Here’s some limitations prsented from the opinion:
Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited.Â It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Courtâ€™s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Millerâ€™s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those â€œin common use at the timeâ€ finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.
Interesting.Â Perhaps The Court will be willing to entertain open carry being constitutionally protected, while concealed carry remains something that may be licensed by the state.Â But can it be outright prohibited?Â Â Doesn’t seem to get into that.