Kim Stolfer just sent out an e-mail alert to inform Pennsylvania gun owners of the importance of the race between Monica Douglass and David Levdansky:
Levdansky tells constituents that he “believes that our Constitution grants me the right to bear arms†and yet his voting record and statements throughout his career show a disdain for individual liberty. For example, at a Game and Fish Committee hearing in 1986 in Clarion, PA, Levdansky said:
“insofar as the constitutional question of the right to keep and bear arms is concerned, I think that that argument is rather hollow and shallow . . . At best, I think that the right to bear arms argument is nothing more than rightwing, ideological rhetoric and ought to be dismissed as suchâ€.
He has never repudiated his statement and this, along with other statements and his voting record, reveal his true agenda. Representative David Levdansky has become the poster child for Cease Fire Pennsylvania, the most outspoken anti-gun group in Pennsylvania—and the spokesman for the anti-gun Philadelphia Legislative Caucus. His position on these issues cannot and should not be trusted. Gunowners and hunters have been deceived long enough!
Levdansky has been an anti-gun leader in the Pennsylvania House, and everyone in Pennsylvania has a vested interest in ousting him. Monica Douglass needs money and volunteers to get her message out so we can secure our gun rights in Pennsylvania.
The reason we work hard to defeat guys like Levdansky is because if the anti-gun legislators see their leadership getting their electoral heads lopped off, the next one in line might feel a little unsure about sticking their necks out on behalf of CeaseFire PA. This is how we become formidable.
Pardon my language, but HOLY SHIT!
“insofar as the constitutional question of the right to keep and bear arms is concerned, I think that that argument is rather hollow and shallow . . . At best, I think that the right to bear arms argument is nothing more than rightwing, ideological rhetoric and ought to be dismissed as suchâ€.
At BEST it’s ideological rhetoric?!!
Notice that he said, “grant’s ME the right”. A slip of the tongue, a Freudian slip, or deliberate, sneaky elitism?
I’ve known Monica through JHS and HS. She is one of the most honest, resolute, and compassionate people that I have ever met.
Her diligence in the preservation of the facts that we hold true as GOD given rights makes me proud to endorse her as my candidate for “Best Up’n Comer”