Category: Guns
Article on Scalia in the New York Times
It includes some criticism he’s gotten from Heller:
As it happens, it’s not only some Democrats who view Scalia as a constitutional hypocrite: many prominent independent and Republican judges and scholars have also criticized him for ignoring the original understanding of the Constitution in the cases he cares most passionately about. As Biskupic points out, Judge Richard Posner has derided Scalia’s constitutional history in the gun case as “faux originalism,†and Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson has compared Scalia’s gun opinion to Roe v. Wade for its refusal to defer to the political branches.
Posner’s knowledge of the scholarship that has surrounded the Second Amendment recently leaves much to be desired, and one wonders whether Harvie Wilkinson has read the Congressional briefs in Heller and McDonald, where a substantial majority of the “political branches” came down in favor of an individual rights view of the Second Amendment. Unless by “political branches” Judge Wilkinson means DC City Council, the City of New York and the City of Chicago? Maybe the reason Scalia hasn’t responded to these critics because their arguments are so shallow as to not be worth responding to?
The Big Debate: Godwin?
Joe summarizes a debate that’s happened within the community that I’ve been following but haven’t joined in. Joanna I think makes some good points too. Partly because I don’t fall cleanly on one side or another. It can’t be denied that a very significant motivation for gun control is a form of cultural condescension, and a any bit of discussion on the Internets quickly reveals that many people have a prejudiced view of the kind of people gun owners are, and associate gun ownership with certain cultural stereotypes. It might not be racism, or anti-semitism, but it’s a similar form of intolerance nonetheless, and that should be pointed out. But in doing that, I do think we need to be careful about what we compare ourselves to. Not everyone who believes in gun control has a bigoted view of gun ownership, and not every discussion of gun owners is necessarily driven by cultural prejudice.
But Joe is fundamentally correct that the cultural condescension can’t go unchecked, or it’ll grow, and it is often useful to point out how it’s not that different from other forms of intolerance. But more often that not, I think the prescription for that is for people to learn that reality doesn’t match the stereotypes they have in their head, which means they have to learn they have gun owners and shooters in their social circles. One of the reasons I think cities like New York and Chicago have become such wonderful breeding grounds for these attitudes is it’s highly unlikely political and cultural elites will have gun owners within their circles of friends. This is a product of the legal environment in these places, which hopefully we can change soon.
Gun Free School Zones
Joe reminds us of a poor way in which the law was drafted, that exempts having a gun within 1000 feet of a school if you have a license from the state the school is in, but doesn’t in other circumstances. It is therefore possible to be charged with violating the federal gun free schools act if you carry on a reciprocal out of state permit.
The Gun Free School Zones Act was held unconstitutional once, but Congress rewrote it. It’s likely it wouldn’t stand up again if challenged. But it is worth noting.
Pennsylvania Leaders Involved in McDonald
Over at PAGunRights.com, I take a look at the leaders in Pennsylvania who stepped up to sign on to at least one brief in favor of the petitioners. You can read excerpts from all of the relevant briefs over there, but here are the names of those who deserve our thanks for being proactive on the issue:
- Atty. Gen. Tom Corbett
- Sen. Joe Scarnati
- Rep. Karen Boback
- Rep. Michele Brooks
- Rep. Bryan Cutler
- Rep. Bill DeWeese
- Rep. Glen Grell
- Rep. Rob Kauffman
- Rep. Mark Keller
- Rep. John Maher
- Rep. Daryl Metcalfe
- Rep. Merle Phillips
- Rep. Kathy Rapp
- Rep. RoseMarie Swanger
- Rep. Will Tallman
- Rep. Katie True
It would have been nice if more Pennsylvania lawmakers had stepped up to be on the right side of history in this case. As I understand it, there were time constraints in some states.
Maybe we should use this against lawmakers anyway. As gun owners we could tell them that since most of them did not help out on McDonald, they could make it up to us by passing Castle Doctrine. :)
Bloomberg Sworn in to Third Term
Article II Lives!
SayUncle points to an amusing mishap over at Field and Stream, in what’s an otherwise decent article on rifles in the past decade:
The Supreme Court’s Keller decision. Article II lives!
Yes, he’s going to find out just how alive Article II is if the Obama Administration starts implementing Mayor Bloomberg’s Blueprint to Prevent Gun Ownership.
Hamblen Says He’ll Appeal
According to this article in the Christian Science Monitor:
Hamblen says he’s not surprised that he lost at the appeals court. But he says he is surprised that he’s received no help from gun-rights advocates. “They are treating me like I’m a skunk at the picnic,†he said.
As for his case, he plans to fight on. He says his lawyer is preparing a final appeal, a petition to the US Supreme Court. “Why stop now? I’ve already done the hard part. I’ve already done my time,†Hamblen says. “All they can do is say no.â€
My prediction is that the Court will refuse to take the case, leaving the Sixth Circuit decision on his conviction in place. Hamblen will remain a convicted felon. He shouldn’t be surprised being treated like a skunk in a picnic, because that’s generally what I would call someone who puts everyone else’s legal rights at risk because he’s right dammit.
I’m not outraged because I believe it’s correct to exclude fully automatic firearms from the Second Amendment, but because I think it’s wrong. If someday public and judicial opinion on the topic changes, we’ll need circuit courts where that issue is undecided in order to move a case forward. Wayne Fincher has already sealed up the Eighth Circuit with a bad ruling, and now the Sixth Circuit is closed off as well thanks to Mr. Hamblen. Others may venerate these men as heros, but I don’t believe they are. We all know what the law is, and if you’re going to force your case in front of federal judges, you owe it to everyone else who’s passionate about the issue to prepare a careful, thorough, and well put together case. Dick Heller is a hero. Otis McDonald is a hero. These men did it correctly. Skunks at a picnic? I can’t think of any analogy more apt.
More on the Brady Center Begging for Cash
Joe notes the begging has continued, and has some interesting videos, which I really hope are supposed to be parodies.
He Did the Right Thing
It might surprise Robb, but I don’t think this incident that SayUncle linked to is an example of why open carry is a bad idea. The gist is that a store security guard attempted to remove a man’s openly carried gun from its holster. While I think the possibility of being disarmed is real, based on the account, this guy appears to have responded quickly and correctly to the attempt. The security guard is guilty of assault, and the open carrier used reasonable force to defeat the assault against him. He did everything right. This isn’t an example of open carry being a bad idea, but it is an example of the importance of retention training if you’re going to open carry.