Libertarianism was something I flirted with in college and in my early post college life. I decided it wasn’t a political movement, so much as a religion, and it’s why walked away from it. I’m not interested in being pure, I’m interested in being an advocate for causes that I think enhance personal freedom and limited government meddling in private affairs, and advancing those causes politically.  Libertarians, in my experience, are not interested in seriously advancing their ideas politically, because to do so, you have to build a “tent” that’s big enough and comfortable enough for enough people to get under to win. Libertarians, in my experience, tend to spend more time about arguing over whether someone belongs in the tent than they do trying to grow it.
I would consider Megan McArdle a fellow traveler, and someone who belongs in our tent of people interested in promoting liberty. But Megan McArdle has spent a lot of time lately criticizing Ron Paul, and recently suggested that Ron Paul’s demise is good for libertarianism. Read the comments. If you want to know why I can’t abide by “movement” libertarians anymore, read her comments.  I’ll pick out some choice ones:
Don’t think that we will forget this treasoness behaviour. What you do now will be with you for ever more. ‘When the time comes Megan,… when the time comes’.
And yes, that is a thinly veiled threat.
As the ‘Revolution’ grows, You have no idea.
I guess it doesn’t matter how many dissidents they have to put down in the name of liberty.
I am an anarchist and to me a statist, even a minarchist, is much worse than a racist.
Because a rule by the strong over the weak is guaranteed to have positive outcome for individual freedoms!
I don’t think we did lose big in NH. If you look at the towns that just didn’t count Paul’s votes and consider the lop-sided contridictions of the electronic vote versus the hand re-count … Obama probably beat Hillary and Paul probably took 3rd or 4th.
It’s a conspiracy! I point this out not to poke fun at anyone but as a warning, because we have folks in the gun rights movement who also think this way, and who would place our movement far outside the mainstream. Gun rights must be a large tent as well, and we also have folks who are interested in driving the insufficiently pure out of the movement. Once we become that, it’s over. The last thing we want the gun rights movement to look like is the Libertarian Party.