search
top

New York Times Weighs in on Lead Ammo Ban

Of course they think it’s a disgrace that the EPA can’t ban lead ammunition, because why can’t we have a back door way to end the shooting sports and hunting as we know it? That would mean Heller and McDonald are without consequence, and we won’t be dismantling New York City’s gun laws in short order. It think that’s what the Times is really afraid of.

One Response to “New York Times Weighs in on Lead Ammo Ban”

  1. FatWhiteMan says:

    You sure are giving the NYT the benefit of the doubt on the ability for them to think or plan something.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. New York Times Weighs in on Lead Ammo Ban | Snowflakes in Hell - [...] Of course they think it’s a disgrace that the EPA can’t ban lead ammunition, because why can’t we have…
top