Ron Paul beat John McCain to come in second in Montana, with 25% of the vote. I’m hearing his campaign thinks they have a chance at winning Alaska.
Mitt took Montana with 38%. It seems to be that the farther Romney gets away from Massachusetts and the Northeast, where we’re all very aware of the fact that he has no soul, the better he does.
But back to Ron Paul. His performance in Montana would indicate he has a chance of taking Alaska, but if I were to place a beer bet, I’m betting McCain takes Alaska. What’s all this mean? It definitely tells me is that the free state project folks picked the wrong state to try to move to. They picked New Hampshire, when clearly Montana would be the better choice.
I actually hope all the folks who put a lot of energy, money and enthusiasm into the Paul campaign don’t get disillusioned and drop out of the process. I am optimistic that more liberty oriented ideas can resonate with the general public, if fronted by a candidate who can carry the message. Elections are popularity contests, and are only peripherally about ideas and policy. We need a candidate who can win in that kind of environment, and that isn’t, and wasn’t really ever going to be Ron Paul.