Specter Loses Senority

The Senate, last night, voted to strip Arlen Specter of his senority in the Senate:

In announcing his move across the aisle last week, Specter asserted that Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) had assured him he would retain his seniority in the Senate and on the five committees on which he serves. Specter’s tenure ranked him ahead of all but seven Democrats.

I guess Harry Reid’s word is about as good as Obama’s.

Instead, though, on a voice vote last night, the Senate approved a resolution that made Specter the most junior Democrat on four committees for the remainder of this Congress. (He will rank second from last on the fifth, the Special Committee on Aging.)

Ouch, that’s gotta hurt.  Apparently Specter had designs on heading the Appropriations Committee, and this reduction in seniority is going to make it very difficult to pork up the budget.  I hear a very tiny violin playing softly in the background.

Pigeon Shooting Bans Introduced

Looks like there are two bills going forward in the Pennsylvania General Assembly, House Bill 1411 and Senate Bill 843.  Both have identical language.  NRA is asking folks to contact the committee heads here for the Senate, and here for the House, in opposition.

The good news is that the bills are pretty narrowly defined, such that they ought not to affect legitimate hunting and dog training activity.  The bad news is, it’ll make it harder to defeat.  I have no love of pigeon shooting, but I do not wish to see it banned, and embolden HSUS, who is behind the ban.  If they win, they will be back with more money (which they have plenty of) to push for more restrictions on hunting.

Consider how they used this issue in Michigan, and you’ll see what I mean.  Dove Hunting, which is legitimate hunting, with hunters eating their catch (I know a few dove hunters myself) was banned by referendum there, because HSUS was able to smear it as a not legitimate hunting activity.  Also remember that HSUS supports a comprehensive ban on lead ammunition.

Every legislative victory will bring them more money and more power.  This will be an awful pandoras box we’ll be opening, if we allow HSUS to achieve an easy victory in Pennsylvania,.  Let’s not make this easy for them.

Gambling: It’s for the Children

From Capitol Ideas:

Speaking from Summerdale, Cumberland County, yesterday, Rendell urged the young’uns to mount a Children’s Crusade by signing an online petition supporting the legalization of tens of thousands of video poker terminals to raise roughly $500 million for higher education grants.

Read the whole thing.  I’m wholly in agreement with Rendell on the liberalization of the state’s gambling laws, but I think it’s odd to employ children in the promotion of it.  Lame duck Ed is a lot more interesting than needs to win an election Ed.  I will say that.  Perhaps next Rendell can tell kids to convince their parents to drink more in order to bring in even more money the state can use for education.

A Tale of Two Statements

A few weeks ago, in regards to Harrisburg’s recently passed Lost and Stolen ordinance, Linda Thompson, Harrisburg Council president stated to our favorite Inquirer columnist, Monica Yant Kinney:

Thompson doesn’t believe a lost-and-stolen law will halt gun trafficking, but it’s a worthy first step.

On Monday, responding to an NRA lawsuit against Harrisburg’s ordinance, she stated:

“I’m not threatened by the NRA,” said City Council President Linda Thompson. “I want the NRA to know I support our law-abiding gun owners, but they’ve got to get off the special interest state of mind. This is about human interest.”

How, in that instance, is the Lost and Stolen law not a “special interest?”  She freely admits it will not stop illegal gun trafficking.  So who does she presume it will affect?  If you guessed the law abiding, you would be correct.  Who is behind this rash of ordinances breaking out all over the Commonwealth?  If you guessed CeaseFire PA, you would be correct.  Does CeaseFire PA escape “special interest” status, or are the a “human interest?”

You see, it’s already a crime to transfer a handgun in this Commonwealth without processing through an FFL or the police.  But we’re told now that even lowering the state’s burden down to that isn’t good enough.  Now we want to be able to throw people in jail because the state thinks (but can’t prove) they are liars, when they inform the police they had a gun stolen.  And opposing that, according to Councilwoman Thompson is a “special interest,” rather than a “human interest.”  Forgive me if I don’t get the distinction.

New Jersey Dead Last in NICS Stats

Cemetery is reporting that New Jersey is dead last in NICS checks.  Sales there are still up by over 30%, but with one of the lowest rates of (legal) gun ownership in the country, New Jersey’s just not a big enough slice of the pie to compete with other states.  Pennsylvania is selling an order of magnitude more guns per person.  Onerous restrictions in NJ are also going to put a lid on demand.  Many folks who have applied for permit to purchases or FIDs after Novermber 4th are no doubt still waiting for them, and will wait for more than a year in many cases.  This despite the fact that the law calls for a 90 30 day issuance.  Obeying the gun laws over there is mandatory for the citizen, with multi-year mandatory jail sentences for forgetting some obscure detail, but optional for the police.   All in the name of public safety, you know.

Specter Way Ahead of Toomey in Polling

Capitol Ideas is reporting that Specter beats Pat Toomey 53-33 percent in the general, but Tom Ridge matches up with Specter at 46 percent and Ridge at 43 percent.  Like I’ve said before, incumbents have a sky high reelection rate, which is why it makes sense for NRA to endorse Specter if he holds his position on the Second Amendment and keeps voting that way.

As much as I would like to see Pat Toomey off Sarlen Arlen in the 2010 election, it’s not likely to happen.  I think Toomey could improve his polling numbers if he plays his politics right for Pennsylvania, but if Ridge throws his hat into the primary, he’s going to have to run to the right of Ridge (how’s that for alliteration?).  I think Toomey’s fortunes depend on him avoiding a rough primary, and even if he manages that, he has an uphill fight.

Of course, it’s not out of the question that Specter will face a stiff primary challenge from the left as well, so I’d be hard pressed to suggest this race is over before it starts.  Time will tell.

How Well do the Lost-and-Stolen Laws Work?

In a run up to a memorial event for fallen police officers, reporters watching Harrisburg are waiting to see if Fast Eddie decides to use his speech to honor the officers or use their deaths to push for his gun ban agenda. But in an interesting side note to one of the articles pondering Rendell’s plans, the columnist actually inquired as to the success of Philadelphia’s last gun control stunt – lost-and-stolen reporting.

Philadelphia’s nine month-old lost-and-stolen law, for example, remains under legal appeal that could take another year or two.

Everett Gillison, deputy mayor for public safety, tells me that while 152 guns have been reported lost or stolen since the city law took effect in July, not one has been recovered. Not one.

Not a single result has come from their illegal law that flies in the face of state preemption.

Who’s Better on Civil Rights Again?

Jacob Sullum talks about the great expansion of federal hate crime that Congress is considering.  This bill makes federal crimes out of most crimes, enabling double jeopardy.   The problem is that, under our federal system, the federal and state governments are considered separate sovereigns, and so while double jeopardy is generally prohibited, because each sovereign is considered to have its own, separate interest in prosecuting crime.

It’s a nice idea in theory, and it might even work out if Congress were truly limited to its enumerated powers.  But Congress’ power over interstate commerce are now without limit.  With this new hate crime law, a person could easily be acquitted by a jury in state court, and then brought to trial in federal court for the same act, under this “hate crime” law.  The nexus to interstate commerce?  Well, he used a gun see.  And that gun once traveled over state lines.  Lopez was supposed to deal with this problem, but who knows if that’s even still valid precedent, even if it might technically still be.