search
top

Civil Rights Victory in Delaware

In response to a question from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, The Delaware Supreme Court has ruled in Doe v. Wilmington Housing Authority that Section 20 of the Delaware Constitution, passed in 1987, is more extensive than 3rd Circuit precedent recognizes for the 2nd Amendment, which does not extend outside the home. Delaware’s Section 20 explicitly recognizes a right to carry outside the home for self-defense.

At issue is Wilmington Housing Authority’s revised regulations on guns, which prohibits carrying firearms in common areas. The Delaware Supreme Court argues they violate Section 20 of the Delaware Constitution. The Court uses intermediate scrutiny here, but they do a much more honest analysis at that level than most courts, which have really just instituted rational basis review under the guise of intermediate scrutiny. Here’s the Court:

To satisfy its burden, WHA argues that it has an important governmental interest in protecting the health, welfare, and safety of all WHA residents, staff, and guests who enter onto WHA property. WHA argues that an accidental discharge of a firearm may have serious fatal consequences and that dangers inhere in the increased presence of firearms. But these same concerns would also apply to the area within any apartment—interior locations where the WHA concedes it cannot restrict the possession of firearms for self-defense. The Revised Policy does more than proscribe the unsafe use of a firearm. It also prohibits possession in the public housing common areas except where the firearm is being transported to or from an apartment. In this context, WHA must show more than a general safety concern and it has not done so.

In Griffin v. State we explained that an individual’s interest in the right to keep and bear arms is strongest when “the weapon is in one’s home or business and is being used for security.”61 Residents have a possessory interest in both their apartments and the common areas. And although Residents cannot exclude other residents or the public from the common areas, their need for security in those areas is just as high for purposes of Section 20 as it would be inside their apartment or business. The common areas are effectively part of the residences. The laundry rooms and TV rooms are similar to those typically found in private residences; and the Residents, their families, and their guests will occupy them as part of their living space.

The Court court had before it two questions: was the ban on firearms in common areas of public housing constitutional under the Delaware Constitution. They answered that no, it was unconstitutional. The second question is whether they could require copies of permits and licensing other documentation in support of enforcing their regulation, and the Delaware Supreme Court answered that that provision was overbroad, and was likewise unconstitutional under Section 20:

The Reasonable Cause Provision was enacted, together with the Common Area Provision, by the WHA in response to McDonald. Because the unconstitutional Common Area Provision is not severable as a matter of Delaware law, the Reasonable Cause Provision which enforces it is unconstitutional and overbroad as well. For that reason, we answer the second certified question in the negative.

If only ever court did intermediate scrutiny analysis like the Delaware Supreme Court just did it, we might be in much better shape. Congratulations Delaware, you have a Supreme Court that takes your rights seriously.

3 Responses to “Civil Rights Victory in Delaware”

  1. Matthew Carberry says:

    They reference Peruta, and use similar reasoning.

    This ruling reiterates that Delaware’s Constitution goes beyond the 3rd Circuit’s interpretation of the Federal 2A in Heller and clearly secures a long-established right in DE to carry outside the home for defense, and thus that permitted concealed carry is only a privilege (may issue) as long as open carry remains lawful.

    The deeper into the legal weeds we get even in the “may-issue” states the more aberrant NJ, NYC, and DC style “no issue” becomes.

  2. Longscout says:

    Good news for truth. Now…Stand back and await the many lies that will be hoisted like national flags and explained as “reasonable” by those who cringe to imagine that a person might be empowered to defend and even save his own life or that of others.

  3. I visited many sites however the audio feature for audio songs current at this site is actually excellent.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. SayUncle » Civil Rights Victory - […] Delaware, you can carry a gun outside the home. Even if you live in government […]
  2. Civil Rights Victory in Delaware | - […] Read more at Shall Not Be Questioned […]
  3. CalGunLaws | On Target Legal Resources Online » (DE) Civil Rights Victory - […] - from “Shall Not Be Questioned” […]
top