search
top

Another Schuylkyll River Trail Shooting?

Via MikeB, I hadn’t heard about this one. Apparently a guy took a shot at a dog who was charging him. Interestingly enough that he was following good advice:

Bennett said after he crossed the bridge over Markley Street on the way to the Norristown Transportation Center, he spotted a dog running free that was growling in a threatening manner and headed in his direction. Fearing he would be attacked, he fired at the animal with a Glock brand handgun.

Shooting at a dog or other animals threatening to attack a domestic pet or person is legal in Pennsylvania; however, as a precaution, Brooke took the man’s gun and pepper spray he was carrying.

The guy had his gun and spray returned to him. Pepper spray can be useful in these kinds of situations, but charging, angry dog probably isn’t one of them, if your goal is not to get bitten. Given where he was on the trail, I would be concerned the dog was either feral or dangerous myself. I think he made the right call, and obviously the police didn’t have a problem with it. If he had been bitten, you’d want a corpse they can test for rabies. Absent a corpse you go through a series of costly injections as a prophylactic measure. The only problem is that it’s very hard to hit a charging dog, as this guy found out, and unlike humans, an angry dog doesn’t know he’s supposed to stop when he gets shot. I’ve heard of stories of dogs taking multiple hits and still attacking.

It’s not surprising that people carry on the trail. I carried on the trail myself when I used to bike there. The Norristown through Conshohocken leg isn’t the best of neighborhoods, and attacks have happened. I notice also that they didn’t cite this guy for violating the county rule against weapons on the trail. Maybe they got the message that’s not enforceable.

4 Responses to “Another Schuylkyll River Trail Shooting?”

  1. Chas Clifton says:

    I am glad that it turned out well, that his pistol was not confiscated, and so on.

    But the best weapon for nasty dogs is still a *big* pepper spray cannister, the kind designed for bears, not for muggers.

    Having worked for the Bureau of Land Management in bear country a few summers, I favor UDAP Pepper Power Bear Deterrent in the 8 oz. cannister. It goes on your belt.

    It’s easier to hit an animal’s eyes, nose and mouth with spray than make a solid shot with a handgun when it is moving and you are pumping adrenalin.

    And the legal consequences are potentially less.

  2. Sebastian says:

    Not a bad idea for backwoods use, I agree. A but of a cumbersome item to carry in an urban setting.

  3. Chas Clifton says:

    I’d say that the bear spray is as or more concealable than a medium to large-framed handgun. Not as concealable as a snubbie, for instance. YMMV.

  4. Weer'd Beard says:

    Maybe this is the question the taurus judge has been waiting for!

    “What gun for charging dog on a biking/Jogging train?”

top