search
top

More on the Illinois CCW Debate

Thirdpower has more Todd Vandermyde, at a Chicago “Town Hall” meeting on concealed carry. Todd has been quite willing to engage in this issue at a very grassroots level, and I wish more NRA liaisons would take that cue. It is going to be increasingly necessary, going forward, for the strategy in every state to involve a combination of grassroots outreach and lobbying. Lobbying alone is simply no longer a recipe for overall success, and additionally, tends to drive mistrust and skepticism among the grassroots with the most energy to offer the cause.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon Post to Technorati

2 Responses to “More on the Illinois CCW Debate”

  1. Andy B. says:

    “Lobbying alone is simply no longer a recipe for overall success, and additionally, tends to drive mistrust and skepticism among the grassroots. . .”

    Wow. That probably deserves a long essay, but off the top of my head there are a couple top-level reasons for that. One is that lobbying necessarily involves the lobbyist as styling him/herself as speaking for everyone, which is not true; and usually having to act if they know better than everyone else what “we” should want. Another is, that I have never seen a citizen-lobbyist who was half as cagey as they thought they were, or, who wasn’t susceptible to being gulled by appeals to their own vanity and self-importance. “Access” politics is a very intoxicating brew.

  2. Patrick says:

    NRA’s liaison in Maryland (also covers DE and OK) is much the same. Shannon Alford works closely with grassroots and is a solid team player who represents NRA diligently, but also understands that under the corporate banner are real people.

    May they – and those like them – improve NRA and ILA.

top