the media is leaning on her, expecting her to change her positions.  Other Dems are saying that now that she reprents the entire state, she needs to turn against guns.  Because of this, I suspect many gun owners are going to convince themselves to take a “let’s wait and see” approach to getting involved.  If we do that, we shoot ourselves in the foot.  Get on board, show her we care and that we’ll support her, and she will be far less likely to give a damn about those anti-gun voters.  If we can help her reach out to independents and finance her ability to reach out to Dems on other issues, then we will keep a pro-gun vote in the Senate.

She is going to need a lot of money.  She’s only got about $250,000 cash on hand.  She’s considered to be a great fundraiser, but a Senate race in New York is not cheap.  She will need millions heading into next year.

More Media Heat for Kirsten Gillibrand

From the Albany Times-Union.  There is definitely a concerted effort among the New York State media establishment to shame Gillibrand out of her support for gun rights.  This puts her in a difficult position.  I would encourage everyone in New York, especially Republicans, to send their new Senator a note of support, expressing their appreciation for her support of the Second Amendment.  The only thing that’s going to help her stand up to the media onslaught is support from her constituents.

I think that Senator Gillibrand will find that more New Yorkers are closer to Tom King’s view on her than they are to possible GOP challenger Peter King’s.

Barrasso is a No

Wyoming Senator John Barrasso is saying he’ll vote no on Holder.   The reason?

As Wyoming’s United States Senator, I take very seriously the responsibility to protect and defend our right to keep and bear arms. President Obama has every right to nominate Eric Holder to be Attorney General. I have the duty to closely review the nominee’s qualifications and philosophy on issues that are important to all Americans.

Thank you Senator.

Inflation and Deflation

I’m not as panicked as Kevin, SayUncle, and PDB about the vast expansion of the money supply.  While I would not sell myself as any economic expert, the risk in inflation the money supply is, well, inflation.  But my understanding is that the reason to do this is to prevent giving rise to a much worse beast, which is deflation.  We’re already experiencing deflation in a lot of sectors, like Housing, which was the match that lit this fire.

If this recession is fundamentally a problem of people over-borrowing, and business being over leveraged, and falling asset prices, one easy way out of the problem is to inflate your way out of it.  The problem with deflation is that it gives people an incentive to hoard money.  Not to spend, or invest it, but just to sit on it, because it’ll be worth more tomorrow than it is right now.  That’s very damaging to the economy.

Inflation is painful to people who have saved, which isn’t many of us these days.  Too much inflation is indeed a bad thing, but if the problem is too much debt, and declining asset prices, an inflationary cycle would actually help alleviate the problem.  Unfortunately, runaway inflation is also a big problem, and stopping it can be highly painful.  I suspect this massive expansion in the money supply is going to have detrimental effects at some point, as the fed will have to tighten the spigot to deal with inflationary pressures.  That’s going to suck, but I suspect it will suck a lot less than the consequences of deflation.  Given that, I’ll worry about what effect a rapid expansion in the money supply is going to have when it comes time to cross that bridge.  The really scary part to me is, everyone, even expert economists, seem to be playing this by ear.  No one seems to really understand what’s going to get us out of this.