search
top

Don’t Expect Transparency on Gun Policy from the White House

I love going back to look at some of President Obama’s promises about transparency in government. We gun owners and Second Amendment supporters shouldn’t be shocked that the administration’s dedication to keep public policy secrets is likely to be used against us. I mean the guy violated a key transparency promise to share all non-emergency bills with the public for five days before acting on them only nine days into his term. Nine days for the first transparency lie, is it any wonder that we still can’t get his administration to turn over documents about Fast & Furious? They’ve had three years now to perfect the ways they will violate the transparency pledges.

Remember last year when the White House promised to work on gun control secretly so that voters won’t know what he’s doing?

[Sarah] Brady, for whom the law requiring background checks on handgun purchasers is named, then met with White House press secretary Jay Carney. During the meeting, President Obama dropped in and, according to Sarah Brady, brought up the issue of gun control, “to fill us in that it was very much on his agenda,” she said.

“I just want you to know that we are working on it,” Brady recalled the president telling them. “We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

Obama’s buddy Mike Bloomberg already made sure that the White House has a blueprint for how he can enact more gun control without the oversight of Congress. Certainly, it sounds like the White House could be dusting off those plans from Bloomberg.

A day after President Obama vowed in a speech to “leave no stone unturned” in his quest to reduce gun violence, his spokesman said the president’s efforts won’t include any new gun-control proposals.

“There are things that we can do, short of legislation and short of gun laws, as the president said, that can reduce violence in our society,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said.

And another report:

President Obama suggested Thursday that he isn’t backing away from talking about gun policy.

“I’m sure we’ll have more opportunity to talk about this,” he said to a reporter’s question after he made brief remarks pressuring the House of Representatives to pass the middle class tax cut extension that cleared the Senate on Wednesday. …

Earlier Thursday, White House press secretary Jay Carney said the president was focused on gun control measures “short of legislation.”

Even the DC political press is outlining ways for Obama to enact more gun control while skirting the accountability to the people that typically comes with pushing it through Congress first. They note that we probably shouldn’t expect to hear much on what actions Obama might take:

Obama is no stranger to dipping deep into the murky waters of executive powers and finding ways to achieve policy goals that Congress has thwarted. Proponents of gun control say that the president has crystal clear and uncontested powers—some used by an NRA card-carrying GOP president (Bush resigned from the group in 1995)—to deal with assault weapons.

Yet the White House remains stonily silent on Obama’s intentions even to reevaluate whether to exercise these powers.

I would not be surprised if shortly after election day – regardless of the outcome – we start learning about all sorts of actions by various agencies to more tightly regulate guns in a way that circumvents the legislative process. You cannot expect transparency from this administration, so it’s probably best to prepare for the worst given the resources Bloomberg has provided and the promises the White House made to Brady in a closed meeting.

8 Responses to “Don’t Expect Transparency on Gun Policy from the White House”

  1. Patrick says:

    No matter what happens, they have made it an election issue. Time to see if our side has the mettle we claim to have.

  2. Sage Thrasher says:

    If Congress doesn’t start actually doing something soon, we’re going to get a lot more executive or “administration” decisions dictating policy, again regardless of who wins in November.

  3. Doctorscorry says:

    It makes me so angry that the public will stand for such blatant secrecy. Shouldn’t people want to know what is going on in our government? WHY CAN’T PEOPLE WAKE UP!

  4. harold Lloyd says:

    Seems pretty transparent to me…

    White House press secretary Jay Carney made it clear Thursday that while President Barack Obama still supports a ban on the sale of assault weapons, he’s not pushing for new gun laws at this time. “There are things we can do short of legislation and short of gun laws that can reduce violence in our society,” Mr. Carney said.

    “He believes that we can enhance the enforcement of existing laws by making it more difficult for those who should not have weapons under existing laws … to obtain weapons,”

    Mr. Obama supports the reinstatement of the assault weapons ban which expired in 2004, but said he wants to focus on strengthening background checks “given the stalemate in Congress.”

    During his speech on Wednesday, the president did say that it “shouldn’t be controversial” to make the case that a “mentally unbalanced” person should not be able to get a gun so easily.

    Read more: http://www.capitolcolumn.com/news/white-house-obama-not-pushing-for-new-gun-laws/#ixzz21wtSt0Nz

    • Bitter says:

      And how do you explain Carney also turning around and telling Sarah Brady that they promise to do things that are “under the radar”? Is he lying for the cameras or to his allies?

    • SDN says:

      Unfortunately for Obama and the rest of the Left, we’ve read history, and we’re well aware of how the Lefties, such as Stalin, have a history of defining “mentally unbalanced” as “any mind that doesn’t agree with me.”

      And then using that as an excuse for eliminating all opposition.

top