A Failure to Discuss?

This is the pot calling the kettle black.  Bryan Miller says we fail to discuss issues.  This is the pot calling the kettle black.  I will prove him wrong by attempting to engage in reasoned discourse.  I’m sure it will be quickly followed by Reasoned DiscourseTM:

All can agree it is the responsibility of the legislature and administration to mediate between individual privilege and the common good. In this case, the common good is public safety and mediation has resulted in a moderate limit on handgun purchases, to diminish handgun trafficking.

Yes, but we’re not talking about individual privilege.  We’re speaking of a constitutional right.  A right Bryan.  Get used to saying it, because it’s law now.  A right.  Now that we are speaking about the right terms, can you explain to me what other constitutional rights we ration?  If I want to pick up three pistols, one for home, and one for me to carry and for my wife to carry, can you explain why I have to wait three months to do this?   Or have one gun for my primary residence, and one for my beach house, why I have to wait two months to make the purchase?  Remember, it’s a right.  You don’t get to argue I don’t need a gun to defend myself.  The Supreme Court already ruled that out.

The law regulates purchases of handguns only. It in no way affects purchases of long guns, such as hunting rifles and shotguns. Since it is illegal to hunt with handguns in NJ, the law does not affect hunting at all.

It’s illegal to hunt with a handgun in New Jersey, but it is not illegal to hunt with handguns in many other states, and New Jersey hunters may want to avail themselves of hunting opportunities in other states.  But that aside, this isn’t, and never has been about hunting.

While it is true a majority of crime guns recovered in NJ are traced back to states with weaker gun laws, ATF data shows that more than a quarter of recovered crime guns were originally purchased from in-state gun dealers. This is a substantial portion of guns used in crime, which this law is intended to reduce.

Originally purchased how long ago on average?  How many were stolen, rather than purchased?  How many were purchased through multiple purchases?  You don’t know this.

ATF data has also shown that several NJ gun dealers have had both “frequent multiple sales to individuals” and “multiple crime guns traced” to them, indicators of likely trafficking originating at gun stores, according to ATF.

Considering how few dealers are left in New Jersey, I wouldn’t be surprised of many New Jersey gun dealers have frequent multiple gun sales, and frequent trace requests.  That doesn’t mean that the multiple sales are ending on the black market, and I doubt you have any proof of this.

This law contravenes no one’s Constitutional rights. The US Supreme Court stated, in last year’s Heller ruling, that individuals have a Second Amendment right to possess handguns in homes for self-protection, but that said ruling “should not be taken to cast doubt on…laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms,” a clear endorsement of NJ’s ability to regulate handgun purchases.

It’s simplistic to argue that any condition or qualification on a commercial sale is constitutional.  If that is the case, what’s to prevent a state from creating a qualification that only people who have incomes above 80,000 a year and good credit ratings may purchase a firearm?  If you want to argue it’s constitutional, that’s one thing, but you’ll find nothing in Heller that states that rationing this right is among the types of “conditions and qualifications” the court is speaking to.  Someone that has two residences, and suddenly find themselves under a credible threat might feel different about not being able to buy more than one firearm a month.  Did Heller not speak for them?

Sorry Bryan, but we’re willing to have a coversation.  You’re just not willing to listen to what we have to say.  There was a time when you didn’t have to.  Very soon that’s going to change, when your buddy Corzine is sent packing.  You better get used to addressing us as fellow citizens with a reasonable point of view.  The times are a changin’.

Animal Rights Crusaders Taking Philadelphia Pets?

This is a very troubling account of a Philadelphia animal rights group swiping pets and refusing to work with breed experts who want to adopt them.  In a very quick search, I didn’t find any media accounts to back it up, but I’m sure that’s because on its face, a story about a woman with a few too many dogs doesn’t sound that interesting.  So instead I received verification from Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.  Then it gets interesting…

The local SPCA raided Wendy’s Willard’s kennel where she keeps her Murder Hollow Bassets on Monday night. They arrived with seven trucks and two police cars & informed her that one of her neighbours had complained about noise.Neither the neighbour nor the SPCA had previously complained to her, yet she has been there for 22 years.

As it turns out, Philadelphia County had recently passed an ordinance where no more than 12 animals may be kept on any property. The Murder Hollow kennels contained 23 bassets, less than the requirement to obtain a (US) Department of Agriculture kennel licence, but the kennel is just inside the city limits.

Under this law, the local SPCA have managed to acquire the power to seize people’s dogs without warning, by force and by night, and then to take them away to an unknown destination without any accountability.

The police took 12 hounds and delivered them to an SPCA animal rescue “shelter” in Philadelphia. From there the hounds were dispersed amongst other “shelters”.

When I contacted the SPCA, they claimed that other blog coverage (and this is the only other blog coverage I’ve found) is inaccurate.  I didn’t dive into exact raid details with their spokeswoman, but I’m curious about what exactly is inaccurate.  She did not challenge or attempt to correct my understanding that the dogs were seized in response to a relatively new Philadelphia ordinance without warning or an effort to cooperate with the owner.  (A quick search for information on this seems to verify that there was little or no media coverage of this change, prompting reasonable concerns that a full on raid may not have been the best way to address a concern of too many dogs.)

According to the blog post, basset owners from around the area have stepped up to care for the dogs, but have so far been refused.  Why would a shelter that has an “urgent appeal” out for adoption homes ignore offers of assistance from breed specialists?  So, I inquired about this rather odd development.  Again, it was confirmed that these other owners have been contacting the PSPCA, but to no avail.  The PSPCA claims that they have already sent the dogs out to a rescue shelter, and the operators of the rescue shelter maintain full discretion over who may see or adopt the dogs.

At this point, I’m more than a curious writer, but a concerned citizen.  Why can a private organization come on to your property to enforce an ordinance, take your property, and then not be held accountable for the property?  How can a rescue organization hold full determination over adoption rights for pets when even PSPCA admits they have not fully investigated the situation and alleged violations? Continue reading “Animal Rights Crusaders Taking Philadelphia Pets?”

Serious Reaching

The Democrats in New Jersey are desperate to hang the albatross of being a “right wing extremist” around the neck of Chris Christie.  One of the chief ways this is often accomplished in New Jersey is by trying to tie a candidate to the NRA.  In the Garden State, there’s no greater example of right wing-nuttery than the National Rifle Association, or so the Democrats think.

A few days ago I noticed in the New York Times, an article attempting to paint Christie with that moniker.  You see, NRA donates money to the Republican Governors Association, some $90,000 since December.  The Republican Governors Association has donated $3 million dollars to a one Christopher J. Christie.  So clearly Chris Christie is in the pocket of the NRA!   I would have been willing to ignore this as blatant and obvious crap, except the same meme appeared today in the Philadelphia Inquirer, in an article about Corzine’s signing of the one-gun-a-month fiasco in New Jersey.

NRA hasn’t donated money to Chris Christie’s campaign because Christie is not really aligned with us on a lot of key issues.  Sure, he’s better than Corzine.  By a mile.  But that’s not saying a whole lot.  The goal in November for New Jersey gun owners is getting a governor who will stop treating gun owners as punching bags.  Once you can breathe a little, it might give some time to work on legislators, like getting rid of Fred “One-Gun-a-Month” Madden.

Keep Digging Joe. Keep Digging.

Joe Sestak apparently doesn’t want to face the fact that Pennsylvania tends to like its Democrats pro-gun, except in the City if Philadelphia and the townships and boroughs that immediately ring the city limits.  Otherwise Joe Sestak wouldn’t be publically calling for an Assault Weapons Ban renewal:

“This recent incident recommits us to reinstitute the assault weapons ban originally instituted in 1994. I have continuously pushed for this ban to be reinstituted since I came to Congress in 2007, including just last year when I cosponsored The Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Act.

Part of me almost wants Sestak to win his primary, so we can finally be rid of Arlen.  I also think that Sestak is easier to beat in a statewide race.  But then again, we tried that strategy with Obama, and it didn’t turn out so well.  Either way, however, I think Sestak is making a mistake running on this issue in Pennsylvania.  Even Fast Eddie played down his anti-gun bona fides big time when he ran for Governor.  Sestak is digging his own political grave if he runs with this issue out on his sleeve.  It might win him some votes in Philadelphia, but it hurts him in most of the rest of the state.

Even More Crazy

Tam covers a one Nancy Genovese, who was caught scouting out a FEMA camp with some guns in her trunk.  She covers the “wookie-suiter” far better than I would, so go read.  There seems to be a lot more of this lately, and I’m wondering why.  Perhaps it’s settling in just how long 3 1/4 more years really are going to be.  Or maybe it’s the Glenn Beck mind control dirigibles that have been circling around the skies, hidden by cloaking technology developed in Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity’s secret technology lab.

Drop the Squirrel! Drop it Now!

In another overuse of SWAT team incident, in Milwaukee they use one to take down a squirrel shooter.  They wouldn’t comment on the type of gun used, but did find three dead squirrels in the yard as evidence.  My money is on the gun in question being an air gun, or you can bet the police would have mentioned it.  The people of Milwaukee can sleep safely tonight, or at least the squirrels can.

Manufacturing

Obama claims that grassroots efforts against his health care program are “manufactured,” but grassroots organizing in favor are democracy trying to stop mob rule.  As Jim Geraghty of Campaign Spot said on his twitter feed, “Claims of ‘manufactured’ outrage — in this economy, it’s a pleasant surprise to see anyone manufacturing anything.”   Bravo.