He says that law evolves, but he also says:
“What we’re seeing on the streets of Philadelphia is not self-defense. It is sensless violence and slaughter.”
Nutter says it’s not lawful ownership but illegal activity that is the source of the gun violence in the city.
Really? Because my friend might have a different view on this one. Sorry Mayor, just because your lapdogs in the media aren’t reporting cases of self-defense against the criminals whom you have allowed to run amok, doesn’t mean they aren’t happening.
I love Alaska because most people understand the premise of “an armed society is a polite society”. Write in Ron Paul.
“Nutter says it’s not lawful ownership but illegal activity that is the source of the gun violence in the city.”
IF it’s illegal activity (criminals), not lawful ownership (guns), then why does Nutter keep trying to ban and capriciously regulate lawful ownership? Did he understand what he said?