DC Shenanigans

As was to be expected, the District of Columbia has passed a new set of gun laws which basically ignore the vast majority of the Heller decision, while throwing a minor bone to the courts.  Chris Cox, NRA-ILA’s Chief Lobbyist calls it “a joke.” The trigger lock provisions, which the Supreme Court explicitly threw out, are the most offensive.

But there is a bill in Congress to resolve this issue.  Eleanor Norton doesn’t think too highly of it:

However, Norton, who does not comment on District bills out of respect for Home Rule to set an example for other members of Congress, sharply criticized a pending congressional D.C. gun bill, H.R. 1399, Congressman Mark E. Souder (R-RI) introduced last week.

Souder’s bill is, “proof that some members either don’t have enough to do or know no bounds to their capacity for disrespect for democracy in the nation’s capital,” Norton said. She continued, “Republicans tried to overturn the city’s gun bans on four different occasions and failed, even when they were in the majority.  It’s not surprising that Congressman Souder, who was a frequent sponsor of anti-Home Rule bills, would continue to try to overturn the city’s gun laws.

Well, for one, Mark Souder represents Indiana, not Rhode Island.  Norton and her staff are so incompetent, they don’t even know the states her colleagues are from apparently.  Secondly, Congress has plenary authority over the District of Colombia.  It’s in the constitution, you can look it up.  There is no appeal to Home Rule for DC.  The DC City Council serves at the pleasure of Congress.  End of story.

For those who have time, here’s the resolution introduced in Congress which would set and then preempt the firearms laws for D.C.  It essentially imposes federal gun laws, and not much more.  No registraton, no bans of semi-automatic firearms, no lawsuit provisions, and no trigger lock provisions, and no ammunition restrictions, other than those imposed by existing federal laws.  The only differences is that firearms covered by the NFA will still be prohibited in The Distrct, and it does not address the issue of carrying firearms outside the home.  This is a good start, however, and we can fix the carry issue later.  If D.C. City Council shows itself to be petulant on this important constitutional matter, I think it’s entirely appropriate for Congress to exercise its authority over The District, and preempt them from regulating firearms.  Be sure to contact your Congress Critter, and tell them to vote for this important piece of legislation.

That’s a Lot of Names

The Terrorists Watch List has hit 1,000,000 names.  Who’s on it?  How do you end up getting on there?  How do you get yourself off there if there’s a mistake?  We don’t know! Well we know at least one person on the list, and Ted Kennedy.

That’s the beauty of it for the gun control groups, and power hungry authoritarians like Senator Frank Lautenburg.  By making it illegal to sell a gun to anyone who is on this mystery list, we can take away the constitutional rights we don’t approve of, with no due process.  I thought only Bush was the one mugging our civil rights over the war on terror?

More Pool Abuse

Thanks to Bitter, we have another fine example of Law Abiding Pool Owners flagrantly violating the law.  Do you notice any fences?  Alarms around the pool?  Let’s not even mention the multiple building and amusement code violations.  Are these the kinds of pool owners the National Pool Association tells us are “law abiding?”

It’s well established that having a pool in the house greatly increases the likelihood of you or your loved ones drowning in one of the thousands of pool accidents that happen every year.  This is what happens when parents leave a pool within easy reach of children.  Leave your pool unattended, an unsecured, and irresponsible hands may find it, and operate an amusement ride without a license or permit.  Parents are well advised to never keep a pool around the house, especially without also securing plywood, tarps, and ladders.

Another E-Postal Revision

It looks like Firehand’s results got lost in transmission, so I had to do another revision of the June E-Postal results.  I promise I’ll have my shit together for the Gun Blog Rifle League.  For that, and for any future e-postal matches I might host, I think I might set up a separate e-mail to keep it separate from my normal blog traffic.  Makes it less likely I’ll miss someone’s score.

Pools Kill

Looks like the folks in New York State are in for some trouble, because local town officials in Massena, NY are demanding people erect fences and put alarms on inflatable pools.  I think this is a fine idea.  Pools kill far more kids each year than guns, and if I have to lock up my guns, they should have to lock up their pools!  Don’t these parents know that having a pool more than doubles the risk of your family experiencing a drowning accident?  If we’re going to be ridiculous, we might as well go whole hog.

Operation Blunt 2

Joe Huffman and SayUncle talk about what wonderful success the authorities in the UK have been having trying to purge sharp, pointy things from human knowledge.  I mean, if you want to talk about how stupid gun control is, this goes beyond ridiculousness.  I can make an edged weapon capable of killing someone out of crap laying around my office inside of ten minutes.  How do you regulate that?

Michael Bane on Competition

I think Michael’s correct here that competition a useful training tool.  Though, it looks like he’s speaking mostly of IPSC and IDPA, which I’ve had no experience with.  Silhouette shooting is not really an adrenaline pumping game.  Mostly taking slow, deliberately and carefully aimed shots.  Nonetheless, I’ve had more than a few cases where I can knock animals down like there’s no tomorrow in practice, only to perform poorly once I get on the line.  Knowing “this one is for the marbles” tweaks you up a bit, and you can’t hold as steady.

I do wish I could do IPSC competition, but the rules at my club make it impossible, and I don’t know any of the other clubs in the area that do it.  I don’t really have time to drive out to rural Pennsylvania on a regular basis to compete.  There is a local indoor range that does non-sanctioned IDPA matches, and it happens to be my favorite indoor range.  Maybe I’ll have to give that a whirl at some point.

I think there’s a lot of clubs that are stuck in old ways.  Practical shooting looks like it’s fun, exciting, and there’s a lot of folks who seem to really enjoy doing it.  When I have watched the IDPA matches at the indoor range, I see a lot of young people getting into it.  That tends to make me think this is a growing sport, whereas the traditional types of sports done at my club are mostly older guys.  At 34, I’m pretty young compared to a lot of them.  But I think to traditionalists, IDPA and IPSC shooting seem unsafe, and most of the clubs I’ve looked into have rules that prevent that kind of match from ever taking place.  I tend to think clubs will need to adapt in this regard or face dwindling participation in organized events.  I know one disappointment of my club is that, although we have 1100 members, hardly anyone participates in organized matches, except for trap events.  Most people are just thinking of it as a place to plink every now and then.  I suppose that’s fine, but I think different types of shooting sports might get more people involved, and help build a sense of community that I think is important in a shooting club.  That requires gun owners to think different, and adopt new ideas, which I think we’re extraordinarily bad at.  I think it’s more than just the industry that’s resistant to change.  It’s a strong cultural inclination within the entire shooting community.