Right on Cue With the Sotomayor Confirmation

The Brady’s are touting their latest victory over the big bad National Rifle Association because she was confirmed 68-31.  Even the Washington Post is saying not so fast.  NRA has been pushing pretty hard, and exploring the edge of the envelope.  Defeating a Presidents nominee is extraordinarily difficult, and this result should not be surprising.  But you will see many in the media attempt to play up NRA’s weakness here, and try to make the case for the gun control movement.

You had nine Republican Senators defect and vote for her.  The nine were Vionovich (OH), Graham (SC), Alexander (TN), Gregg (NH), Bond (MO), Snowe (ME), Collins (ME), Lugar (IN), and Martinez (FL).

Here’s the situation as I see it.  Previously we had a choice between lousy not lousy when it came to gun rights.  The Democrats were lousy, and the Republicans were just enough not lousy to keep us voting for them.  After suffering defeat after defeat, and at risk of becoming a regional party, the Democrats decided to run pro-gun candidates in conservative districts in order to rebuild their majority.  The gambit worked!  Now Republicans have to be very concerned that Democrats are threatning the loyalty of what has been a very significant voting bloc for them.  NRA has 4 million members, and some 13 million, I believe, who have been members and are sympathetic.  Additionally, I think I recall there being 33 million people who think they are members of the NRA.  That’s nothing to sneeze at in politics.

So what we have before us in an opportunity to whip the Republicans a bit, and let them show us that they can out pro-gun the Democrats.  I think the Thune amendment was part of that.  I also think the Sotomayor vote is too.  Nine defections certainly sucks, but 31 Republicans still voted against her confirmation.  That’s 31 Republicans who just showed us they can out pro-gun the Democrats.  Despite the loss, this puts us in a very good position.  A lot of those pro-gun Dems will know they need to work to make it up to us for their vote on Sotomayor.  Guys like Tester, Webb, Pryor, Begich, and the other pro-gun Dems know they are not going to win re-election or easily win re-election without NRA support.  In essence, we may be in a position now where the pro-gun elements of each party, which are a majority of both houses of Congress, try to out do the other.  It’s far from the reality the Brady’s are touting, and far from what you’ll see in media outlets.  I honestly don’t think NRA’s power has ever been stronger, and we’re very very lucky that’s the case.

Serious Reaching

The Democrats in New Jersey are desperate to hang the albatross of being a “right wing extremist” around the neck of Chris Christie.  One of the chief ways this is often accomplished in New Jersey is by trying to tie a candidate to the NRA.  In the Garden State, there’s no greater example of right wing-nuttery than the National Rifle Association, or so the Democrats think.

A few days ago I noticed in the New York Times, an article attempting to paint Christie with that moniker.  You see, NRA donates money to the Republican Governors Association, some $90,000 since December.  The Republican Governors Association has donated $3 million dollars to a one Christopher J. Christie.  So clearly Chris Christie is in the pocket of the NRA!   I would have been willing to ignore this as blatant and obvious crap, except the same meme appeared today in the Philadelphia Inquirer, in an article about Corzine’s signing of the one-gun-a-month fiasco in New Jersey.

NRA hasn’t donated money to Chris Christie’s campaign because Christie is not really aligned with us on a lot of key issues.  Sure, he’s better than Corzine.  By a mile.  But that’s not saying a whole lot.  The goal in November for New Jersey gun owners is getting a governor who will stop treating gun owners as punching bags.  Once you can breathe a little, it might give some time to work on legislators, like getting rid of Fred “One-Gun-a-Month” Madden.

Keep Digging Joe. Keep Digging.

Joe Sestak apparently doesn’t want to face the fact that Pennsylvania tends to like its Democrats pro-gun, except in the City if Philadelphia and the townships and boroughs that immediately ring the city limits.  Otherwise Joe Sestak wouldn’t be publically calling for an Assault Weapons Ban renewal:

“This recent incident recommits us to reinstitute the assault weapons ban originally instituted in 1994. I have continuously pushed for this ban to be reinstituted since I came to Congress in 2007, including just last year when I cosponsored The Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Act.

Part of me almost wants Sestak to win his primary, so we can finally be rid of Arlen.  I also think that Sestak is easier to beat in a statewide race.  But then again, we tried that strategy with Obama, and it didn’t turn out so well.  Either way, however, I think Sestak is making a mistake running on this issue in Pennsylvania.  Even Fast Eddie played down his anti-gun bona fides big time when he ran for Governor.  Sestak is digging his own political grave if he runs with this issue out on his sleeve.  It might win him some votes in Philadelphia, but it hurts him in most of the rest of the state.

Mexico to Push for US Gun Control

Plans for the North American Leaders summit:

Mexico also wants more gun control in the U.S., particularly when it comes to assault weapons.

“I would like to see the assault weapons ban reinstated – it’s not philosophical, it’s because of what we have seen on the ground…There is a direct correlation between the assault ban and expiring in 2004 and the numbers – simply the sheer numbers – of assault weapons that we seize in Mexico…We are both cognizant of what can and cannot be done right now – we will softly, diplomatically…continue to say that this is an important issue for us but I think the real perspectives of this moving on Capitol Hill these days are slim to say the least,” the official said.

““The Mexican government is not about challenging the Second Amendment.  That’s a sovereign decision of the United States.  It’s a sovereign decision of the U.S. Congress.  That’s up to you guys. But the Second Amendment wasn’t adopted by the Founding Fathers to allow transnational organized crime to illicitly buy weapons in the Unites States and be illicitly cross them over international borders into countries where those calibers and types of weapons are prohibited,” the official said.

So they expect me to believe that because in 1994 we banned flash hiders and bayonet lugs, that Mexican drug cartels just couldn’t abide by dealing with post-ban features, and went without.  You know, if the people pushing these issues weren’t so dishonest, our jobs would be a lot harder.  Trust me, the last thing Mexican officials want is for us to actually listen to them.  As long as they can blame the United States for their inability to control their own border, and control their own crime and corruption, they don’t need to answer for their own failing.  They blame our gun laws for the same reason New Jersey and New York blame the gun laws in the rest of the country; to pass the buck.  The alternative is admitting to your own people that your policies are a failure, and no politician will ever do that.

Even More Crazy

Tam covers a one Nancy Genovese, who was caught scouting out a FEMA camp with some guns in her trunk.  She covers the “wookie-suiter” far better than I would, so go read.  There seems to be a lot more of this lately, and I’m wondering why.  Perhaps it’s settling in just how long 3 1/4 more years really are going to be.  Or maybe it’s the Glenn Beck mind control dirigibles that have been circling around the skies, hidden by cloaking technology developed in Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity’s secret technology lab.

Time to Short Whole Foods

The CEO of Whole Foods is apparently operating under the delusion that his company’s business model involved making people healthy.  In that vein, he says his company sells “a bunch of junk.” and is vowing to help his customers eat healthier.

He went on to say that Whole Foods was going to launch a healthy eating education initiative to encourage customers and employees to reduce obesity.

But Mackey told the Wall Street Journal: “Basically, we used to think it was enough just to sell healthy food, but we know it is not enough. We sell all kinds of candy. We sell a bunch of junk.”

Mackey, dude.  I don’t know if anyone’s told you this, but at the end of the day, you sell food.  That’s your business.  If you’re encouraging people to eat less of it, unless you can turn up the margins, something that’s going to be tough in this economy, you’re screwing your shareholders.  Whole Foods has a simple business model: selling overpriced food to people who care about Mother Gaia, and who think an overworked Filipino adolescent driving a pair of oxen around a rice patty are all the farming technology the world needs.

Whole Foods provides somewhere to go to buy food so they can feel good about themselves.   That’s what you’re selling, Mack.  You’re selling a dream to hippies, and at a much higher profit margin than your typical supermarket.  If those folks come to Whole Foods, and feel good about themselves when they buy a box of organic, fair trade ho-hos, that’s a win win situation.  You win, because you just sold an overpriced box of ho-hos, and the consumer wins, because they can feel good knowing they are buying the best product subsistence farming has to offer.  It’s what capitalism is all about!

Whole Foods needs to ditch the true believer, and hire someone who’s more interested in making money for their shareholders.  I have no CEO experience, but I understand what Whole Foods sells, so I offer my services.  I would never shop at a Whole Foods store myself, but I know plenty of folks who do, and they have money to burn.  I’ll keep selling them the dream, and promise to cry for Mother Gaia all the way to the bank, and print your dividend checks on 100% recycled, organic bleach free paper.  Wouldn’t want any of our shareholders feeling bad about themselves, now would I?