Injunction Granted

A judge has blocked the City of Philadelphia from enforcing its gun control ordinances:

Common Pleas Judge Jane Cutler Greenspan is granting the National Rifle Association’s request Thursday to keep the ordinances from taking effect right away. The NRA argues that Pennsylvania law prevents municipalities from regulating guns.

So, the question is, how far do you want to push this Mayor Nutter and Commissioner Ramsey?  Do we want to risk contempt of court charges in addition to civil rights violations?  Still want to enforce your laws?

Defeat for Gun Control in IL

The RKBA movement is becoming extremely effective at keeping Daley and Blagowhatshisname’s agenda at bay.  Maybe they’ll soon be able to start reversing losses, and we can hit them with a combined strategy of litigation post-Heller, and grass roots action.  Armed and Safe told us yesterday that Daley would make his move on the anniversary of Virginia Tech (this date is a refuge of scoundrels everywhere it seems).  Well, it would appear Daley has gone down in flames.

Illinois is a good example of how effective we can be when NRA and its state affilate work together and are effective together.  It’s a pity Pennsylvania’s state Rifle and Pistol Assocation are mostly useless politically.

More on Wal-Mart

Bitter points out a pretty interesting back story to the whole Wal-Mart Bloomberg affair.  Seems that the firearms industry, and even some Wal-Mart executives were caught off guard by this.  I’ve thought for a while that Wal-Mart would like to be out of the firearms business, now it seems they might want to be out of the fishing business too.  All the more reason, I think, to go elsewhere for my outdoor needs.

Closing the Gun Show Loophole

This issue will be what the antis push the hardest in the future, because I think it’s the one goal they have that is probably most politically achievable.  But that’s not to say it’s going to be easy:

“Gun control is not an issue that any of these candidates wants to bring up right now,” Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute told ABC News the other day. “For the candidates, it’s a lose-lose.”

No, it’s not.  There is no serious grass roots movement in this country for gun control.  They can bring money to the table, they can bring media, but they can’t bring the most important thing; votes.  I did not point out this thread on the HuffPo about Obama’s endorsement by AHSA.  I wanted a chance to see how many gun control advocates actually turned out.  The answer was, not many.  Plenty of Obama and Democrat ra-ras, many of which were eagar to assure that Obama wouldn’t take away anyone’s guns, but very few people actually advocating for restrictions.  And this is a site full of the exact demographic who should be most in favor of restricting guns.  Where’s the passion?  If it wasn’t for the anti-gun groups hold on the media, no one would pay attention to them.  No one.  But back to the article:

“There are people who think engaging on this gun-show loophole is too much of a hot-button issue,” Clifford said. “I would suggest that the fact that the Baltimore Police Department seized almost 4,000 illegal guns last year shows it is a critical law-enforcement issue.”

And exactly how many of those guns traced back to gun shows?  I’m going to suggest that Sterling Clifford has absolutely no idea.  We can win on this one.  We can deliver passion, and we can deliver votes.  All they can deliver is lies and propaganda.

Blast from the Past

Anyone who knows Philadelphia City Paper knows it’s about as close to Worker’s World Daily as you can get without being Worker’s World Daily.  This article from eight years ago, other than some minor details, it could have been written today.  It highlights Project Exile, which has morphed into Project Safe Neighborhoods.  It’s not a program, from a principle standpoint, I was ever comfortable with, since it implies that all federal gun control is constitutional, and that all violations should be death with severely.  As applied to violent criminals, I have little problem, but as applied to someone who, say, puts too many foreign parts in his rifle, well, let’s not get crazy.  I don’t trust federal prosecutors to always make that distinction.

But Project Exile’s value was demonstrating to the public that more gun laws were not needed, which has done a lot to stop the clarion call for more gun control every time crimes or mass shootings attract a lot of media attention.  It was important for the public to understand that there were a) already a lot of gun control laws on the books and that b) they weren’t being enforced rigorously.  For City Paper to have covered this issue in a balanced and positive manner, as did many other typically anti-gun media outlets at the time, was a public relations coup.  What is achievable in terms of gun rights is mostly limited by public opinion, most of whom believe in a right to own a gun, but who are also willing to accept some restrictions.  Much of the population, with no familiarity at all with firearms, their capabilities and limitations, would accept more restrictions than you or I would.  The “enforce the laws we already have” meme has been a powerful one, and it’s one that resonates with much of the public who are on the fence.  It’s both sincere, in the sense that most of us agree with locking up violent criminals, and a tactic.  It does not preclude us from working to improve the existing laws to be less infringing of the rights of honest gun owners.

One Blogger’s Response from Wal-Mart

Over at Firearms and Freedom, Wal-Mart responds.  I still haven’t gotten anything yet.  If I get the same thing, I’ll let everyone know.  I find that response to be wholly inadequate, and while I understand Wal-Mart’s desire to be a “responsible retailer” they were already doing that by following the relevant state and federal regulations in regards to firearm sales.  This is not about being a responsible retailer.  If you want my guess, it’s about opening stores in New York City.  Wal-Mart is free as a business to decide these are reasonable steps, and I’m free as a consumer to shop elsewhere, which I will do.

New York Alert

Looks like gun owners in the Empire State are about to get screwed royally.  I guess Assembly members were upset that California and New Jersey got a higher Brady rank than they did.  Look at the margins by which these things pass.  Scary stuff.

Target Not So Friendly Either?

In the comments, TheGunGeek writes:

Target has been anti-gun and anti-hunting for as long as I can remember. They contribute heavily to some anti-hunting organizations. If you want to support a store that is still pretty good on the gun front, I’d suggest Ace Hardware for the things they carry. Most of the Ace stores I know actually have a sporting goods and gun section.

Good to know.  I actually do most of my shopping at the local Giant.  Rarely to I venture to Target or even to Wal-Mart, except when I was looking for some cheap ammunition.  There are a lot of corporations that give money to anti-gun, anti-hunting causes.  It’s tough to boycott them all.  A key thing is awareness.  Not many people realize the Humane Society of the United States is a radical anti-hunting group.  When people hear Humane Society, they think kittens and puppies, and everyone loves kittens and puppies, right?  We have very savvy opponents.

UPDATE: I went digging to find whether these accusations could be sourced, and I’m having a hard time.  Target’s charitable partnerships are listed here.  I suppose some of those groups on there might indirectly support gun control, but I don’t see any anti-gun or anti-hunting groups on that list.  Target foundation grant recipients are listed here.  Still can’t find anything that would be controversial for us.  Here’s what they do say about community grants:

TARGET DOES NOT MAKE GRANTS TO:

  • Individuals
  • Programs located outside Target communities
  • Educational institutions for regular instructional programs
  • Religious organizations for religious purposes
  • Treatment programs such as substance or alcohol abuse
  • Athletic teams or events
  • Fundraiser or gala events
  • Advocacy or research groups
  • Capital or building construction projects
  • Endowment campaigns

So unless someone can find an instance of them making grants to anti-gun or anti-hunting advocacy groups, I’m inclined to suggest that Target isn’t doing it.

Duquesne Gun Control Symposium Report

Word is in on the conference held a few weeks ago from Alan Korwin, who attended as a participant representing the pro-gun side.  Read the whole thing.  At the end we’re told that James Brady didn’t appear because Sarah Brady fell critically ill with pneumonia.  I know Sarah Brady battled lung cancer several years ago, but I had heard it was in remission.  Having lost a mother to cancer, I’m well aware of its consequences and the effects of the treatments, even after they have stopped.  It’s not a fate I wish on anyone, and I do hope Mrs. Brady recovers from her pneumonia quickly.