Category: Gun Rights

I would like to wholeheartedly thank the City of San Francisco for making such a large and generous donation to the National Rifle Association, and other gun rights groups.  This is most certainly a welcome development in the history of the gun rights movement, and we look forward to donations from other stellar, first class cities such as Chicago, Alameda, and New York City sometime in the not to distant future.

These funds are certainly important to continued advancement of this important civil right, and we are grateful to the City of San Francisco for helping us out.

Problem is probably not the right word, but I mean to talk about what makes organizing gun owners a lot like herding cats, and makes a lot of the traditional types of activism the left uses ineffective when applied to gun owners.

In my experience, the overwhelming sentiment among gun people is this: “Leave me alone!”  I don’t care how you cut your activism, for most people, that pretty much what it boils down to.  Many of us would pay little attention to politics if it wasn’t for the understanding that there are a lot of politicians out there who would take every last gun and cartridge out of our closet if given half the chance.

For a bunch of cantankerous individualists, we’ve actually done pretty well.  I would argue far better than most left wing groups have been able to do.  The left are out to make their mark on the world — to mold it, to perfect it, and to eliminate its sins.  Purging perceived evils from the world is far more emotionally satisfying than “leave me alone,” and the types of people who are out to change the world are more likely to be emotionally rewarded through collective action.  For us, the “leave me alone” strain is as likely to make our rank and file get as annoyed with activists as they do with politicians.  Most would rather hit the woods, raise families, shoot matches, ply their trades, tinker, read a book, or do any number of things rather than spend a nice spring day in some (often far away) city known as D.C. (which they’ve heard really sucks anyway).

But even if our folks could be convinced to join protests, is it really effective?  For all the hewing and hawing about the Iraq war, it seems we’re going wrap that job up rather than leaving the embassy on the last helicopter out.  For all the near riots that surround any meeting of the IMF, World Bank, or WTO, those institutions don’t appear poised to disappear or recede quietly into the sunset.  Did protests end the Vietnam war?  Or was it bringing the war into people’s living rooms every night?

Gun owners could do better, but I don’t think we’ll do better by adopting the most ineffective tactics of the left, and methods where we start out at a disadvantage due to the psychological makeup of most of our people.  Let the left stick to trying to change the world.  We need to stick to methods that will work for organizing cantankerous individualists.  I’m not convinced that’s protests.

SayUncle asks what could go wrong with a million gun owner march rally.  The main that will likely go wrong is you get, if you’re really lucky, a thousand or so to show up.  Even in this lousy economy, most gun owners have a job, and have families, which means they have better things to do than to attend protests.

PA gun rights groups organize a rally every spring in Harrisburg, and if it get enough people to fill the Capitol Rotunda, it’s a good turn out.  Now the rally would really be more aptly called a lobby day, where people come and lobby legislators in groups of concerned citizens.  So we’re talking something more than a protest really.

I am not very sanguine about the prospects of protests being an effective tool of pro-gun activism.  To be honest, I don’t even think it’s a remarkably effective tool for the left, even though they tend to generate better turnout and media attention since their causes tend to energize young people who have more free time and are willing to take greater risks.  But it’s because protests tend to bring out the worst in people, and the media pays the most attention to the worst protests have to offer, that I don’t think they are an effective tool for promoting gun rights, or really any cause.

Far better activism would include writing Members of Congress, meeting with your Congressman, writing letters to the editor of the local paper when they run anti-gun editorials or articles, volunteering for pro-gun politicians, and building relationships with local cubs, ranges and gun owners.  Now, if we could get a million people involved in doing that, we’d really have something.

West Mifflin Township has decided to give up its plans to install metal detectors at the entrance to council chambers.  I actually don’t think this needs to be a violation of preemption per-se, as long as you wave people past who are carrying firearms legally.  But presumably that was not the intent here.

Some folks seem to think that the excise taxes we pay on guns and ammunition ought to go things other than range development and wildlife conservation.

Word is that the bill to regulate all sales at gun shows in Virginia has been defeated for a second time in the Virginia Senate.  This is useful for everyone, because passage of this bill in Virginia might have given legs to a national effort to do the same.

UPDATE: It occurs to me that I should say “further regulate” because it’s not like there’s any such thing as an unregulated gun sale these days.

The Veterans Hertiage Firearms Act, which authorizes a limited amesty for registering NFA items for veterans who served from 1934 to 1968, has been reintroduced by Congressman Rehberg of Montana.   Baby steps.

Dave Workman has an interesting take on Congressman Rush’s bill in Illinois, which requires a written test as a precondition of licensing:

From the late 1890s through the mid-1960s, African-American citizens in the Deep South were systematically and egregiously denied their voting rights through the administration of so-called “literacy tests.”

It took an act of Congress and some Supreme Court rulings to abolish this despicable form of bigotry. But apparently history is lost on Congressman Bobby L. Rush, who represents the 1st District of Illinois.

Astonishingly, this black congressman has introduced a gun control measure that would, among other things, require potential gun owners to first apply for a firearm license and before that license would be issued, they would have to present “a certificate attesting to the completion . . . of a written firearms examination.”

If he were proposing this for voting he’d be banished from town.  I guess in Congressman Rush’s world, some rights are more equal than others.