Liquor Control Always Gets Their (Wo)man

Looks like Megan McArdle has had a run in with Pennsylvania’s puritannical Liquor Police in her past.  The continuing existence of the LCB has always been a curiosity to me.  I’ve never met anyone who likes the system, yet it persists. LCB has their own set of agents who are charged with enforcing Pennsylvania’s byzantine laws regulating alcoholic beverages.

Megan went to school just across the street from me, at about the same time too.  LCB agents love staking out University City drinkeries, becuase let me tell you, there’s no problem facing the City of Philadelphia that’s more serious than 19 and 20 year olds having a beer with their friends.  You might get mugged on the way back to your apartment, but we’ll spare no expense and trouble to make sure you don’t dare risk “uncontrollable vomiting”

On the other side of the coin, I’ve never heard of LCB agents breaking down anyone’s door and shooting their dogs.  So maybe by modern law enforcement standards, I shouldn’t complain.

Confederates in the Attic

Clayton Cramer reviews a book by Tony Horowitz “Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War.”   Sounds like a very interesting book, and Clayton’s review is sure to generate some discussion.

From there, Horwitz explores a darker, more worrisome side of “Confederate” America–people who are still nursing grudges about the Civil War–and making excuses for the Confederacy. If I hadn’t met more than a few people like this over the years, I would find myself wondering Horwitz was exaggerating. But I’m afraid that he isn’t.

I’ve also heard a number of folks point out that the Civil War wasn’t about slavery, so it is a fairly widespread belief.  But I think the resurgence in these types of beliefs can also be linked back to my post from last week on the lack of dignity and respect afforded southern culture by elites driving a lot of resentment.

For the record, I think slavery is America’s original sin, and the institution was a stain on all America, not just on The South.  But we’ve put it behind us, and I think it’s time to move on.

John Edwards to Attend Beijing Olympics

At the rate John Edwards has been digging, he’s sure to make it before the closing ceremonies.   Bitter points out why John Edwards doesn’t know when to just shut the hell up.  Over at Volokh, Jim Lindgren points out that Edwards says he was 99% telling the truth when he lied.  I expect next he’ll try to tell us that the reason he cheated was because his cancer ridden wife is just too sick to take care of his manly needs.

Considering what John Edwards has said about this whole affair, I would remove all kitchen knives and blunt objects from the Edwards’ house.  You have to figure, she doesn’t exactly have much to lose.  I don’t know if, at this point, to many people would blame her.

Well, At Least We’re Not Detroit

I might complain about Mayor Nutter, but at least he’s not this guy.  Nutter I think is often misguided, but I don’t think he’s a crook.  That’s certainly an improvement over Philadelphia’s last Commander-in-Cheat.  Definitely an improvement over Detroit.  You know things are bad when even Philadelphians are saying “Damn, I’m glad I don’t live there!”

Driving Extremism

If one looks back at history, one of the primary drivers of the American Revolution was not taxes, it wasn’t Parliament, or a seething hatred of the crown.  Those were just manifestations of a deeper problem.  I think if you had to pick a fundamental, underlying reason why Americans separated from Great Britain, it would have to be that the colonies suffered from a deficit of dignity.  There was an impression, even among elites in the colonies, that the cream of British society looked down on them from on high, and did not consider them to be equals.  No matter how successful someone might have become in the colonies, to the folks back home, they would always be colonials — second class Englishmen.  Once elites felt the indignity along with the common man, the seeds of the separation had been sown.

I bring this up, because there is the beginnings of a dignity deficit beginning to appear in some segments of American culture.  I’m not suggesting we’re on the road to another revolution, though some seem to believe that, but I think we’re seeing symptoms of a problem that can lead to Very Bad ThingsTM if left to fester.  The American left, for all their pretensions of caring about the Bill of Rights, civil liberties and freedoms, and the plight of the common man, has largely given up on them in practice.  They care about civil liberties to the extent that they can use them as a political club to beat their opponents over the head with.  They care about every day people to the extent that it helps them cement their power.  Since the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s, you haven’t really heard much philosophy coming from the left in terms of what our rights and freedoms ought to be.

This is important, because liberty and freedom are values we should all agree on as Americans.  Sure, we can argue over whether the general welfare clause allows Congress to establish “free” health care for everybody.  We can argue over what to do about Social Security’s looming insolvency.  We can argue over gay marriage, abortion, and all the other issues people love to bicker about.  But there are some things that as Americans, we should all find outrageous, but it’s a sad fact that we don’t.

The media is perhaps the worst of the bunch when it comes to standing up for justice and liberty, and holding the powerful accountable.  Sure, they are willing to do it when it involves topics the left disapproves of, but they tend to ignore a lot of Americans’ deeply established and held values.  If this wasn’t the case, no one would pay attention to Rush Limbaugh.  This is what contributes to a deficit of dignity — when the elite in politics and the media ignore and trivialize entire segments of society, those people start believing their concerns don’t matter.  That’s not just wrong, it’s dangerous if taken to extremes.

Where’s the outrage in the media about the fact that a man was sent to prison for clearing brush out of a temporary waterway?  We might all want clean water, but talk about unintended consequences.  Why don’t you see stuff like this in the New York Times and Washington Post, where, especially, people who make these policies and laws can see the consequences of them, taken to extremes.  Why is the left not outraged at repeated stories like this, and beginning to question why police are using more and more military style tactics when dealing with enforcing victimless crimes?  Why did it take the NRA and SAF, and not the ACLU, to hold Nagin and Riley’s feet to the fire after they unlawfully confiscated firearms from elderly women in the lawless aftermath of Katrina, leaving them utterly defenseless.  Hell, why isn’t the media and ACLU demanding that Nagin and Riley be thrown in jail?  Has there been outrage among elites that Fenty has openly defied the spirit of the Heller ruling?  Or is the sentiment more “Go Fenty!  Screw those gun nuts!”  Regardless of how you feel about Randy Weaver, or the Branch Davidians, can anyone on the left make a reasoned argument as to exactly why Lon Horiuchi should not be in prison right now?  Can they explain why no one went to jail for mudering dozens of children in Waco?

These aren’t merely concerns of madmen.  They are real questions that people have asked, but because their viewpoints aren’t represented among the elite, no one acts like they care.  It’s quite possible no one among the elite does care.  Having ones concerns and grievances marginalized is a great driver of political resentment, and while I don’t think too many people are ready to start a revolt over this, its what feeds a lot of the angry people who hurl invectives at those of us who suggest that they still have faith in the process.  Given that the popular attitude among elites is to mock and dismiss them, as the Brady Campaign suggested I should do yesterday, is it any wonder they are pissed off?  Something they ought to think about.

English First

Eugene Volokh takes Larry Pratt’s other venture, English First, to task for berating Tyson foods for accomodating its Muslim workers by offering certain Muslim holidays off:

Not all religious beliefs, of course, have been accommodated, and not all should be accommodated. But requests from minority religious groups (including recent immigrant groups) for accommodation are a longstanding and respectable part of the American tradition of religious freedom. Where religious pluralism goes, multiculturalism is indeed a traditional American value. And the union vote at the Tyson plan is not “multiculturalism run amok” — it’s the American tradition of religious tolerance and religious accommodation working as it should be.

Amen.

Cuccinelli for Virginia Attorney General

Bitter outlines the reasons Cuccinelli’s opponent is slime.  AG is usually a good stepping stone to the Governor’s Mansion, and Cuccinelli would certainly be a good governor for Virginia gun owners.

Thoughts on Political Change

I said earlier in the day that if people really want to change the government, they can do it.  But it’s funny how dealing with an infestation of slimy politicians is a lot like dealing with lice.  We noticed the lice infestation in 1994, got some Kewll out, and applied it liberally.  For sure, we got rid of a lot of lice, but we forgot to rinse and repeat.  We need to get voters angry enough that they’ll not only throw the bastards out, but keep throwing them out until things change.  It takes multiple treatments to get rid of lice, and probably the same for politicians.

People know things need to change.  Polls show that Americans are very deeply displeased with their government, and for good reason.  Obama comes in and says that he’s the change we need.  Polls show people are skeptical of that.  Not skeptical enough for my comfort, but he’s not blowing away McCain.  At the root of the problem, is a population that’s largely disengaged itself from politics, and doesn’t really understand the source of their displeasure — they just know that things now pretty much suck. That should be rich soil in which to plant some seeds from the tree of liberty, but so far, it hasn’t been working.  The media is to blame for a lot of that, but based on my experience with the libertarian movement and in the gun movement, a lot of that blame lies with us.

Libertarians, particularly, are often more concerned about weeding out heretics than they are about building a movement.  It was a long and painful journey to arrive at that conclusion, but eventually I had to admit that Libertarians were spending too much time and energy arguing about what it means to be one, rather than trying to alter the political landscape to bring it closer to their terms.

It’s probably in our nature, because we are independent minded folks, to abhor collective action, but collective action is required in order to affect lasting political change.  You have to get out there and advocate for your point of view with people who might only vaguely agree with you.  You have to select a course of action that gets you closer to your goal, and build allies to get you there.  You may not like all of your fellow travelers.  Let me offer an example of it in the gun rights movement.

In my position against my Congressman, I’m pressing the fact that the bill he signed on to, HR1022, would essentially ban semi-automatic shotguns.  I focus on that because a lot of people own semi-automatic shotguns.  In fact, a lot of those people who own semi-automatic shotguns, wouldn’t care much for my AR-15, and might not think too poorly of a politician who advocated banning it.  But I focus the message on the shotgunners, because my only concern is that gun owners go into the voting booth and say “I’m not voting for Patrick Murphy, because he wants to ban my shotgun.”  The AR-15 guy will understand a Congressman coming after semi-auto shotguns will ban his AR-15 in a heartbeat.  If I can help defeat Murphy, and replace him with a real friend of gun owners, I don’t really care whether half the guys that helped me do it think the same way Jim Zumbo does.  In fact, it might just make that shotgunner think “Well, if they are going to label my shotgun an ‘assault weapon’ where’s it going to stop.”  Jim Zumbo was eventually persuaded too.

In affecting political change, I think it helps to have a big picture in mind, but you must choose your battles wisely.  No two battles will present you with the same set of allies.  That’s why I’m an advocate for not shutting people out of the movement for being insufficiently pure.  When it comes to grounding the movement, philosophy is very important, and we need philosophers.  But winning in politics requires making friends, so we also need to do that too.

Campaign Finance Laws

So Bitter and I have some flyers we’ve made up, that we were looking to distribute. The one obstacle is that I’m not sure whether I’d be running afoul of campaign finance laws by doing so.  If you believe you live in a free country, where it’s perfectly lawful to use any electioneering speech you damned please to help defeat your Congressman, and replace him with someone who you feel will represent you better, you would be mistaken.  A quick perusal of federal campaign finance statutes will remove any notion of that very quickly.  This is not a system that’s designed to encourage participation of an active and engaged citizenry.  It’s a system designed to leave electioneering to professionals.  This is not a way to encourage a healthy Republic.  The sad part is, I think the people in power know this, and don’t care.  It helps them.

I’m pretty sure our fliers, which we would be distributing as private citizens, do not run afoul of finance regulations.  But you know, I’m not sure.  The fact that I signed up to be an Election Volunteer Coordinator with the NRA might complicate things.  I shouldn’t have to hire a lawyer to tell me whether or not I have free speech.  I am very tempted to put in lettering, underneath:

This Message was Approved by James Madison

It’s going to be very hard pulling the lever in the fall for that bastard McCain, who foisted much of this nonsense on us.  The only reason I can even begin to get by it, is because he had a lot of help in crafting this turd stew.  The recipe of this disaster might have brewed in McCain’s head, but it was Bush that added the corn, and Supreme Court that added the peanuts.  Mmm mmm.  It’s election year 2008, and we’re all going to have to take a big bite!

Quote of the Day

From Glenn Reynolds on the 2008 Bejing Olympics:

I won’t be going, and I don’t plan to watch. The Olympics are a fount of corruption and chicanery anyway, upholding no ideals and promoting no good ends anyway. Plus, they’re boring.

I won’t be watching either.  Even the shooting events.  What the Chinese government is doing is a disgrace.  The only thing more disgraceful is the IOC’s capitulation.  China should not be permitted to host another Olympics until it cleans up its human rights record.  What’s next?  Havana Olympics?