Number one Brady ranked California’s gun laws are just too lax, according to their CA state chapter. They’ll always be too lax. If you can obtain a firearm, they are too lax. Don’t believe it when they say otherwise.
Month: June 2008
Philly: Last Union Town
Philly has long been held hostage by trade unions. If Nutter manages to break them, he’ll be doing the City a tremedous service on the way to turning it around. Just to give you an idea how this city works:
A few days earlier, a couple of blocks away, the same electricians union had been outbid for a job repairing a bit of wiring at the Five Guys burger joint. The electricians are headed by John Dougherty, one of the city’s most vocal and visible union leaders, who has a reputation for rough tactics when it comes to union business. The union — Local 98 — sent picketers who insinuated that the restaurant was unclean due to a vermin infestation.
The unions in Philadelphia are no better than a criminal shakedown racket, and they are in desperate need of having their power smashed. If Nutter can accomplish that, it’ll make up for some of his bungling stupidity in other areas. This, no doubt, also has to do with Philadelphia voters kicking John Dougherty to the curb.
Having grown up in an area with a lot of union households, I can say based on my antecdotal evidence, this is more than just political correctness:
The “problematic†piece of legislation stemmed from a push by City Council for more racial balance in the trade unions, following a series of stunning revelations in previous weeks.
I had one of my friends who was in a trade union explain to me that “there’s no way we’d accept more n*****s into the apprenticeship when it’s getting harder for white people to find work.” Another said “if you hire scab labor, it’s just a bunch of lazy mexicans who will do faulty work.” When I used to work in a union shop part time in high school, it was our company’s unstated policy that no blacks would be hired, and I was looked at as if I had some kind of disease when I suggested this practice might be, I don’t know, morally and lawfully wrong. The common belief was “They’ll steal our product, and sell it to all to their ‘home boys.'”
Now, I’m not saying that all union members are racist, but in my experience growing up and working for a bit in that kind of environment, the attitude is pretty prevalent, and it’s difficult for me to believe that doesn’t make its way into decisions about who and who doesn’t get let into the apprenticeships.
It’s been almost two decades since I worked in a union shop, so maybe things have changed since then, but I think they’ve largely kept African Americans and other minorities out of the skilled trades, and the skilled trades are a way out of the poverty trap. As libertarians, we can’t go around demanding and end to government handouts and affermative action, and let remain in place the system, such as the one that exists in Philadelphia, that allow unions to hold the city hostage, and deny a fair shot to people outside that system to get ahead. It’s high time that was ended, and it’ll be an important component of any turnaround the city might have.
UPDATE: This is what used to happen when you stand up to union thugs in Philadelphia:
Altemose installed a mile-long chain-link fence around his work site, and proceeded without the unions. He started carrying a pistol, which he practiced shooting while wearing his coat and tie.
He and his workers received threats — such as acid in their kids’ faces — if the work continued. Altemose installed a device on his car so he could start it by remote control each morning in his driveway.
In June, a thousand union men showed up in Valley Forge, wearing hard hats. They trampled over the chain-link fence and began what the state Supreme Court later called “a virtual military assault,†using color-coded smoke bombs to designate targeted areas, along with firebombs and — incredibly — hand grenades.
The second amendment protects us against a lot more than just government thugs. Would Altmouse have had the minerals to stand up to the unions if he was forcibly disarmed by a government that would have most decidedly looked the other way when it came to union thugs carrying guns?
On Emergency Powers
There has been a bit of controversey over my statement on the picture of a police officer in Iowa holding a man at gunpoint who attempted to push his way through a police blockade with his vehicle. I should note that I was merely pointing out that the officer in question was within the bounds of the law in his action. Under Iowa’s emergency powers statutes, the Governor can order the police to enforce evacuation zones. That might not be right, but that’s the law. If you ever want the civil libertarian in you to go into convulsions, take a look at your state’s emergency powers provisions. Pennsylvania’s is here.
State of emergency declarations have the effect of expanding the powers of the governor greatly. Under Pennsylvania law, for instance, they state personnel are empowered to come on to your property and remove any debris that could be considered a threat to public health or safety, including, one would presume, the remains of your house. Another provision can be found here:
§ 7308. Laws suspended during emergency assignments.
In the case of a declaration of a state of emergency by the Governor, Commonwealth agencies may implement their emergency assignments without regard to procedures required by other laws (except mandatory constitutional requirements) pertaining to the performance of public work, entering into contracts, incurring of obligations, employment of temporary workers, rental of equipment, purchase of supplies and materials and expenditures of public funds.
Pennsylvania’s emergency powers are rather limited compared to what I’ve seen in a lot of states. There doesn’t seem to be any power to enforce evacuation zones, for instance, like there is in Iowa law. [UPDATE, there is, see in comments below] But the time to look at your state emergency powers provisions, and petition your government to make changes to it, is now. Most of these laws have been in place for decades, and it’s easier to get them changed when there’s not a disaster than get them changed when there is.
I stand by my assertion that challenging that authority with the officers charged with enforcing the Governor’s edicts (and yes, under most emergency powers laws, the governor gets to make edicts) isn’t the way to go. If you feel being kept from your property is a violation of your rights, there is a remedy for that through the courts. My feeling is that restricting movement ought to be unconstitutional except in the most dire circumstances (like a pandemic). But my opinion isn’t law, and making ones opinion law is usually an uphill battle if you can’t get a lot of your fellow citizens to agree with you.
ATF Enforcement in Philadelphia
Looking over this very interesting post on ATF enforcement patterns at SayUncle, it would seem the City of Philadelphia refers a great number of cases over to federal prosecutors for violations of federal gun laws. The feds took only 238 of the 1578 cases that were referred to them. The top reason for our district was “Minimal federal interest, or no deterrent value.”
So if the feds aren’t using the laws to go after actual violent criminals, but are using the law to go after people like Wayne Fincher, David Olafson, and various other folks who are no threat to polite society, what use are they really in terms of public safety? What is the “federal interest” in sending hobbyists to federal prison, but not violent felons?
Uncommon Common Sense on Guns
Playmobil Police State
I have to agree with Kevin on this one. Playmobil is a German company, so I’ll take some comfort in that, but it’s kind of disturbing this is sold anywhere. Or was, rather. I can’t find it as a current product offering on their web site.
Disarming Britain
I don’t know why you need ads like this in a country where handguns are strictly banned:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj-4JDlDs0E[/youtube]
You’d almost think the laws were ineffective, and only resulted in criminals having guns. Nah! Can’t be. That’s crazy talk!
Hat tip to reader Guav
UPDATE: Here’s the blog associated with the video.
AP Licensing Terms
AP is apparently expecting us to pay by the words for words exerpted from their articles. It sucks to be part of a dying medium, I’m sure, but fair use is fair use. Here’s another fun tidbit:
It gets better! If you pay to quote the AP, but you offend the AP in so doing, the AP “reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time if Publisher or its agents finds Your use of the licensed Content to be offensive and/or damaging to Publisher’s reputation.”
The mainstream media is declaring war on blogs. We have to be ready and willing to circle the wagons to protect our medium. Do we have laywers who would be willing to work cheap in the event a blog gets sued? I think it’s time to start lining that up. A lot is at stake.
That Word Just Keeps Popping Up
Iowa Picture
GunPundit points to a picture I’ve seen making the rounds through forums and what not. It shows an Iowa police officer holding a gun on a driver. I’ve variously seen this attributed to police enforcing a checkpoint with excessive force. Didn’t blog about it when I first saw it, because we had no context.  Well, here’s the context:
After being denied re-entry to a flooded neighborhood, Rick Blazek, 53, returned to his vehicle as a state trooper used his police vehicle to block the checkpoint, according to the news release.
“Blazek drove his vehicle toward the state trooper and struck the state trooper three times with his vehicle,” the release said.
Police told Blazek to get out of his vehicle, and when he refused, “the driver’s window was broken out because the doors were locked and Blazek was removed from his vehicle,” according to the release.
The trooper was not injured. Blazek, who was arrested and charged with assault on a peace officer with a deadly weapon, could not be immediately reached for comment.
The trooper in question was fully justified in drawing his pistol on the driver as they took him into custody. Cars are deadly weapons. Whether or not the police were justified in keeping a man from his home isn’t material. You’re allowed to use force to overcome an unlawful restraint (different from kidnapping), but not deadly force.
Whether or not one can be kept from one’s home is a matter of emergency powers provisions under the Iowa Code, which seem to allow for “Control ingress and egress to and from a disaster area, the movement of persons within the area, and the occupancy of premises in such area.” and “A peace officer, when in full and distinctive uniform or displaying a badge or other insignia of authority, may arrest without a warrant any person violating or attempting to violate in such officer’s presence any order or rule, made pursuant to this chapter. This authority shall be limited to those rules which affect the public generally.”
So under the Iowa Code, the governor can prevent persons from entering a declare disaster area, and the police are empowered to enforce edicts issued under the Governor’s disaster powers.