I shanâ€™t re-rehearse my case against the civil use of terror watch lists here;Â those interested can read my three offerings from last year here and here and here. But I will suggest a modest course for those in Congress who remain opposed to this folly: Why not amend any bill so that it covers the entire Bill of Rights? Hillary Clinton is on record suggesting that the United States should impose some censorship on the Internet so that would-be terrorists cannot communicate with one other. Well, if the prospect of terrorists using the internet really is that dangerous â€” and if those who oppose Clintonâ€™s coveted reforms are just dogmaticallyÂ wedded to outdated concepts such as â€œfreedom of speech, et cetera . . .â€ â€“ then there shouldnâ€™t be any problem with the federal government preventingÂ anybody suspected of terrorism from using a modem, should there?Â Sure, at one point in American history it made sense to require due process before we stripped core rights. But that was back in the days of pamphlets and printing presses, not now when one can spread information across the world in the blink of an eye.
Read the whole thing. He also has clearly read his Alinsky: make them live up to their own standards. The arguments the Dems will make against this will destroy their own arguments for the gun portion of it.