Ruling on Tennessee Restaurant Carry

This ruling is certainly a setback, but it doesn’t yet change the law for most of the state, as far as I can tell. SayUncle is checking with his peeps too [UPDATE: Looks like it only applies to Davidson County]. Hopefully like National Park Carry, this will be a short lived victory for the other side, one way or another.

4 Responses to “Ruling on Tennessee Restaurant Carry”

  1. mikeb302000 says:

    I agree with the judge in saying the law is too ambiguous. The idea of allowing guns in establishments which serve at least one meal, five days a week reminds me of the AWB.

    I guess both sides have difficulty at times legislating what they want.

  2. Sebastian says:

    The problem is, TN law makes no distinction between a bar and a restaurant. Since CCL holders aren’t allowed to drink while carrying, I don’t see any reason to try to make the distinction.

  3. Matthew Carberry says:

    I have yet to figure out from AK statutes the exact way to tell a “bar” from a “restaurant”. If it isn’t obvious by how much food they serve and what they call themselves I have started checking their liquor license type.

    If I weren’t lazy it would probably be worth it to put together a list and run it by the AG.

  4. Weer'd Beard says:

    MikeB is nothing but a Troll!

    Sebastian maybe you’ll join me in the boycott of his blog?

    Don’t feed the troll!


  1. When So-Called Trolls are Useful | Snowflakes in Hell - [...] been asked by a reader to boycott a regular commenter, the infamous anti-gun Mikeb302000. Joining something like this [...]