PLCAA Fails to Gain Another Dismissal

Far from the claims that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act would offer blanket immunity to the gun industry from suit, it once again is shown not to be the case.

Once appeared here a quote from the SLC Tribune, but I removed it because they work with the scum of the earth Righthaven. The dealer being sued was fined because the sale of the shotgun was illegal, so the suit was allowed to proceed.

It’s not the kind of suit that PLCAA was meant to stop, so it can go forward.  It was only meant to prevent cities from suing gun manufacturers on completely bogus premises, like they are responsible for all the crime in the city, and are creating a public nuisance.