search
top

Against Gun Ownership Indeed

If the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Ownership isn’t against people owning guns, why are they gloating over the fact that one of McCain’s advisors got prosecuted for having an unloaded shotgun in his car in DC?  I would think in a world where people hunt, and shoot clays, a common pastime in DC politics, that it should be common and accepted, even by the Brady Campaign.

Unless, of course, you believe all guns should be illegal, and all hunters and shooters who transport their firearms in compliance with federal law (but maybe not DC’s now unconstitutional law), should be in jail.  Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Ownership, Indeed.

4 Responses to “Against Gun Ownership Indeed”

  1. Ted says:

    Oh, come on. All they want is “common sense” gun laws.

    Like nobody can have one. See? No biggie!

  2. Brad says:

    Despite all the recent efforts to camoflage their true goals, the anti-gun crusaders just can’t help themselves from revealing their true face as the example you point to demonstrates.

    That’s why the Heller decision is such a clarifying moment in politics. All over America, the fanatics of the anti-gun movement couldn’t resist showing to everyone just what extremists they truly are. I’m just shocked that the Democratic Party hasn’t reacted to the changed circumstances and are still using the same talking points (ala Kessler) and proposing the same policies (AW ban) that they did back in the 2004 election. I guess they really are willing to sacrifice another Presidential candidate to the dark gods of gun-control.

  3. ATL says:

    “Despite all the recent efforts to camoflage their true goals, the anti-gun crusaders just can’t help themselves from revealing their true face as the example you point to demonstrates.

    That’s why the Heller decision is such a clarifying moment in politics. All over America, the fanatics of the anti-gun movement couldn’t resist showing to everyone just what extremists they truly are.”

    True,

    It’s been this way since the 2000 election. Liberals have a harder time nowadays hiding their true intentions. This is why even after the 2000 election they had trouble making significant political gains. The Brady Camp is in actuality an organization that looks to destroy gun rights period. Their goal is to take away all guns from the general public because they believe the general public cannot use them responsibly. Liberals have an innate hostility to the non-intellectual public. Going back to the time of Lenin this has been so; if those among the populace are not as they are , they generally view them with disdain.

    In reality, the biggest sin among these groups is hubris. They are absolutely intoxicated with their own ideology and cannot see beyond their own ideas. This gives them a false sense of security and an almost comical tendency to overplay their hand (i.e. The Wellstone Memorial). Expect this to increase as they display their “inevitable” clime to the presidency. Get the popcorn ready!

  4. twohandcontrol says:

    All of us with any sense know the Brady Campaign takes every little morsel and lies they can to use in their favor for their Campaign on Guns. If it was not to take guns away from the law abiding Citizens, shouldn’t their name be The Brady Campaign to Prevent Violence Crimes. What difference does it make how the Crime is committed?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. The Antis Sometimes Tip Their Hand - [...] Speaking of the real intentions of the anti-civil rights groups, Sebastian makes an interesting point on the Brady Campaign…
top