Gun Show Promoter Backs McCain

It’s looking like McCain is trying to woo some of the gun vote back, and has landed Florida gun show promoter Victor Bean’s endorsement:

Senator McCain will sign on to a national right-to-carry bill if Congress brings it to his desk. As far as he is concerned, the gun show loophole is a moot point, and he will appoint judges who follow the Constitution.

Perhaps it’s because I’m not a Floridian, but this is the first I’ve heard of Victor Bean.  I do have to wonder what makes McCain think the gun show issue is now a “moot point”?

PSH From Omaha

This article is filled with so many problems, it would take me all night to fisk it:

The assault guns could be gaining popularity because they are relatively inexpensive and easy to find, Fidone said.

AK-47s are priced online for as low as $400. Other types of rifles cost hundreds or even thousands of dollars more.

That’s just one example of some of the blatant ignorance you’ll find in this poorly researched farce. It’s it funny, though, how all these articles seem to all follow the exact same pattern? Curious indeed.

A Tale of Two Reactions

Paul Helmke’s reaction to the DOJ brief was apparently different from Dennis Henigan’s.  With Bush establishing a middle ground a lot closer to where the Brady Campaign would like it to be, it makes it easier for Henigan to move the ball closer to Brady’s goal.

Liveblogging the State of the Union

9:05 – Blah blah blah. Lots of greeting. On HDTV you get to see exactly how old some of our elected leaders really are.

9:07 – Obama and Kennedy are sitting with each other. I guess they are best buddies now. Just don’t let Ted drive home.

9:11 – Off the bat with a message of unity. Democrats and Republicans working together. I prefer when they bicker personally.

9:12 – Now it’s the economy, stupid. Bush is touting the agreement reached on the stimulus plan which will accomplish exactly nothing in terms of helping the economy.

9:14 – Lower taxes, I like lower taxes.

9:16 – Bush talks a tough talk on spending and earmarks. If he had done that two years ago maybe Republicans would still have their majority.

9:19 – Bush wants to make private health coverage deductible. I think this is a good idea to put private coverage on par with employer group coverage. The Democrats don’t seem to stand up and applause for choice and freedom from government control of health care. Kind of tells you how they think doesn’t it?

9:20 – Blah blah blah…. Education. What ever happened to abolishing the Department of Education, back when Republicans were cool? Last I checked my copy of the constitution, it doesn’t grant power to Congress to regulate education.

9:23 – We do need to pass free trade agreements. That should get more applause than it did. I worry free trade is going out of style.

9:25 – Apparently Bush’s copy of the constitution has something about the federal government being responsible for people’s jobs in it. I must have a copy that’s missing some things.

9:26 – Energy policy is probably the biggest snake oil selling going on these days. Clean coal and nuclear are at least real energy sources. Notably absent is ethanol and hydrogen. Good.

9:28 – I should note that I was never a fan of the Republican stem cell research provision, but I think it’s odd that the Democrats didn’t stand and applause for advancement of research that makes adult stem cells possible to use. Seems to me that’s a good thing no matter what you think about the issue.

9:30 – Confirm judges. I agree.

9:32 – Now it’s time for entitlements and immigration. I agree with Bush on entitlements. Bush touts his guest worker program again, which I support, provided we don’t offer amnesty for people who are already here unlawfully. Bush implied he was still on board with amnesty. This is a political mistake.

9:35 – Now it’s time for talking about terrorist killing. It doesn’t seem to get the applause it used to, sadly.

9:39 – Onto Iraq. The Surge. Our soldiers are doing great work. Yay! The surge is working. Democrats silent. Republicans applause.

9:45 – When it comes to supporting soldiers, Democrats seem to applause vigorously. When it comes to specifics on supporting their mission, silence.

9:47 – Everyone likes troops coming home. Democrats don’t like having basing withdraw on the recommendations of commanders and progress on the mission.

9:51 – Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace. I’ll believe it when I see it.

9:53 – Bush send a warning to Iran. I’d prefer to send missiles, but this is why I’m not president.

9:55 – The Democrats don’t like warrantless surveillance. I don’t either.

9:57 – America apparently is number one in fighting famine, which is why we are busy driving food prices through the roof by turning food into motor fuel. The best anti-hunger initiative the US could undertake would be to end agricultural subsidies and stop using corn ethanol for fuel. But you won’t hear anyone suggest that.

10:01 – Lots of flowery language about “We the People”, and The Union being strong. Bush is actually pretty good on his delivery tonight.

All in all, a pretty boring and uneventful state of the union. Looks like I picked the wrong week to not drunk blog this, it would have made it a lot less dry.

UPDATE: E-gads!  Sibelius is awful.  If she’s a “rising star,” as the Fox pundits said, maybe I should be more optimistic about the future of the Republican Party.  She sounds and looks like she’s been lobotomized.

The Role of Judicial Reivew

If you have some time to read, over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin and Orin Kerr have been debating the proper role of judicial review in our republic.  It’s well worth a read.

I tend to side with Professor Somin in this instance.  The idea of legitimacy through “consent of the governed” has always struck me as problematic, because I think the purpose of government, first and foremost, has to be the mutual protection of rights.  A “consent of the governed” legitimacy model surmises that the democratic process offers any meaningful consent.  I did not consent to have John McCain and Russ Feingold limit my rights to speak out against them in any meaningful way, yet all three branches of the federal government have upheld this, despite the fact that I believe the majority of people would recognize it was a violation of freedom of speech if it were explained to them in detail.

I do think the judiciary needs to be true to the original meaning of the law, and not impose wild and inconsistent theories about legal interpretation.  I want to understand the biases and philosophies of the judges we put onto the bench, because I don’t think there’s any theory of legal interpretation that will act as a bulwark against personal bias that will still preserve the court’s role as a check against the other two branches of government.  The judiciary needs to have an active in here, and ought not make a presumption that those branches will enact constitutional laws.  I think conservatives need to beware in restraining the judiciary, they don’t go so far as to make it a gaggle of “yes” men.

This is How You Protest Government

They get an A for creativity and style:

A Pennsylvania couple angry at the noise from airliners flying overhead has expressed their anger by painting an obscene message on the roof of their home.The two-metre-tall sign is directed at the Federal Aviation Administration, which recently altered the plane routes around Philadelphia International Airport.

I grew up in the town next door.  Folsom is where my high school was.  Noise from air traffic was always there, but it must be pretty bad now with the new traffic patterns, particularly since UPS likes to fly out fully loaded 747s in the middle of the night.

Pennsylvania Open Carry Blog

Activists have been taking up the issue of open carry here in The Keystone State.  Now there’s a blog dedicated to it by a fellow Bucks County resident.  I’ve never been big on open carry personally, but I’ve seen what activists in Virginia have been able to accomplish, and it’s defied my expectations.   It’s not as uncommon in Virginia as it used to be, and “the law” is pretty much aware that it’s legal now.  I’ve only ever seen open carry in Pennsylvania twice, once on a bus in Harrisburg, and once on the Appalachian Trail.